Dratch, Laynie

Abstract The 21st Century Cures Act Final Rule (Final Rule) increases patient access to their health records but raises concerns about distress and misunderstanding of automatically released results and documentation. Little is known about genetic counselors' (GCs') experiences with the Final Rule. In Fall 2023, we conducted a cross‐sectional survey of US GCs about the Final Rule's perceived impact on practice and assessed if being the ordering versus non‐ordering provider for genetic testing affected perceptions of Final Rule‐related changes. GCs ( n = 102) reported demographic and workplace characteristics, institutional policy changes, workflow changes, and perceived patient harms and benefits due to the Final Rule. To compare ordering and non‐ordering providers, we conducted Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables and trend tests for ordinal variables. Open‐response questions elicited examples of positive and negative patient impacts, the effects of patient characteristics, and practice changes in response to the Final Rule. Twenty‐seven GCs were ordering providers and 66 were non‐ordering providers. Relative to ordering providers, non‐ordering providers expressed stronger agreement with statements indicating concern about the emotional impact on patients reviewing results or notes without support ( p = 0.002, 33% vs. 51% strongly agree), patients misunderstanding or misinterpreting results ( p = 0.025, 44% vs. 70% strongly agree), and patients contacting the inappropriate party to discuss results ( p = 0.023, 19% vs. 48% strongly agree). Agreement with the statement “patients have more knowledge/context/questions at our disclosure session due to previous results review” also differed by ordering provider status ( p = 0.007). In open responses, GCs expressed concerns about patients' strong emotional reactions, patients misinterpreting results, workflow disruptions, and widening health disparities. Benefits included patients' ability to be reassured, informed, or empowered earlier; ease of sharing health information; more efficient workflow due to the automatic release of results. These results emphasize the importance of clear communication within health systems and between patients and providers.

AbstractBackgroundAutonomic dysfunction has been linked to empathy deficits in symptomatic frontotemporal degeneration (FTD), but less is known about pre‐symptomatic FTD mutation carriers (preFTD+). Our prior work found that increasing resting heart rate (RHR) over time predicts decline in emotional empathy in preFTD+. Here, we replicate previous findings in a large, multi‐site consortium sample and assess relationships between RHR and empathy loss across disease stages.MethodRHR and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI) were obtained serially for up to 7 years in 348 preFTD+, 202 symptomatic FTD mutation carriers (FTD+), and 311 non‐carrier family members (FTD‐) enrolled in ALLFTD. IRI Perspective Taking (IRI‐PT) and Empathic Concern (IRI‐EC) subscales measured cognitive and emotional empathy, respectively. Separate multiple linear regressions related mutation status and annualized change in RHR to annualized change in IRI subscales and assessed interactions between RHR change and phenoconversion status among mutation carriers. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between change in RHR and phenoconversion among mutation carriers, and Wilcoxon signed‐rank tests were used to examine differences in change in RHR between all study groups.ResultIn asymptomatic participants (preFTD+ and FTD‐), increase in RHR over time was associated with greater decline in IRI‐EC (ß = ‐0.07, p<.001) and IRI‐PT (ß = ‐0.03, p = .011), regardless of mutation status. Among mutation carriers (preFTD+ and FTD+), increase in RHR was associated with greater decline in IRI‐EC (ß = ‐0.04, p = .041), and this effect was stronger in FTD+ compared to PreFTD+ (ß = ‐0.07, p = .038), while an increase in RHR was associated with decline in IRI‐PT only in FTD+ (ß = ‐0.07, p = .046). Change in RHR did not predict phenoconversion in mutation carriers (PreFTD+ and FTD+), but PreFTD+ showed less change in RHR over time relative to FTD+.ConclusionChanges in empathy in asymptomatic preFTD+ and FTD‐ are linked to variability in RHR regardless of genetic status, likely reflecting a non‐specific impact of autonomic functioning on empathy and prosocial behavior. In contrast, increasing RHR predicts decline in cognitive and emotional empathy in FTD mutation carriers but primarily after phenoconversion, suggesting that autonomic contributions to empathy in familial FTD increase with disease progression and could be an early marker of manifest disease.