Schwartz, Gary K.

TPS10099 Background: PDGFRα is a receptor commonly overexpressed in STS. Olaratumab is a fully human IgG1 MAb which specifically binds to human PDGFRα and blocks PDGFR-mediated signaling pathways. Olaratumab demonstrated significant tumor inhibition as a monotherapy and in combination with standard chemotherapy in preclinical human sarcoma xenograft models. A Phase 1b/2 clinical trial for patients with advanced or metastatic STS is currently enrolling patients in 9 sites across the United States; approximately 45 patients have been randomized. Methods: In Phase 1b, patients received olaratumab (15 mg/kg) via intravenous infusion on Days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle and D (75 mg/m²) 1 hour after olaratumab on Day 1. Phase 1b was completed without encountering dose-limiting toxicities; enrollment into Phase 2 has begun. The primary endpoint of the Phase 2 portion is to compare progression-free survival in patients with advanced STS when treated with D plus olaratumab versus D alone. Planned enrollment goal for Phase 2 is 130 patients. Patients are required to be ≥ 18 years old with ECOG 0-2, have appropriate organ function and histologically confirmed, measurable, and advanced STS. There is no restriction on the number of prior therapies. Patients are randomized 1:1 to either D plus olaratumab (Arm A) at same dose/schedule as in Phase 1b or D alone (Arm B). All patients can receive dexrazoxane. Upon completion of 8 cycles, patients in Arm A continue with olaratumab monotherapy. Patients in Arm B who develop disease progression during or after treatment can subsequently receive olaratumab monotherapy. Patients are stratified to treatment arms according to PDGFRα expression (positive vs. negative), number of previous lines of treatment, sarcoma subtype, and ECOG performance status. Response assessment occurs every 6 weeks. Exploratory analyses include biomarkers of olaratumab pharmacodynamic activity including PDGF ligands, PDGFR downstream molecules, VEGF, and changes in vascularity of tumor specimens.

10003 Background: Preclinical studies demonstrate synergistic anti-tumor activity by inhibiting mTOR and IGF-1R. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of A12 and TEM in 3 chemo-refractory cohorts: IGF-1R (+) STS (Arm A), IGF-1R (+) bone (Arm B), and IGF-1R (-) bone and STS (Arm C). Methods: An optimal Simon 2 stage design was used for each arm. The primary end-point was progression free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks. Based on historical data, a 40% PFS rate was considered promising and a 20% PFS non-promising (type I/ II error, 0.05/0.10). ≥5 PFSs at 12 weeks were required in the first 19 and ≥16 PFSs were required in a total of 54 pts to consider each arm positive. Key eligibility: measurable disease (RECIST 1.1), age ≥18, 1- 4 priors, ECOG status 0-1. A12 (6 mg/kg) and TEM (25 mg) were administered IV weekly. Pre and post treatment tumor biopsies and plasma for IGF-1 and IGFBP3 were obtained. 20 Sarcoma Centers participated. Results: Starting in 02/2010, 383 pts were tested for IGF-1R by immunohistochemistry (IHC; 54% +) and 171 were treated: mean age 47 (range: 18-80), mean # priors 2.2 (range: 1-4). Grade 3/4 toxicities ≥10%: lymphopenia (12%), mucositis (10%). By intent to treat (ITT) analysis, each arm of the study achieved its primary 12 week PFS end-point (≥16 PFSs): Arm A: 18/56 (32%), Arm B: 19/50 (38%) (4 too early), Arm C: 27/63 (43%). The one-sided 95% CI for 12-week PFS is (0.22, 1), (0.27, 1), and (0.32, 1), respectively. By ITT the median PFS (95% CI) in weeks for each arm is 6.3 (5.9, 12.0), 11.0 (8.0, 18.0) and 11.6 (9.0, 17.9), respectively, and for chondro (n=18), Ewing’s (n=24), and osteo (n=23) only it is 22.6 (5.7, 40.9), 10.4 (5.7, 17.9) and 6.0 (6.0, 18.0), respectively. Westerns on 32 matched pair tumor biopsies indicate inhibition of IGF-1R, pAKT and pS6. Of biopsies on 7 IGF-1R (-) IHC pts (Arm C), 5 were IGF-1R (+) by western. Plasma biomarkers did not correlate with PFS. Conclusions: A12 and TEM met its primary end-point of improved PFS in pts with metastatic sarcoma. This effect was independent of IGF-1R status by IHC. These results support further clinical development of this combination in bone and STS.

