Finn, Quentin

AbstractBackgroundThere is limited information on biomarker‐defined Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathology in community‐recruited individuals of diverse racial and ethnic groups. Here, we assessed the association of race/ethnicity with baseline biomarkers and cognitive measures and hypothesized a lower impact of AD pathology in non‐Hispanic White (nHW) participants in the U.S. POINTER study clinical trial, which evaluates the benefits of a multidomain lifestyle intervention on cognition of community‐recruited at‐risk elderly individuals.MethodWe included 879 participants from the U.S. POINTER study enrolled in the imaging substudy (∼50% of participants) who self‐identified as nHW (n=644), African American/Black (AA/B, n=132), Asian (n=29), and Hispanic (n=74). Outcomes measures included global Aβ pathology (18F‐florbetaben), temporal meta‐ROI tau (18F‐MK‐6240), MRI‐measured white matter hyperintensity volume (WMH) volumes, global clinical dementia rating (gCDR), and global, executive, and memory standardized cognitive scores. The nHW participants were selected as reference. Power transformations normalized skewed distributions. Multivariable linear regressions include age, sex, education, Framingham risk score, and area deprivation index (ADI) as covariates.ResultAA/B harbored lower WMHs, and meta‐temporal tau ROI values. In the full model, 0.5 gCDR participants had higher centiloid values, were more likely to be AA/B and Hispanic, and had a greater burden of WMHs. In addition, higher centiloid values were associated with a 0.5 gCDR in all groups except for the AA/B participants. Hispanic, AA/B, and Asian participants had lower cognitive scores than the nHW group. A higher ADI score was associated with lower global and executive cognitive scores but not with WMH volume or Aβ centiloid score.ConclusionThe analyses of the community‐based U.S. POINTER indicate that AA/B individuals present differences in AD and related dementia biomarker values. nHW had higher fully adjusted cognitive scores. These results indicate a significant heterogeneity in the cognitive testing performance and biomarker values of individuals at risk for dementia in the community.

AbstractBackgroundThe HEAD study focuses on collecting an extensive dataset from various tau‐PET tracers, aiming to establish robust anchor values, which are essential for harmonizing tau‐PET measurements. Here, we aim to showcase the capability of converting 3D tau‐PET images into a common scale using the Universal Tau‐PET Scale, Uniτ (tau), and to use these 3D images to subsequently obtain ROIs as needed.MethodsWe assessed 185 individuals across the aging and AD spectrum from the HEAD study, with [18F]Flortaucipir and [18F]MK‐6240 tau‐PET tracers. Tau‐PET SUVR images were standardized to a common 8mm FWHM, using the inferior cerebellar gray matter as the reference region. We generated Uniτ Tau‐PET 3D images using a single formula based on Meta‐temporal parameters in two steps: first, within‐tracer anchoring based on young (<25 years) and cognitively impaired individuals; second, between‐tracer anchoring using a piecewise transformation from [18F]Flortaucipir to [18F]MK‐6240, with smoothing at the piecewise inflection point. Subsequently, we extracted mean Uniτ values from these 3D images for key ROIs, including meta‐temporal, mesial, temporo‐parietal, frontal, and Braak stages III‐VI. Finally, we correlated Uniτ values across ROIs between the two tracers to evaluate the accuracy of estimates from the voxel‐wise transformation.ResultsThe original SUVR images present large differences between the two tau‐PET tracers (Figure 1). However, upon applying the Uniτ piecewise transformation with smoothing to all brain voxels, we were able to reasonably harmonize these images to the Uniτ scale, substantially reducing visual variability. Notably, the mean Uniτ values for the ROIs extracted from these harmonized 3D tau‐PET brain images demonstrated a high level of association between the two tracers (Figure 2). Furthermore, estimates generated from ROIs or extracted from our 3D parametric Uniτ model yielded identical estimates (Figure 3).ConclusionThe strong associations between tracers after directly harmonizing 3D images to Uniτ scale using the piecewise transformation with smoothing, underscore the effectiveness of the proposed method. This approach provides a reliable and standardized way to compare tau‐PET data across different tracers. Our results indicate the feasibility of harmonizing 3D tau‐PET images without relying on pre‐established ROIs, overcoming the limitation of restricting the analysis to only few brain regions.