Sheashaa, Hesham

Background: HIV cardiomyopathy (HIV-CM) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have benefits in heart failure (HF), but their role in the specialized population of HIV-CM is poorly understood. Methods: Patients in the TriNetX Network with HIV-CM and SGLT2i therapy were compared to a propensity matched control group of patients with HIV-CM without SGLT2i use. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints included all-cause hospitalization, acute heart failure (HF), acute myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, cardiac arrest, new atrial fibrillation, and ventricular tachycardia. Results: In the total of 2,606 included patients, SGLT2i therapy was associated with significant reduction in all-cause mortality (HR 0.475, 95%CI 0.337–0.671) and all-cause hospitalization (HR 0.725, 95%CI 0.646–0.814). No significant differences were observed rates of acute HF (HR 1.111, 95% CI 0.957–1.289), myocardial infarction (HR 0.828, 95% CI 0.555-1.235), stroke (HR 0.995, 95% CI 0.747–1.327), cardiac arrest (HR 0.564, 95% CI 0.308-1.036), atrial fibrillation (HR 0.954, 95% CI 0.798–1.140), or ventricular tachycardia (HR 1.225, 95% CI 0.898–1.672). Conclusions: SGLT2i use was associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality and hospitalizations in patients with HIV-CM, but not cardiac specific outcomes.

Background: High serotonin from neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can result in carcinoid heart disease (CaHD) with severe valve dysfunction, often requiring valve replacement surgery. Lutetium-177 (Lu-177), a targeted radioactive isotope therapy, is increasingly utilized in the treatment of NETs; however, there is limited data on its impact on bioprosthetic heart valves (BHVs) in CaHD. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with stage IV metastatic NET who underwent BHV replacement at three tertiary centers in the United States. Patients were stratified by Lu-177 therapy, administered after valve replacement. A propensity matched cohort of CaHD patients with BHV who did not received Lu-177 was curated including age, sex, and baseline left ventricular ejection fraction. Serial transthoracic echocardiograms (TTEs) following surgery were evaluated for progression of BHV degeneration; rise in mean gradient or increase in grade of prosthetic/periprosthetic regurgitation (grade increase of ≥1 out of 5), from first TTE following surgery (TTE1) to most recent TTE (TTE2). Analysis was performed at the level of individual valves, recognizing that some patients had more than one valve implanted. To account for changes in Lu-177 exposure over time, we constructed a time-varying Cox proportional hazards model. Accounting for non-independence of multiple valves within the same patient, a clustered Cox model was fitted using robust standard errors. Mortality was compared between patients exposed to Lu-177 therapy and those not exposed. Results: 184 patients were identified, mean age 60.4 ± 10.3 years, 53.3 % male. Of these, 16 patients had Lu-177 therapy, with 45 individual BHVs within this group. Patients in the control group had a total of 60 BHVs. Across a median of 2.09 years [0.77-5.01] between TTE1 and TTE2, BHVs exposed to Lu-177 therapy demonstrated an increased risk of BHV degeneration (HR=2.44, 95% CI 1.05–5.69, p=0.038), accounting for the time between TTE1 and administration of Lu-177 and the non-independence of multiple BHVs within the same patient. There was no significant difference in mortality between the two cohorts (p=0.440). Conclusions: BHVs in patients with CaHD exposed to Lu-177 therapy demonstrated an increased risk of degeneration. These findings suggest an association between Lu-177 treatment and accelerated prosthetic valvular deterioration, warranting further investigation and close monitoring in this patient population.

Introduction: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels (≥30 mg/dL or ≥50 mg/dL) have been associated with increased risk of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including myocardial infarction and aortic stenosis. However, its association with all-cause mortality (ACM) in the setting of primary prevention remains unclear, with conflicting evidence regarding the cutoff associated with increased mortality risk. Objective: To assess the association between elevated Lp(a) and risk of ACM in the context of primary prevention. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included adult patients (≥18 years old) who had at least one measurement of Lp(a) at any of the three Mayo Clinic sites between 2007 and 2024, with no history of CVDs (i.e., coronary artery disease, ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack, or peripheral arterial disease) at the time of Lp(a) measurement. Lp(a) levels were categorized based on the following percentiles: ≤50th percentile (≤11.6 mg/dL), 50th to 80th percentiles (11.6–46.6 mg/dL), 80th to 90th percentiles (46.6–75 mg/dL), 90th to 95th percentiles (75–100 mg/dL), and >95th percentile (>100 mg/dL). Survival probabilities up to 15 years were compared across Lp(a) percentile categories using the Kaplan–Meier estimator and log-rank test. Additionally, univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were conducted to adjust for potential CV confounders and to quantify this association. Results: A total of 42,770 patients (median age: 53 years and 54% males) were included. We found no significant difference in survival probabilities between the Lp(a) categories based on the overall log-rank test (p=0.12; Figure 1A ). In the univariable analysis, only patients with Lp(a) >95th percentile (>100 mg/dL) had a statistically significant higher risk of ACM [hazard ratio (HR): 1.37; 95%CI: 1.07–1.74; p=0.012], compared to patients with Lp(a) <50th percentile (<11.6 mg/dL). Similarly, after adjusting for potential CV risk factors, only those with Lp(a) >95th percentile (>100 mg/dL) showed a significantly higher risk of ACM (adjusted HR: 1.37; 95%CI: 1.07–1.75; p=0.012, Figure 1B ). Conclusion: In the setting of primary prevention, only very high Lp(a) levels (≥100 mg/dL) were independently associated with increased risk of ACM, suggesting that higher Lp(a) thresholds may be more relevant for identifying individuals at increased risk of ACM than the conventional ≥50 mg/dL cutoff.