TPS10594 Background: Approximately 13,000 cases of soft tissue and bone are diagnosed annually in the US. Despite primary surgery many patients develop recurrent disease. Response rates to chemotherapy are low and new agents are needed. Gene array studies have shown Aurora Kinase A (AURKA) commonly overexpressed. Inhibition of AURKA by shRNA or by a specific AURKA inhibitor blocks in vitro proliferation of multiple sarcoma subtypes. MLN8237 (alisertib) is a novel and oral, ATP-competitive, selective small-molecule inhibitor of AURKA. We hypothesize that alisertib will be an effective treatment for advanced/metastatic sarcoma. Methods: This CTEP-sponsored, investigator-initiated, multi-center phase II study uses alisertib in patients with advanced/metastatic sarcoma and is conducted through the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance A091102). Patients must have adequate performance status, organ function, and measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Patients are enrolled in one of five cohorts, depending on histology: 1) liposarcoma, 2) leiomyosarcoma, 3) undifferentiated sarcoma, 4) malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor, or 5) other. Patients are treated with alisertib 50mg PO BID d1-d7 every 21 days until either progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is objective overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Translational objectives include correlation of ORR, PFS and OS with baseline and post-treatment markers of AURKA inhibition in tumor biopsies and baseline and post-treatment [F-18] FLT-PET scans. A Simon two-stage design is used for each of the 5 cohorts and one confirmed response in the first 9 patients expands enrollment in that cohort to 24. Enrollment began in December 2012. As of January 2013, 14 pts have been enrolled. Funded by the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology. Clinical trial information: NCT01653028.

TPS10592 Background: Angiosarcomas (ASs) are rare, aggressive, malignant endothelial cell tumors that constitute 1% to 2% of all soft tissue sarcomas with 5-year survival of 35%. Cytotoxic agents have demonstrated response rates of about 15%. Gene-array data from MSKCC has revealed up-regulation of endothelial associated genes, including active members of the angiopoietin system e.g., Tie2 and Angiopoietin 2 (Ang2). Trebananib (AMG386) is a novel agent that targets Ang1 and Ang2. We hypothesize that inhibition of angiopoietin 2 with trebananib will be an effective therapy in patients (pts) with AS. Methods: This CTEP sponsored, investigator initiated, multi-center phase II study uses trebananib, in pts with AS having metastatic/unresectable AS and conducted through the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (Alliance A091103). Pts must have adequate performance status, organ function, and measurable disease (RECIST v1.1). Patients are treated with trebananib 30mg/kg d1, 8, 15, and 22 every 28 days until either progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint is objective overall response rate (ORR) via RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include the evaluation of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Translational objectives include correlation of ORR, PFS and OS with i. baseline and post-treatment expression of Ang2 and Tie2 by immunohistochemistry (IHC), ii. serum levels of Ang1 and Ang2, iii. baseline and post-treatment phospho-receptor tyrosine kinase (p-RTK) status of Tie2, VEGFR-2, PI3K, MEK and MAPK, and iv. mutational status of VEGFR-2 and amplification of MYC/FLT4. A Simon Optimal two-stage phase II study design is used and one confirmed response in the first 12 pts expands enrollment to 25. Pre- and post-treatment biopsies will be performed in up to 10 pts treated at MSKCC. Enrollment began in July 2012. As of January 2013, 7 pts have been recruited. Clinicaltrials.gov#: NCT01623869. Funded by the Alliance Clinical Trials in Oncology. NIH Grant CA-25224. Clinical trial information: NCT01623869.

Abstract Background The proportion of tumors of various histologies that may respond to drugs targeted to molecular alterations is unknown. NCI-MATCH, a collaboration between ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and the National Cancer Institute, was initiated to find efficacy signals by matching patients with refractory malignancies to treatment targeted to potential tumor molecular drivers regardless of cancer histology. Methods Trial development required assumptions about molecular target prevalence, accrual rates, treatment eligibility, and enrollment rates as well as consideration of logistical requirements. Central tumor profiling was performed with an investigational next-generation DNA–targeted sequencing assay of alterations in 143 genes, and protein expression of protein expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog, mutL homolog 1, mutS homolog 2, and RB transcriptional corepressor 1. Treatments were allocated with a validated computational platform (MATCHBOX). A preplanned interim analysis evaluated assumptions and feasibility in this novel trial. Results At interim analysis, accrual was robust, tumor biopsies were safe (<1% severe events), and profiling success was 87.3%. Actionable molecular alteration frequency met expectations, but assignment and enrollment lagged due to histology exclusions and mismatch of resources to demand. To address this lag, we revised estimates of mutation frequencies, increased screening sample size, added treatments, and improved assay throughput and efficiency (93.9% completion and 14-day turnaround). Conclusions The experiences in the design and implementation of the NCI-MATCH trial suggest that profiling from fresh tumor biopsies and assigning treatment can be performed efficiently in a large national network trial. The success of such trials necessitates a broad screening approach and many treatment options easily accessible to patients.

