Dodick, David W.

Background Migraine is a highly prevalent, disabling, misunderstood, underdiagnosed, and undertreated neurological disease. It is a leading cause of productivity loss in the workplace. Methods This is the first large-scale company-wide headache education and evaluation program in the workplace. Results 73,432 (90.5%) Fujitsu employees participated. The prevalence of migraine was 16.7%, tension-type headache 40.7%, and cluster headache 0.5%. After completing the training, 82.9% of participants without headache said they would change their attitude towards colleagues with headache disorders and 72.5% of total participants said their understanding of headache changed. The proportion of employees who thought that headache had a significant impact on people’s lives increased from 46.8% to 70.6%; 2971 (4.1%) of all participants were interested in a virtual consultation with a headache specialist as part of the program, more than half of whom had not previously consulted for headache. Approximately 14.7 days per year of full productivity per employee with headache were gained resulting in an annual productivity saving per employee of US$4531. Conclusion This unique headache workplace program was associated with a high level of participation, an improvement in the understanding of migraine and attitude towards colleagues with migraine, reduction in disability and increased employee productivity, and decreased costs of lost productivity due to migraine. Workplace programs for migraine should be considered for all industry sectors.

Abstract Objective To assess cardiovascular (CV) safety of erenumab in clinical trial patients associated with degree of CV risk. Background Hypertension has been considered a theoretical risk associated with the inhibition of the calcitonin gene‐related peptide pathway in migraine management, particularly in a patient population with pre‐existing CV risk factors. Methods Data pooled from four double‐blind, randomized trials were used to assess blood pressure (BP) changes and CV safety in patients grouped based on 10‐year risk of cardiac, cerebrovascular, and peripheral artery disease as no‐risk‐factors, low‐risk (>0% to ≤10%), moderate‐risk (>10% to ≤20%), and high‐risk (>20%) categories. CV safety was assessed as ischemic cardiovascular and cerebrovascular adverse events (ICCAE). Results There was no apparent difference between placebo‐ ( N = 1032) and erenumab‐treatment groups (70 mg, N = 885; 140 mg, N = 504) in clinical worsening of BP category from baseline to Months 1–3 (14% [143/1032] placebo vs. 13% [114/885] and 14% [71/504] for erenumab 70 and 140 mg, respectively) regardless of baseline BP category. The adverse event (AE) profile of erenumab was similar across CV risk categories throughout the long‐term analysis. Erenumab‐treated patients with high and moderate 10‐year CV risk ( N = 107) did not experience any ICCAEs during the double‐blind treatment period; there was a single ICCAE (a cerebral dural venous sinus thrombosis) observed in the low‐risk erenumab group ( N = 273). There were no increases in AEs during the long‐term extensions of up to 5 years ( N = 2499; 3482 patient‐years of exposure to erenumab) with exposure‐adjusted incidence rates of cardio/cerebrovascular disorder AEs of 0.4, 0.5, 0.0, and 1.1 (per 100 patient‐years) for no risk factor ( N = 1805), low ( N = 492), moderate ( N = 121), and high ( N = 81) 10‐year CV risk groups, respectively. Conclusions Ischemic CV and cerebrovascular AEs were uncommon and the incidence rates were similar across the 10‐year CV risk categories. This analysis helps provide more detail on the CV safety of erenumab.

Abstract Objectives To capture patients' perspectives on migraine‐related cognitive symptoms during pre‐headache, headache, post‐headache, and interictal periods. Background Migraine‐related cognitive symptoms are reported by people with migraine both during and between attacks. Associated with disability, they are increasingly viewed as a priority target for treatment. The Migraine Clinical Outcome Assessment System (MiCOAS) project is focused on developing a patient‐centered core set of outcome measures for the evaluation of migraine treatments. The project focuses on incorporating the experience of people living with migraine and the outcomes most meaningful to them. This includes an examination of the presence and functional impact of migraine‐related cognitive symptoms and their perceived impact on quality of life and disability. Methods Forty individuals with self‐reported medically diagnosed migraine were recruited via iterative purposeful sampling for semi‐structured qualitative interviews conducted using audio‐only web conferencing. Thematic content analysis was performed to identify key concepts around migraine‐related cognitive symptoms. Recruitment continued until concept saturation was achieved. Results Participants described symptoms consistent with migraine‐related deficits in language/speech, sustained attention, executive function, and memory that manifest during pre‐headache (36/40 [90%] reported ≥1 cognitive feature), headache (35/40 [88%] reported ≥1 cognitive feature), post‐headache (27/40 [68%] reported ≥1 cognitive feature), and interictal periods (13/40 [33%] reported ≥1 cognitive feature). Among participants reporting cognitive symptoms during pre‐headache, 32/40 (81%) endorsed 2–5 cognitive symptoms. Findings were similar during the headache phase. Participants reported language/speech problems consistent with, for example, impairments in receptive language, expressive language, and articulation. Issues with sustained attention included fogginess, confusion/disorientation, and trouble with concentration/focus. Deficits in executive function included difficulty processing information and reduced capacity for planning and decision‐making. Memory issues were reported across all phases of the migraine attack. Conclusions This patient‐level qualitative study suggests that cognitive symptoms are common for persons with migraine, particularly in the pre‐headache and headache phases. These findings highlight the importance of assessing and ameliorating these cognitive problems.

