P-291. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) demonstrates high relatedness between carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates cultured from paired rectal swab and blood specimens among hospitalized patients in Greece
Abstract Background Intestinal colonization with carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) may be considered to inform empiric antibiotic selection for symptomatic infection. However, it is unclear how often gut colonizing CRE isolates are related to bloodstream isolates in hospitalized patients with bacteremia, especially in areas with high CRO prevalence. Minimum spanning tree of isolate relatedness Isolates and corresponding patient number (P1-P6) and rectal (R) or blood (B) specimen are noted within circles and allelic differences are numerated on linking lines between the circles. Group 1 and 3 isolates are possibly related to each other. Created with BioRender.com. Methods Patients with paired K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae isolates cultured from surveillance rectal specimens and clinically collected blood specimens collected within 1-8 days of each other between 2019-2023 were identified at 3 Greek hospitals. Isolates were frozen and shipped to a reference laboratory in the U.S for whole genome sequencing (WGS) using Illumina MiSeq. Assembly and core genome multilocus sequence typing (cgMLST) analysis were performed with Ridom SeqSphere+ software. Isolate relatedness was based on the total number of allelic differences between each isolate: < 15, related; 16-50, possibly related; ≥ 51, unrelated. Results One hundred eight paired isolates were identified from 54 unique patients; 6 pairs and 12 total isolates underwent cgMLST. In 5 of 6 pairs (83%), the rectal isolate was collected prior to the bloodstream isolate. Rectal and bloodstream isolates were related to one another in 5 of 6 (83%) pairs and were unrelated in 1 pair. Two pairs collected from 2 distinct patients admitted to the same intensive care unit (patients 2 and 3, Figure) were possibly related (16-50 allelic differences) to each other. Conclusion In this pilot evaluation conducted in a setting of high CRO prevalence, KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolated from paired rectal and blood specimens from individual patients were often related to each other, suggesting that intestinal colonization by this organism could inform empiric antibiotic treatment for bacteremia. Two patients from the same hospital unit had isolates that were possibly related, suggesting within hospital transmission. WGS is a powerful tool that can inform clinical and infection control practices. WGS of the remaining K. pneumoniae pairs and additional Acinetobacter baumannii pairs is ongoing. Disclosures Robin Patel, MD, I already disclosed so please pull from disclosure for other abstracts: Advisor/Consultant|I already disclosed so please pull from disclosure for other abstracts: Grant/Research Support|I already disclosed so please pull from disclosure for other abstracts: Honoraria
Impact of rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing for Gram-negative bacteremia varies by pathogen type and resistance: a secondary analysis of the RAPIDS GN trial
ABSTRACT In this secondary analysis of 386 subjects with Gram-negative bacteremia enrolled in the RAPIDS GN trial, rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing had a greater benefit on the management of bacteremia caused by antibiotic-resistant compared to antibiotic-susceptible isolates, especially for Escherichia coli, Klebsiella species , and Proteus species. IMPORTANCE Rapid blood culture diagnostics are costly, and their use has not demonstrated clear clinical benefit for patients with Gram-negative sepsis, possibly because prior trials did not enroll sufficient numbers of patients with antibiotic-resistant infections. This analysis of patients with sepsis previously enrolled in a randomized controlled clinical trial demonstrates that rapid susceptibility testing of bacteria from blood cultures had the greatest impact for patients with antibiotic-resistant infections. Specifically, after rapid testing results were reported, patients infected with resistant bacteria received appropriate antibiotic therapy more quickly than patients with susceptible bacteria. These findings highlight the need to evaluate blood culture diagnostics in areas with high antibiotic resistance where these diagnostics are likely to have the greatest impact.