Sah, Biki Kumar

Background: Invasive management strategies for myocardial infarction (MI) and multivessel coronary artery disease (MV-CAD) include complete revascularization (successful revascularization of all coronary artery lesions or segments ≥1.5 mm in diameter with ≥50% diameter stenosis) and incomplete revascularization (including culprit-only revascularization). However, non-culprit lesion management strategy in elderly patients remains ambiguous due to a lack of representation of this cohort in randomized trials (RCTs) and higher cardiovascular complication risks. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes of elderly individuals (age ≥65 years) with MI and MV-CAD submitted to complete vs. incomplete (including culprit-only) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The outcomes of interest were all-cause death, cardiovascular mortality, recurrent MI, and any revascularization. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model. Results: Thirteen studies (3 RCTs, 1 post hoc analysis of previous RCT, and 9 observational studies) with a total of 12,289 patients were included. Complete revascularization (CR) was performed in 5,232 patients, while 7,057 patients underwent incomplete revascularization (IR). The mean age was 80.46 years for CR and 80.73 years for IR and the mean durations of follow-ups ranged from 12-78 months. As compared to IR, the CR group was associated with significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.71, p<0.0001) (Figure 1), cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.77, p=0.0005), recurrent MI (OR 0.62, 95% CI .47 to 0.81, p=0.0005) (Figure 2), and any revascularization (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.86, p=0.01). Conclusion: Among elderly patients with MI and MV-CAD, CR is associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, recurrent MI, and any revascularization.

Background: Ambiguity surrounds invasive management of non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-MI) in older adults (≥70 years), and the number of elderly patients undergoing invasive treatment in clinical practice remains relatively low. Data comparing the efficacy of invasive versus conservative medical management for NSTEMI in this population is conflicting due to the under-representation or exclusion of the older population from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the long-term outcomes of invasive versus conservative medical strategies in older patients with NSTEMI. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the odds ratio (OR) with 95% CI for the individual endpoints of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned revascularization, and readmission for cardiovascular causes. Results: A total of nine RCTs with 4,336 patients (Invasive: 2,368; Control: 1,968) with median follow-ups ranging from 6-63.6 months were included. Compared with a conservative strategy, an invasive strategy was associated with a significantly decreased risk of recurrent MI (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.47-0.81; p<0.001) (Figure 1) and unplanned revascularization (OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25-0.56; p<0.001). There was no difference in all-cause mortality (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.39-1.35; p=0.42) (Figure 2), CV mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43-1.23; p=0.23), or readmission for cardiovascular causes (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.63-2.33; p=0.57) between invasive and conservative management strategies. Conclusion: In older patients ≥70 years old with NSTE-MI, an invasive strategy reduced the risk of recurrent MI and revascularization when compared with conservative management. However invasive strategy did not offer any benefit in mortality or cardiac-cause related readmission over conservative management.