Nelson, Benjamin Alan

Inconsistency in the calculation of time spent in moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) limits interstudy comparability and interpretation of surveillance data. This study assesses whether combining multiple individual methods results in a more accurate estimate of MVPA, while considering the influence of device brand and wear location. Participants (n = 30, age = 49.2 ± 19.5 years) wore two accelerometers (GENEActiv, ActiGraph) on each wrist during two laboratory visits. Individual classification methods (11 for left wrist, eight for right wrist) estimated minutes of MVPA using three approaches (cut-point, two-regression, and machine learning), two types of input (count and raw), and five epoch lengths (1, 5, 15, 30, and 60 s). The consensus estimate was calculated as the mean or median (due to skew) across all individual estimates. No individual or consensus estimates were statistically equivalent to direct observation (mean 38.2 min), with 81%–95% of individual methods overestimating MVPA. The best-performing individual methods were raw acceleration cut-points, with a bias of −3.2 to 2.4 min across devices and wrists. Correlation coefficients between individual methods and the criterion were .35–.71 for the left and .12–.67 for the right wrist, compared to .65–.70 and .58–.66 for consensus methods, respectively. Correlations between device brands were .23–.99 for individual methods and .70–.86 for consensus methods, while correlations between locations were .55–.86 and .73–.87, respectively. Better methods are required for estimating MVPA from wrist-worn accelerometers given the consistent overestimation of MVPA observed. While a consensus method for wrist-worn data was not able to fully resolve these issues, it improves interwrist or interbrand comparability.

Background: The aim of this study is to compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation versus closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of metacarpal fractures in relation to anatomic and surgical variables. Methods: Electronic medical records at two institutions were reviewed for patients who underwent surgical intervention for metacarpal fractures. Data were collected from those who underwent reduction and internal fixation with either plates or Kirschner wires (K-wires). Inclusion criteria included minimum postoperative follow-up of 60 days and age 18 years or older. Exclusion criteria included insufficient radiographic data, previously attempted closed reduction with immobilization, pathologic fracture mechanism, history of previous trauma or surgery to the affected bone, and fixation technique other than plate or K-wire. Results: We reviewed data for patients treated over a 22-year time period. Ultimately, 81 metacarpal shaft and neck fractures in 60 patients met inclusion criteria. Among all metacarpal fractures, complications were present in 39 (48.1%) cases. There were no significant associations between complication prevalence and hardware type. Revision surgery was required in 11 (13.6%) patients; there were no significant associations between revision procedures and hardware type. Postoperatively, all patients with imaging data had radiograph follow-up to assess union status. There was no significant association between time to union and hardware type. Conclusions: Outcomes showed no significant difference between plate and pin fixation for metacarpal shaft and neck fractures. These findings suggest that surgeons may have flexibility to decide on the type of operative intervention while considering patient-specific factors, such as the need for early mobilization.