Longitudinal Modeling of Pitching Workload and Countermovement Jump Performance as Determinants of Fastball Velocity and Consistency in Collegiate Baseball Pitchers
Abstract Burke, AA, Saine, ND, King, EL, Fields, JB, Jagim, AR, Miller, AD, Green, BC, and Jones, MT. Longitudinal modeling of pitching workload and countermovement jump performance as determinants of fastball velocity and consistency in collegiate baseball pitchers. J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000–000, 2026—Maintenance of four-seam fastball (FSFB) velocity across the baseball season is critical, yet the extent to which workload and neuromuscular status relate to velocity is unclear. Thus, aims of the current study were to assess the relationship between external pitching workload metrics and FSFB velocity; quantify within-season FSFB velocity; and examine how countermovement jump (CMJ) performance predicts FSFB velocity. Collegiate pitchers ( n = 8) completed weekly CMJ testing during a 15-week, 53-game season. Countermovement jump metrics included jump height (JH), reactive strength index–modified (RSImod), peak braking force, and peak propulsive force normalized to body mass. Workload variables (innings, total pitches, FSFB pitches) and FSFB velocity were evaluated via repeated measures correlation (RMCORR). A longitudinal heat map visualized velocity trends, and a hierarchical location–scale model assessed predictors of mean velocity and variance. Repeated measures correlation showed weak negative associations between FSFB velocity and innings ( r = −0.15, p = 0.11), total pitches ( r = −0.18, p = 0.05), and FSFB pitches ( r = −0.18, p = 0.05). Heat map analysis identified 3 distinct velocity clusters. Location model results indicated no predictors of mean velocity. The scale model showed JH ( γ = −0.060, p = 0.001) predicted reduced velocity variance, and RSImod ( γ = 3.800, p < 0.001) predicted increased variance. Findings suggest that velocity patterns varied across athletes, where greater workloads were negatively associated with FSFB pitch velocity. Further, CMJ performance related to velocity stability rather than mean velocity. Routine longitudinal monitoring and continued strength-power training are recommended to support FSFB velocity.
Influence of Individual Traits on Measurement Differences in Percent
Body Fat
Abstract The purpose of the current study was to identify the influence of individual characteristics on differences in body fat percentage between air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (change in body fat percentage) in 360 collegiate student-athletes. Body fat percentage was obtained from air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. A 2 (sex)×3 (Brozek body fat percentage, Siri body fat percentage, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry body fat percentage) analysis of variance was used to evaluate the difference between the body fat percentages obtained from air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry in men and women. The agreement between air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry was evaluated via Bland–Altman plot and linear regression. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the influence of sex, race, height, and body mass on the change in body fat percentages. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry yielded greater body fat percentages in both men (4.8±2.8; p < 0.001) and women (2.2±2.9; p < 0.001) compared to air displacement plethysmography measurements. Proportional and systematic biases were observed between air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Race, height, and mass were significant predictors of the body fat percentage difference between air displacement plethysmography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (R 2=0.445, p<0.001, and standard error of the estimate=2.527). The present study suggests that air displacement plethysmography underestimates body fat percentages when compared to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and this underestimation may not be the same for every athlete due to their individual characteristics.
Estimation of Whole-Body Bone Mineral Density Through Air Displacement Plethysmography in a Large Sample of Elite Athletes
Abstract Magee, MK, Fields, JB, Jagim, A, Lockard, B, Miller, A, Stroiney, D, and Jones, MT. Estimation of whole-body bone mineral density through air displacement plethysmography in a large sample of elite athletes. J Strength Cond Res 39(4): 427–432, 2025—Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used to determine bone mineral density (BMD) and body composition. Regulations and cost may limit DXA's utility in some athletic settings. Air displacement plethysmography (ADP), while able to measure body composition, does not measure BMD. The purpose was to evaluate the influence of body composition parameters obtained from ADP on BMD. Collegiate athletes (males, n = 153; females, n = 208) underwent ADP and DXA assessments. For ADP testing, the Brozek equation was used to estimate body fat percent (BF%) and fat-free mass (FFM) from body density. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry tests were completed to obtain BMD using the whole-body scan mode. Stepwise regression was conducted using age, body mass, height, sex, race, FFM (ADP), BF% (ADP), and sport type as independent variables. Total BMD (DXA) was the dependent variable. Accuracy and precision of the final equation were evaluated through Bland–Altman and linear regression. The final regression equation yielded an R 2 of 0.691 with race, mass, BF%, age, and sport type as significant predictors ( p < 0.05) of BMD. Bland–Altman and linear regression showed systematic {95% confidence interval [CI] (−0.619 to −0.360)} and proportional bias (95% CI [0.173–0.374]). Although an ADP-derived regression equation may not provide a precise prediction of BMD, it may be useful to establish risk for low BMD if DXA is unavailable. Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry may not be feasible for some athletic programs; therefore, an estimation equation for BMD derived from ADP values is advantageous for practitioners. This equation may assist in screening athletes for risk of low BMD.
A new estimation equation to assess body composition in an athletic population
Relationship of Individual Athlete External Load, Session Rating of Perceived Exertion, and Athlete Playing Status Across a Collegiate Women’s Basketball Season
External (EL) and internal (IL) load are commonly used methods used to quantify training load in team sports. Playing time and playing position may influence the training loads for specific athletes throughout a season. The purpose of the current study was to evaluate the effect of athlete playing status and individual in-season practices on EL and IL across a collegiate women’s basketball season. Female basketball athletes were classified as high-minute (HMA; ≥15 min/game) or low-minute (LMA; <15 min/game) and wore microsensors during 53 practices for a total of 583 data points. EL was obtained via an inertial measurement unit (IMU) device that contained a triaxial accelerometer to obtain three-dimensional positioning data. IL and strength training (ST) load were determined via session rating of perceived exertion (sRPE) to create a daily summated value. Descriptive statistics indicate that athletes experienced individual differences in EL, ST, and IL throughout the season. A growth model showed that HMAs experienced higher EL than LMAs at the start of the season for practices (90.21 AU). Across all athletes, IL increased across the season (40.11 AU) and for each 1 unit of change in EL, IL increased by 1.04 AU. Repeated measures correlations identified a large relationship between IL and EL (r = 0.51, p < 0.001). A location-scale model indicated that the within-person variability of IL across all athletes was 3.29 AU but was not due to athlete playing status. It is recommended to base in-season training on individual loads and game demands to promote athlete readiness and improved sport performance.