Apaydın, Nihal

ABSTRACTMost discussions about discrimination and bias in anatomical research papers have been limited to terminology relating to race/ethnicity and gender/sex. However, as editors of anatomical journals, the authors of this article have frequently observed broader instances of potential discrimination and bias within anatomical research. These often stem from differences among authors' backgrounds, traditions, cultures, religions, provenance/origins, and workplace affiliations. In view of the limited discourse on this topic, we seek in this article to establish a consensus among editors of anatomical journals and to propose new Guidelines Against Discrimination and Bias in Anatomical Research Papers (GDBARP). We have identified multiple factors that can contribute to discrimination and bias, underscoring the need for greater awareness and proactive measures. It is imperative in anatomical research to respect authors, reviewers, and editors regardless of their background, culture, traditions, sex, ethnicity, language, religion, or ethical perspectives.

ABSTRACT The Lazarus sign is a well‐documented spinal reflex observed in brain‐dead patients, characterized by involuntary upper limb movements that can resemble voluntary gestures. Initially described during the 1980s, this phenomenon has contributed to ongoing discussions about the physiological basis of spinal reflexes and their role in assessing brain death. The Lazarus sign was once considered a diagnostic challenge, but recent research reports confirm that it originates solely from the spinal cord, independent of brainstem or cortical activity. However, recent studies also suggest that spinal reflexes in brain‐dead patients, including the Lazarus sign, can be more variable than previously thought, occurring in multiple limb regions beyond the upper limbs. Prolonged survival in brain‐dead patients exhibiting the Lazarus sign has also raised new questions about its physiological significance. Its recognition has helped refine brain death criteria, ensuring accurate diagnoses and minimizing misinterpretations in critical care and organ donation settings. PubMed‐indexed studies and backward citations were reviewed. Studies were included if they explicitly described spinal reflexes in brain‐dead patients, examined neurophysiological mechanisms, or provided clinical observations on the Lazarus sign. Exclusion criteria included studies focusing solely on brainstem activity without considering spinal reflexes or case reports lacking detailed methodology. These investigations explored the prevalence, neurophysiological mechanisms, and clinical significance of the Lazarus sign. Research highlights its variable presentation, its occurrence in up to 40% of brain‐dead patients, and its potential to be misunderstood by families and healthcare providers. The sign does not indicate residual brain function, but it reinforces the need for clear communication in end‐of‐life care. Future research should focus on standardizing diagnostic protocols, educating clinicians, and addressing ethical concerns. Integrating this knowledge into brain death assessments will enhance clinical decision‐making and patient management.

ABSTRACT Nowadays, consent to use donor bodies for medical education and research is obtained from the body donors and their families before the donation. Recently, the International Federation of Associations of Anatomists (IFAA) published guidelines that could restrict the appearance of cadaveric images in commercial anatomical resources such as textbooks and other educational products. These guidelines state that the donor must expressly consent to using such images for this purpose. Cadaveric photos and drawings made from dissections of cadavers have been used in anatomy textbooks and atlases for hundreds of years. They are invaluable for anatomy students and clinical/surgical practitioners. The IFAA guidelines should not restrict the use of those older books; to do so would infringe the rights of those seeking knowledge from these resources. As the images in such textbooks and atlases are anonymized and are used for teaching and research, and the donors and their families are informed about this before the donation, we believe no additional consent is needed. It is impossible to separate educational from “commercial” usage entirely in any situation, e.g., publications from publishers and the use of cadavers in medical schools. Therefore, our best efforts to avoid unethical use of cadaveric images by following traditional consent processes are still needed so that more people will reap the benefits from them. As senior textbook/atlas authors/editors from over 10 countries, we believe that using cadaveric images in anatomy textbooks is appropriate, and no additional consent should be necessary. Such usage falls within the good faith of professionals using these invaluable gifts.