ABSTRACT Genetic variation at the TMEM106B locus has been associated with Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and related neurodegenerative phenotypes, yet its haplotypic architecture remains incompletely resolved. We refined the genetic landscape of TMEM106B by integrating AD-GWAS summary statistics (∼978K individuals) with haplotype analyses in 5,873 Dutch genomes including AD-cases, age-matched controls, and cognitively healthy centenarians. In addition to the known linkage disequilibrium (LD) block defining risk and protective haplotypes characterized by the amino acid substitution at residue 185 (Threonine/Serine), we identify a second conditionally independent LD block. Together these form four haplotypes (T1-T4), with T3 strongly enriched in centenarians. Long-read whole-genome sequencing in 493 individuals reveals haplotype-linked structural variation and methylation patterns, including a ∼19 Kbp genomic rearrangement carried by T3. These findings indicate that the TMEM106B locus comprises multiple haplotypes defined by methylation patterns and structural variants, offering insights into GWAS associations with AD risk and preserved cognition at extreme age.
An AluYb8 mobile element characterises the risk haplotype of the TMEM106B locus associated with neurodegeneration
AbstractBackgroundThe TMEM106B protein is critical for proper functioning of the endolysomal system, which is utilised by all cells to traffic and degrade molecular cargo. Genome‐wide association studies identified a haplotype in the TMEM106B gene that is associated with increased risk for Alzheimer’s disease (AD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and frontotemporal lobar degeneration with TAR DNA binding protein inclusions (FTLD‐TDP). However, the causal variant that drives the association has thus far remained elusive.MethodsWe generated long‐read whole‐genome sequencing data of 256 individuals, primarily from Dutch descent. We characterized SNPs and larger structural variants in the TMEM106B locus using de novo genome assembly.ResultsWe identified an insertion of an AluYb8 retrotransposon in the 3’ UTR of TMEM106B gene, that was in complete linkage with the TMEM106B risk‐SNP. AluYb8 retrotransposons have the propensity to propagate through our genomes by utilising a ‘copy‐paste’ mechanism, and once integrated can disrupt transcription and translation of nearby genes. However, propagation of retrotransposons can be suppressed by methylation of the insert and its surrounding regions. Indeed, we observed that the risk haplotype with the AluYb8 insertion, but not the protective haplotype, accumulated CpG islands over evolutionary time. Notably, we observed similar retrotransposon insertions in the 3’ UTR of TMEM106B orthologs in non‐primate species. This suggests a survival advantage, which may be explained by recent findings that TMEM106B is an entry‐receptor for specific viruses in lung‐tissue, such that SINE‐mediated downregulation of TMEM106B may limit viral infection‐load across species.ConclusionsWe speculate that AluYb8‐mediated downregulation of TMEM106B may be protective at younger ages in lung tissues, but that at advanced ages its downregulation in the brain may contribute to increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases. Furthermore, next to the supression of AluYb8 activation by DNA methylation, it may also be suppressed by TDP‐43, in its role in post‐translational RNA‐processing. This leads us to further speculate that age‐related demethylation and age‐related dysregulation of TDP‐43 may result in a negative feedback loop that ultimately reduces the endolysosomal activity in cells. We argue that such a mechanism would explain why increased age is among the strongest risk factors of neurodegenerative diseases.