Background Long-term data helps assess the consistency of efficacy, tolerability, and safety of acute treatment over repeated use for different attacks. Real-world studies help assess tolerability, safety, and efficacy in patients with possibly refractory chronic migraine, more comorbidities, other diseases such as cardiovascular diseases, and polypharmacy. Methods This is a narrative review of the long-term open-label and real-world studies of lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant for the acute treatment of migraine. Both manuscripts and abstracts were reviewed. Results The efficacy and tolerability of lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant are maintained over time. No significant cardiovascular adverse events were thought to be related to any of these medications. The rare instances of palpitations and/or tachycardia occurred within 48 hours of lasmiditan. One participant with a history of supraventricular tachycardia had sinus tachycardia thought to be related to ubrogepant which did not recur despite continued use. One case of thrombocytopenia and two cases of increased aspartate aminotransferase and alanine transaminase were thought to be possibly related, but the alanine transaminase and aspartate aminotransferase levels normalized despite continued use of ubrogepant. A case of first-degree atrioventricular block was considered possibly related to rimegepant. Acute use of rimegepant was associated with a decrease in monthly migraine days over time. The three medications were associated with improvement in function and/or productivity. Conclusion Long-term and real-world data of tolerability, safety and efficacy of lasmiditan, ubrogepant, and rimegepant is thus far consistent with prior studies, but more longitudinal data that clarifies long-term safety as well as consistency and predictors of response is needed.

Importance Trigeminal autonomic cephalalgias (TACs) comprise a unique collection of primary headache disorders characterized by moderate or severe unilateral pain, localized in in the area of distribution of the first branch of the trigeminal nerve, accompanied by cranial autonomic symptoms and signs. Most TACs are rare diseases, which hampers the possibility of performing randomized clinical trials and large studies. Therefore, knowledge of treatment efficacy must be based only on observational studies, rare disease registries, and case reports, where real-world data and evidence play an important role in health care decisions. Observations Chronic cluster headache is the most common of these disorders, and the literature offers some evidence from randomized clinical trials to support the use of pharmacologic and neurostimulation treatments. Galcanezumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide, was not effective at 3 months in a randomized clinical trial but showed efficacy at 12 months in a large case series. For the other TACs (ie, paroxysmal hemicrania, hemicrania continua, short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with conjunctival injection and tearing, and short-lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache attacks with cranial autonomic symptoms), only case reports and case series are available to guide physicians in everyday management. Conclusions and Relevance The accumulation of epidemiologic, pathophysiologic, natural history knowledge, and data from case series and small controlled trials, especially over the past 20 years from investigators around the world, has added to the previously limited evidence and has helped advance and inform the treatment approach to rare TACs, which can be extremely challenging for clinicians.

Abstract Repeated stress produces hyperalgesic priming in preclinical models, but underlying mechanisms remain uncertain. As stress engages kappa opioid receptors (KORs), we hypothesized that repeated administration of KOR agonists might mimic, in part, stress-induced hyperalgesic priming. The potential contribution of circulating prolactin (PRL) and dysregulation of the expression of PRL receptor (PRLR) isoforms in sensory neurons after KOR agonist administration was also investigated. Mice received 3 daily doses of U-69593 or nalfurafine as a “first-hit” stimulus followed by assessment of periorbital tactile allodynia. Sixteen days after the first KOR agonist administration, animals received a subthreshold dose of inhalational umbellulone, a TRPA1 agonist, as the second-hit stimulus and periorbital allodynia was assessed. Cabergoline, a dopamine D2 receptor agonist, was used to inhibit circulating PRL in additional cohorts. Prolactin receptor isoforms were quantified in the V1 region of the trigeminal ganglion after repeated doses of U-69593. In both sexes, KOR agonists increased circulating PRL and produced allodynia that resolved within 14 days. Hyperalgesic priming, revealed by umbellulone-induced allodynia in animals previously treated with the KOR agonists, also occurred in both sexes. However, repeated U-69593 downregulated the PRLR long isoform in trigeminal neurons only in female mice. Umbellulone-induced allodynia was prevented by cabergoline co-treatment during priming with KOR agonists in female, but not male, mice. Hyperalgesic priming therefore occurs in both sexes after either biased or nonbiased KOR agonists. However, a PRL/PRLR-dependence is observed only in female nociceptors possibly contributing to pain in stress-related pain disorders in females.

AbstractBackgroundChronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a neurodegenerative disease that is characterized by perivascular foci of phosphorylated tau (p‐tau) notably in the depths of sulci, with varying patterns in the cerebral cortex. Prior studies show elevated flortaucipir (FTP) PET binding in former American professional football players(PRO). However, the association of p‐tau with clinical measures remains unclear using regional FTP SUVR as early signs of CTE related tau pathology. Graph theory (GT) takes advantages of the spatial variability in p‐tau load and allows the integration of regional measures to define GT based measures. Here we examine the GT based measures in two CTE cohorts to evaluate their utility in assessing p‐tau related pathology in CTE.MethodThe graph procedure was optimized in FTP PET images in a group of 26 PRO with reported cognitive and/or behavorial symptoms and 30 asymptomatic controls without a history of traumatic brain injury (the DETECT Study) and identified the GT measure, entorhinal tau strength, as the target metric with the best group separation between PRO and controls. The optimized graph procedures were then applied to the DIAGNOSE CTE Research Project dataset (99 former PRO, 51 former college football players [COL], and 52 controls without exposure to repetitive head impacts [CTL]) and we examined entorhinal tau strength’s ability to differentiate the exposure groups and relationship to consensus based diagnoses of Traumatic Encephalopathy Syndrome (TES), the clinical syndrome associated with CTE.ResultEntorhinal tau strength was significantly different among the three exposure groups (p=0.0001) similar to regional SUVR measures (Figure 1). Regional SUVR did not differentiate players (PRO+COL) with and without TES, while entorhinal tau strength approached although did not reach significance (Figure 2). Entorhinal tau strength is the only FTP measure that showed significant differences (p=0.006) between those players with cognitive impairment and players without (Figure 3).ConclusionWhile there is still considerable overlap in between‐group measurements, GT based entorhinal tau strength, is potentially more sensitive in detecting tau changes in players with and without TES. Additional studies are necessary to clarify the value of this new measure in detecting underlying CTE pathology.

Abstract Background Treatment wearing‐off has been reported for calcitonin gene‐related peptide‐pathway monoclonal antibodies, including erenumab, specifically in the last week of the monthly dosing cycle. Objective We sought to determine the consistency of erenumab effect throughout the monthly treatment cycle. Methods In this post hoc analysis of four pivotal double‐blind, randomized controlled studies of erenumab in episodic and chronic migraine, we assessed wearing‐off based on change in weekly migraine days at week 4 versus average over weeks 1–3 in each monthly dosing cycle. Analyses were conducted at each monthly dosing cycle in all patients, in responders (≥50% reduction in weekly migraine days), and in consistent responders (response in ≥2monthly cycles). Results There was no evidence of wearing‐off in the full study populations of two global studies (N = 946 and N = 656) and two Japan studies (N = 475 and N = 261). In the full study population, mean change in weekly migraine days at week 4 compared with the average over week 1–3 ranged from 0.15 days improvement to 0.19 days worsening in the placebo group and 0.08 days improvement to 0.20 days worsening in the erenumab groups. A subgroup of responders experienced wearing‐off, but the extent of wearing‐off did not differ between erenumab and placebo groups. The mean change in weekly migraine days at week 4 compared with the average over weeks 1–3 ranged from 0.34 to 0.61 days worsening in the placebo group and 0.27 to 0.78 days worsening in the erenumab groups. Few patients had persistent wearing‐off in ≥2 consecutive monthly treatment cycles. For erenumab‐treated responders, serum erenumab concentrations were similar among patients experiencing wearing‐off and those maintaining response. Conclusion No systematic wearing‐off with erenumab was identified. Further research is needed to determine if wearing‐off reported for some patients in clinical practice reflects a true treatment response pattern or normal fluctuations in migraine frequency.

AbstractIntroductionThe presentation, risk factors, and etiologies of white matter hyperintensities (WMH) in people exposed to repetitive head impacts are unknown. We examined the burden and distribution of WMH, and their association with years of play, age of first exposure, and clinical function in former American football players.MethodsA total of 149 former football players and 53 asymptomatic unexposed participants (all men, 45–74 years) completed fluid‐attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging, neuropsychological testing, and self‐report neuropsychiatric measures. Lesion Segmentation Toolbox estimated WMH. Analyses were performed in the total sample and stratified by age 60.ResultsIn older but not younger participants, former football players had greater total, frontal, temporal, and parietal log‐WMH compared to asymptomatic unexposed men. In older but not younger former football players, greater log‐WMH was associated with younger age of first exposure to football and worse executive function.DiscussionIn older former football players, WMH may have unique presentations, risk factors, and etiologies.Highlights Older but not younger former football players had greater total, frontal, temporal, and parietal lobe white matter hyperintensities (WMH) compared to same‐age asymptomatic unexposed men. Younger age of first exposure to football was associated with greater WMH in older but not younger former American football players. In former football players, greater WMH was associated with worse executive function and verbal memory.