Reicher, Barry

ABSTRACT Introduction/Aims Eplontersen is approved in multiple regions for adults with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv‐PN). This exploratory analysis was conducted to evaluate the treatment effect of eplontersen by sex in patients with ATTRv‐PN from the NEURO‐TTRansform trial (NCT04136184). Methods Participants in NEURO‐TTRansform who received ≥ 1 dose of eplontersen were included in this analysis; participants in the inotersen reference group who switched to eplontersen were excluded. Eplontersen was evaluated in the overall patient population and in a subgroup with cardiomyopathy. Change from baseline in the NEURO‐TTRansform primary endpoints of serum transthyretin (TTR) levels to Week 65, modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 (mNIS+7) composite score to Week 66, and Norfolk Quality of Life‐Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QoL‐DN) total score to Week 66 were evaluated. A historical placebo group from the NEURO‐TTR trial (NCT01737398) was included as a control. Results The eplontersen group comprised 100 (69.4%) male and 44 (30.6%) female patients. The placebo group comprised 41 (68.3%) male and 19 (31.7%) female patients. For both sexes, treatment with eplontersen decreased serum TTR levels by > 80% (vs. reductions of 3%–13% with placebo), maintained mNIS+7 scores, and improved Norfolk QoL‐DN scores (vs. deterioration with placebo). The treatment effect of eplontersen was similar in male and female patients with cardiomyopathy. Discussion Eplontersen halted neuropathy impairment and improved quality of life versus placebo to a similar degree in both male and female patients with ATTRv‐PN, including those with cardiomyopathy. These findings support the use of eplontersen as an effective treatment for ATTRv‐PN regardless of sex.

ABSTRACT Background This exploratory analysis of the NEURO‐TTRansform Phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy of eplontersen in patients with hereditary transthyretin (ATTRv) amyloidosis with polyneuropathy by genetic variant. Methods Changes from baseline in NEURO‐TTRansform primary endpoints serum transthyretin (TTR) at Week 65, modified Neuropathy Impairment Score+7 (mNIS+7) composite score, and Norfolk Quality of Life‐Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QoL‐DN) total score at Week 66 were evaluated in patients with early‐onset (aged < 50 years) and late‐onset (aged ≥ 50 years) Val30Met (p.Val50Met) or non‐Val30Met ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy. Secondary endpoints from NEURO‐TTRansform were also evaluated by genetic variant. Results In total, 144 patients with early‐onset ( n = 54) or late‐onset ( n = 31) Val30Met or non‐Val30Met ( n = 59), ATTRv amyloidosis with polyneuropathy were randomized to eplontersen. A further 60 patients from NEURO‐TTR with early‐onset ( n = 16) or late‐onset ( n = 17) Val30Met or non‐Val30Met ( n = 27), served as a historical placebo group. The mean percentage difference (95% confidence interval) in serum TTR was −79.9 (−87.8, −72.0), −85.0 (−93.3, −76.6), and −70.6 (−77.7, −63.5) with eplontersen versus placebo in the early‐ and late‐onset Val30Met, and non‐Val30Met groups, respectively. Across subgroups, the change from baseline to Week 66 in mNIS+7 composite score was generally well maintained, and the Norfolk QoL‐DN total score improved with eplontersen versus worsening with placebo. The Polyneuropathy Disability score was maintained in most patients. From baseline to Week 65, the modified body mass index was maintained with eplontersen compared to a marked reduction (worsening) for placebo. Conclusions Findings were suggestive of consistent benefits in reducing neuropathy impairment and improving QoL with eplontersen versus historical placebo, across TTR variants. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04136184, NCT01737398

ABSTRACTIntroduction/AimsThe degree of change in neuropathic impairment and quality of life (QoL) that is clinically meaningful to patients with hereditary transthyretin amyloidosis with polyneuropathy (ATTRv‐PN) is not established. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude of treatment differences that are meaningful to patients in measures of neuropathy and QoL and to determine whether eplontersen achieved a meaningful improvement versus placebo.MethodsData from the NEURO‐TTRansform trial on patients with ATTRv‐PN treated with eplontersen (n = 141) or historical placebo (n = 59) were used. Anchor‐based approaches were used to estimate thresholds for meaningful differences in the modified Neuropathy Impairment Score +7 (mNIS+7) composite score, Norfolk QoL‐Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QoL‐DN) total score, Neuropathy Symptoms and Change (NSC) total score, and modified body mass index (mBMI). Differences between the least squares means of the treatment groups were analyzed.ResultsMeaningful improvement in mNIS+7 was estimated as −4.0 points and deterioration as 1.8 points. The estimated ranges of meaningful improvement and deterioration in Norfolk QoL‐DN were −12.8 to −4.0 points, and 5.9 to 14.7 points, respectively. For NSC, ranges were −2.4 to −1.3 points for meaningful improvement, and 0.6 to 5.8 points for deterioration. The estimated meaningful improvement in mBMI was 9.8 kg/m2 × g/L and deterioration was −40.9 kg/m2 × g/L. Improvements in each measure with eplontersen versus placebo were greater than the estimates of meaningful differences.DiscussionEplontersen demonstrated a clinically meaningful effect on neuropathic impairment, QoL, and nutritional status. Such estimates have implications for clinical practice and trials.