Roy, Madison

Purpose: Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and symptoms of depression have increased health care utilization and lower quality of life. There is a knowledge gap regarding feasible and effective approaches for the management of depressive symptoms in patients with COPD. The objective of this randomized clinical trial sub-study is to determine whether 12-weeks of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) with health coaching is feasible and effective for improving depressive symptoms in patients with COPD. Methods: Patients with severe COPD and symptoms of depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9] ≥5 points) randomized to the intervention (N = 90) or control (N = 78) groups in the parent study were included. The primary outcome of this sub-study was the 12-week change in the PHQ-9 score. Secondary outcomes included dyspnea, fatigue, emotions, and mastery (self-management) as measured by the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) and daily physical activity and sleep measured by ActiGraph. Results: Home-based PR with health coaching was associated with improved measures of depression ( P = .07), dyspnea, fatigue, emotion, and mastery (self-management) ( P < .001). Being in the intervention group was associated with a higher odds of improving by the minimal clinically important difference on the PHQ-9 (OR = 2.10: 95% CI, 1.06-4.27), CRQ-Dyspnea (OR = 2.37: 95% CI, 1.11-5.26), CRQ-Fatigue (OR = 3.35: 95% CI, 1.59-7.35), CRQ-Emotions (OR = 4.59: 95% CI, 2.13-10.40), and CRQ-Mastery (OR = 3.36: 95% CI 1.60-7.28) after multivariable adjustment. The improvement in depression symptoms was maintained for 3 and 6 months after finishing the intervention. Conclusion: Home-based PR with health coaching is feasible and possibly effective in improving depressive symptoms and quality of life in patients with COPD and symptoms of depression.

Key Points Pediatric preemptive kidney transplantation rates in the United States vary by socioeconomic status (SES). The HOUsing-based index of SES, an individual-level SES measure derived from residential addresses, effectively predicts pediatric preemptive kidney transplant rates. Background Preemptive kidney transplantation in children is associated with better patient and graft survival compared with transplants after dialysis. However, preemptive kidney transplantation rates in children remain low. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on preemptive transplantation in children. Methods Our study included 173 Minnesota-resident pediatric kidney transplant recipients (younger than 18 years) transplanted at the University of Minnesota from 2010 to 2020. Using the HOUsing-based index of SES (HOUSES) index, a validated, individual SES measure based on housing units categorized into quartiles (Q1: lower SES; Q2–Q4: higher SES), we applied mixed-effects multivariable logistic models to examine the effects of HOUSES on preemptive kidney transplants and pretransplant dialysis duration. Results Of 173 pediatric kidney transplant recipients, 46 (26.6%) received a preemptive transplant, and of 109 recipients with dialysis duration data, 39 (35.8%) received dialysis for >1 year. After adjusting for age at kidney failure, sex, donor type, insurance type, and underlying cause of kidney failure, we observed significantly lower odds of preemptive transplantation among Q1 recipients compared with Q2–4 recipients (adjusted odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11 to 0.90; P = 0.03). Conclusions Using the HOUSES index, we found significant socioeconomic disparities in preemptive kidney transplantation rates among children.

Background. The limitations of conventional measures of socioeconomic status (SES) limit our ability to elucidate the role of SES as a key element of social determinants of health in kidney transplantation. This study’s objective was to use an innovative SES measure, the HOUsing-based SES measure (HOUSES) index, to examine the effects of social determinants of health on access to and outcomes of kidney transplantation. Methods. Our study included residents of Minnesota (age older than 18 y) who underwent kidney transplantation at a single center between 2010 and 2020. SES was determined using the HOUSES index, categorized into quartiles (Q1 for lower, Q2–Q4 for higher SES). We used mixed-effects multivariable logistic and Cox models to examine the effects of HOUSES on preemptive transplants, pretransplant dialysis duration, and death-censored graft loss, adjusting for covariates. Results. Among 1975 eligible patients, 29.4% received preemptive transplants, 34.9% underwent pretransplant dialysis for >3 y, and 15.1% experienced death-censored graft loss for a median follow-up of 7.15 (interquartile range, 4.25–11.38) y. Lower SES recipients (Q1) demonstrated decreased preemptive transplant likelihood (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.97; P = 0.03), longer dialysis duration (>3 y; aOR: 1.43; 95% CI, 1.01-2.03; P = 0.046), and higher death-censored graft loss (adjusted hazard ratio 1.36; 95% CI, 1.02-1.12; P = 0.036) versus higher SES recipients (Q2–Q4). Conclusions. We observed significant socioeconomic disparities in kidney transplant access, dialysis duration, and graft survival. The HOUSES index may be a promising tool for individual-based targeted interventions as it identifies SES on an individual rather than an area-level basis.