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed cancer therapy but may increase thrombotic risk through immune-mediated inflammation. While venous thromboembolism is a known complication in cancer, real-world data quantifying the incidence of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) specifically in ICI-treated patients remain limited. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of cancer patients treated with ICIs at a tertiary institution from 2011 to 2022. Electronic health records were reviewed to identify cases of PE and DVT, along with baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes at one-year follow-up. Rates of PE and DVT were compared to those reported in the literature. Time-dependent Cox regression analyses were performed to assess associations of PE and DVT with one-year all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF), defined as a new diagnosis and/or HF exacerbation/hospitalization. Results: Among patients treated with ICI, the incidence of PE and DVT was 10.6% and 8.3%, respectively. These rates are higher than those reported in several prior studies, where PE incidence in patients treated with ICI typically ranged from 3% to 6% and DVT incidence from 3% to 5%. A history of valve disease, lung cancer, and treatment with pembrolizumab or durvalumab were more frequently observed among patients with PE, whereas pembrolizumab use was most prevalent among those who developed DVT. In time-dependent Cox regression analyses, PE was significantly associated with increased one-year all-cause mortality (HR: 2.62, 95% CI: 2.12–3.23, p < 0.001) and showed a trend toward increased HF (HR: 1.63, 95% CI: 0.96–2.75, p = 0.070). Similarly, DVT was also associated with significantly higher one-year all-cause mortality (HR: 2.63, 95% CI: 2.10–3.31, p < 0.001) and a significantly greater risk of HF (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.03–3.15, p = 0.040). Conclusion: In this real-world cohort study, PE and DVT were more frequent than previously recognized in ICI-treated cancer patients and were associated with significantly increased risks of all-cause mortality and heart failure. Conditions such as valve disease, lung cancer, and specific ICI therapies (e.g., pembrolizumab or durvalumab) may help identify patients at higher thrombotic risk. These findings underscore the importance of vigilant thrombotic risk assessment and may support the need for proactive monitoring or prevention strategies in high-risk patients receiving ICI therapy.

Background: A key determinant of prognosis in pulmonary hypertension (PH) is the right ventricle’s (RV) ability to adapt to increased pulmonary vascular resistance. Consequently, markers of RV-pulmonary artery (PA) coupling may improve prognostic prediction in PH. The ratio of tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) to systolic PA pressure (sPAP) has been proposed as a surrogate for RV-PA coupling and a reliable prognostic marker, however, the existing data on the prognostic value of the ratio between RV longitudinal strain (RVLS) and sPAP as a surrogate for RV-PA coupling is scarce. Hypothesis: To evaluate the prognostic role of RVLS/RVSP in PH patients and to compare this novel marker with established markers of RV-PA coupling. Methods: This is a single-center study that included adult patients with PH classified as group I or IV, all of whom had undergone a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) within one year prior to the initiation of PH-specific treatment. Certified sonographers procured RV strain measurements using a specific software (Epsilon Imaging, Ann Arbor, MI). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the best cutoff for predicting all-cause mortality at one-year for RVLS/RVSP and TAPSE/RVSP. The association of RVLS/RVSP and TAPSE/RVSP with mortality at one year was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis (adjusted for REVEAL LITE 2.0 risk score). Results: A total of 160 patients were included with a median age of 67.2 (56.8, 73.7) years and 47 (29.2%) were male . ROC analysis revealed optimal cutoffs of 0.265 (AUC = 0.83) for RVLS/RVSP and 0.185 (AUC = 0.77) for TAPSE/RVSP to predict all-cause mortality at one year. One-year cumulative incidence of all-cause mortality was lower among patients with RVLS/RVSP ≥ 0.265 (0 % vs 13.7 %, p = 0.001) and patients with TAPSE/RVSP ≥ 0.185 (1.8 % vs 16.7 %, p = 0.001) (Figure 1) . In the multivariate analysis, RVLS/RVSP < 0.265 was associated with higher risk of mortality at one year (HR: 2.38, 95 % CI: 1.05 to 5.38, p = 0.036) while TAPSE/RVSP < 0.185 was not (HR: 2.01, 95 % CI: 0.93 to 4.31, p = 0.072). Conclusions: RVLS/ RVSP may be a valuable prognostic marker in PH patients and could outperform conventional TTE parameters as a surrogate for detecting RV-PA coupling.