Abstract Purpose: The surface receptor MET is highly expressed on primary uveal melanoma; MET inhibitors demonstrated early clinical signals of efficacy in slowing uveal melanoma growth. The primary objective of our study was to compare the progression-free survival rate at 4 months (PFS4) of patients with uveal melanoma treated with cabozantinib or chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: Patients with metastatic uveal melanoma and RECIST measurable disease were randomized 2:1 to receive either cabozantinib (arm 1) versus temozolomide or dacarbazine (arm 2) with restaging imaging every two cycles. Cross-over from arm 2 to cabozantinib after progression was allowed (arm 2X). Available tumor specimens were analyzed by whole-exome sequencing (WES) and results were correlated with outcome. Results: Forty-six eligible patients were accrued with 31, 15, and 9 in arms 1, 2, and 2X, respectively. Median lines of prior therapy, including hepatic embolization, were two. Rates of PFS4 in arm 1 and arm 2 were 32.3% and 26.7% (P = 0.35), respectively, with median PFS time of 60 and 59 days (P = 0.964; HR = 0.99). Median overall survival (OS) was 6.4 months and 7.3 months (P = 0.580; HR = 1.21), respectively. Grade 3–4 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events were present in 61.3%, 46.7%, and 37.5% in arms 1, 2, and 2X, respectively. WES demonstrated a mean tumor mutational burden of 1.53 mutations/Mb and did not separate OS ≤ or >1 year (P = 0.14). Known mutations were identified by WES and novel mutations were nominated. Conclusions: MET/VEGFR blockade with cabozantinib demonstrated no improvement in PFS but an increase in toxicity relative to temozolomide/dacarbazine in metastatic uveal melanoma.

9506 Background: Survival is poor in mUM and treatment options are limited. MET kinase is over-expressed on UM and the MET inhibitor cabo showed activity in an early trial. Methods: A091201 was a 2:1 randomized phase II study testing progression-free survival (PFS) of cabo (60 mg daily) vs chemo (DTIC/TMZ). We studied baseline metastatic tumor samples (n = 19; 1 lung, 18 liver) by whole exome sequencing (WES) and RNAseq. We correlated data with OS and made comparisons for mUM vs. primary tumors from TCGA (n = 80). Results: 46 patients were accrued with 96% and 63% with liver metastases and elevated LDH, respectively. Toxicities were similar to prior reports of cabo and chemo. The trial stopped at interim analysis due to no difference in PFS (p = 0.964; HR = 0.99) or OS (p = 0.580; HR = 1.21). WES showed tumor mutational burden of 46±4 (mean±SEM) and did not separate OS at 1 year (p = 0.14, two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test) in A091201. Recurrent known mutations included GNAQ/11, SF3B1, BAP1; novel mutations included GOLGA6L10, PKD1L3, and FAM228B. Gene expression signatures differed significantly between A091201 and TCGA cohorts including MET signaling (p = 7.87e-22), T cell-inflamed (p = 0.004), homologous recombination deficiency (p = 0.004), proliferation (p = 0.009) and hypoxia (p = 5.2e-10) (two-sided Student’s t-test). Tumor immune cell enrichment analysis revealed significant differences with lower M1:M2 macrophage (p = 1.2e-10) and higher Tregs (p = 6.0E-21) in mUM relative to TCGA (two-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test). Epithelial-mesenchymal transition gene expression signature was significantly associated with worse OS in A091201 (p = 0.02) with angiogenesis signature trending toward significance (p = 0.21) (log-rank test). OS separated by differentially expressed genes with OS ≤ 1 year associating with increased expression of the angiogenesis/immune-associated molecule neuropilin 1. Conclusions: These results provide insights between primary and mUM indicating potential novel therapeutic approaches. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, T32GM007019, Exelixis. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; Clinical trial information: NCT01835145.

6020 Background: A subset of salivary gland cancer (SGCs) express the androgen receptor (AR). This phase II trial evaluated the anti-androgen enzalumatide (Astellas) for patients with AR+ SGCs. Methods: Locally advanced/unresectable or metastatic AR+ SGCs were enrolled (AR status was centrally confirmed). Prior therapy with AR-targeted drugs was allowed. Enzalutamide 160 mg orally once daily was given (1 cycle= 28 days). The primary endpoint was confirmed response (RR) according to RECIST v1.1 within the first 8 cycles. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A Simon-Optimal two-stage design was used to detect a 20% RR (vs. 5%) (alpha = 5%; beta = 90%). > 1 response(s) in the first 21 would trigger accrual to 41; > 4 responses would be considered promising. Results: 46 eligible patients (pts) were enrolled (40 M, 6 F; median age 65) in 22 months. In the first 21 pts, we initially had 2 confirmed PRs allowing for full study accrual, though one was later changed to stable disease. Among the 46 pts, 7 had PR as best response, though only 2 were confirmed within the first 8 cycles (4% (95% CI: 0.5-15%). Two other PRs did not count towards the primary endpoint due to 1) development beyond 8 cycles (cycles 12-18) and 2) a confirmatory scan completed <4 weeks apart. The other 3 pts with unconfirmed PR developed progression of disease (PD) after the first PR scan. 24 pts had stable disease; 15 pts PD as best response. Among 11 pts previously treated with AR-targeted therapy, best responses were 1 confirmed PR, 7 SD, 3 PD. With a median follow-up of 11.7 months (mo), OS at 12 mo was 66% (95% CI: 52-83%), PFS at 12 mo was 24% (95% CI: 14-42%), and median PFS was 5.5 mo (95% CI: 3.7-7.3). Conclusions: This is the first prospective trial evaluating an antiandrogen alone for AR+ SGCs. The failure to meet the protocol-defined measure of success was due in part to the lack of durability of initial responses. The clinical activity observed suggests the AR-dependence of AR+ SGCs, even among those previously treated with other hormonal therapies. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Astellas; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org. Clinical trial information: NCT02749903.