Back to Authors

Comis, Robert L.

Mayo Clinic

ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group

Citations 2

The Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) Trial: Lessons for Genomic Trial Design
Gray, Robert J. , Chen, Alice P. , Patton, David R. , Mitchell, Edith P. , Iafrate, A. John , Sklar, Jeffrey , Harris, Lyndsay N. , Rubinstein, Larry , Routbort, Mark, Coffey, Brent , Fu, Tony, Little, Richard F. , Marinucci, Donna M. , Catalano, Robert B., Magnan, Rick, Kibbe, Warren A. , Weil, Carol J. , Tricoli, James V. , Kumar, Shaji , Lih, Chih‐Jian, McCaskill‐Stevens, Worta , Takebe, Naoko, Datta, Vivekananda, Arteaga, Carlos L. , Abrams, Jeffrey S. , Comis, Robert L., O’Dwyer, Peter J , Conley, Barbara A. , Team, for the NCI-MATCH, Gray, Robert J , Patton, David R , Flaherty, Keith T. , Li, Shuli , Hamilton, Stanley R. , Williams, P. Mickey , McShane, Lisa M. , Sims, David J, Zwiebel, James A. , Alexander, Brian M. , Schwartz, Gary K. , Meric‐Bernstam, Funda , Caimi, Paolo F. , Takebe, Naoko , O’Dwyer, Peter J. , Team, for the NCI-MATCH, Rubinstein, Larry V

JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute | January 6, 2020 | Volume: 112 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1021-1029

10.1093/jnci/djz245 Get It

Abstract Background The proportion of tumors of various histologies that may respond to drugs targeted to molecular alterations is unknown. NCI-MATCH, a collaboration between ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group and the National Cancer Institute, was initiated to find efficacy signals by matching patients with refractory malignancies to treatment targeted to potential tumor molecular drivers regardless of cancer histology. Methods Trial development required assumptions about molecular target prevalence, accrual rates, treatment eligibility, and enrollment rates as well as consideration of logistical requirements. Central tumor profiling was performed with an investigational next-generation DNA–targeted sequencing assay of alterations in 143 genes, and protein expression of protein expression of phosphatase and tensin homolog, mutL homolog 1, mutS homolog 2, and RB transcriptional corepressor 1. Treatments were allocated with a validated computational platform (MATCHBOX). A preplanned interim analysis evaluated assumptions and feasibility in this novel trial. Results At interim analysis, accrual was robust, tumor biopsies were safe (<1% severe events), and profiling success was 87.3%. Actionable molecular alteration frequency met expectations, but assignment and enrollment lagged due to histology exclusions and mismatch of resources to demand. To address this lag, we revised estimates of mutation frequencies, increased screening sample size, added treatments, and improved assay throughput and efficiency (93.9% completion and 14-day turnaround). Conclusions The experiences in the design and implementation of the NCI-MATCH trial suggest that profiling from fresh tumor biopsies and assigning treatment can be performed efficiently in a large national network trial. The success of such trials necessitates a broad screening approach and many treatment options easily accessible to patients.
Priorities in Colorectal Cancer Research: Recommendations From the Gastrointestinal Scientific Leadership Council of the Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups
O’Dwyer, Peter J. , Haller, Daniel G. , Tepper, Joel E. , Ahnen, Dennis J. , Benson, Al B. , Rothenberg, Mace L., Petrelli, Nicholas J. , Lenz, Heinz‐Joseph, Diasio, Robert B. , Dubois, Raymond, Sargent, Daniel J. , Sloan, Jeff A. , Johnson, C. Daniel, Comis, Robert L., Eckhardt, Sabine , Hamilton, Stanley R. , O’Connell, Michael J. , Sargent, Daniel J

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 30, 2007 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 16 | Pages: 2313-2321

10.1200/jco.2006.08.6900 Get It

Emerging technologies have greatly expanded our ability to detect, characterize, and treat colorectal cancer. The Coalition of Cancer Cooperative Groups convened a multidisciplinary panel, the Scientific Leadership Council in GI cancer, to discuss and advise on the priorities and opportunities to advance current and future approaches into the clinical arena to impact most rapidly the morbidity and mortality from this disease. The Council's recommendations for research priorities are the result of engagement of community and academic oncologists, patient advocacy groups, and other stakeholders including the pharmaceutical industry and governmental agencies. We detail some key prospects for investigation in the areas of colon cancer detection, prevention, and surgical and medical management. Many are in early or definitive clinical trials, and a focus on rapid accrual is urged. The implementation of biology-directed laboratory investigations, both in association with ongoing clinical trials and as a separate developmental strategy for targeted therapies, is supported as the route to individualized therapy.