Introduction: Mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (M-TEER) has emerged as a minimally invasive option for high-risk surgical candidates with severe and symptomatic mitral regurgitation (MR), but post-procedure residual mitral valve (MV) dysfunction remains a significant concern. This study evaluates the clinical utility of combining artificial intelligence applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) for diastolic dysfunction (DD) grading and the echocardiography-derived velocity time integral of the MV and left ventricular outflow tract ratio (VTIMV/LVOT) in predicting prognosis in patients post-M-TEER. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent M-TEER between 2014 and 2021 was conducted. Patients were categorized based on VTIMV/LVOT and ECG-AI scores into three groups: both normal parameters, either abnormal parameter, or both abnormal parameters to compare outcomes (mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], and the need for subsequent MV reintervention) using Kaplan–Meier analysis, multivariable Cox regression models, and net reclassification improvement. Results: Overall, 250 patients were included; the median age was 79.5 (IQR: 73.1, 84.6) and 66.4% were male. The combined abnormal VTIMV/LVOT (≥2.5) and ECG-AI score for DD (>1) was associated with higher risk of one-year mortality (adjusted HR: 4.56 [1.04–19.89], p = 0.044) and MACE (adjusted HR: 3.72 [1.09–12.72], p = 0.037) compared to patients with both normal parameters. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential additive value of integrating VTIMV/LVOT and ECG-AI scores as a prognostic tool for a personalized approach to the post-operative evaluation and risk stratification in M-TEER patients.

Aortic stenosis (AS), the most common valvular heart disease, is traditionally graded based on several echocardiographic quantitative parameters, such as aortic valve area (AVA), mean pressure gradient (MPG), and peak jet velocity (Vmax). This systematic review evaluates the clinical significance and prognostic implications of discordant high-gradient AS (DHG-AS), a distinct hemodynamic phenotype characterized by elevated MPG despite a preserved AVA (>1.0 cm2). Although often overlooked, DHG-AS presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges, as high gradients remain a strong predictor of adverse outcomes despite moderately reduced AVA. Sixty-three studies were included following rigorous selection and quality assessment of the key studies. Prognostic outcomes across five key studies were discrepant: some showed better survival in DHG-AS compared to concordant high-gradient AS (CHG-AS), while others reported similar or worse outcomes. For instance, a retrospective observational study including 3209 patients with AS found higher mortality in CHG-AS (unadjusted HR: 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1 to 1.7), whereas another retrospective multicenter study including 2724 patients with AS observed worse outcomes in DHG-AS (adjusted HR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.04 to 2.56). These discrepancies may stem from delays in intervention or heterogeneity in study populations. Despite the diagnostic ambiguity, the presence of high gradients warrants careful evaluation, aggressive risk stratification, and timely management. Current guidelines recommend a multimodal approach combining echocardiography, computed tomography (CT) calcium scoring, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) planimetry, and, when needed, catheterization. Anatomic AVA assessment by TEE, CT, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) can improve diagnostic accuracy by directly visualizing valve morphology and planimetry-based AVA, helping to clarify the true severity in discordant cases. However, these modalities are limited by factors such as image quality (especially with TEE), radiation exposure and contrast use (in CT), and availability or contraindications (in CMR). Management remains largely based on CHG-AS protocols, with intervention primarily guided by transvalvular gradient and symptom burden. The variability among the different guidelines in defining severity and therapeutic thresholds highlights the need for tailored approaches in DHG-AS. DHG-AS is clinically relevant and associated with substantial prognostic uncertainty. Timely recognition and individualized treatment could improve outcomes in this complex subgroup.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a well-established causal risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), as reported by multiple Mendelian randomization studies and large epidemiological studies. When elevated Lp(a) is combined with other risk factors, most notably elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), a synergistic atherogenic effect has been reported. However, the current literature is conflicting regarding how Lp(a) interacts in the context of controlled LDL-C levels (e.g., <70 mg/dL) and whether reducing LDL-C can modify the atherogenic effect of Lp(a). In some studies, elevated Lp(a) was still significantly associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events, despite controlled levels of LDL-C. In contrast, multiple studies have reported attenuation of the cardiovascular risk mediated by elevated Lp(a) with lower LDL-C levels. Moreover, the relationship between Lp(a) and triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein, and very low-density lipoprotein remains unclear. In this literature review, we summarize and discuss the current evidence regarding the interactions between Lp(a) and other lipid molecules, how they contribute to the pathogenesis of CVD, and future perspectives, particularly in the current era where promising targeted Lp(a)-lowering therapies are under development.