Ostlie, Sarah E.

Objective To describe the potential applications of awake cochlear implantation (CI). Patients Adult patients with sensorineural hearing loss who qualify for CI. Interventions CI under local anesthesia, without any form of systemic analgesia or anesthesia. Main Outcome Measures Acoustic hearing preservation, subjective patient report of cochlear implant pitch matching, and subjective patient report of cochlear implant sound quality. Results Four illustrative cases are presented, highlighting the potential uses of CI performed under local anesthesia for optimizing outcomes in hearing preservation, implant pitch matching, and implant sound quality. Conclusions CI under local anesthesia allows surgeons to use real-time patient feedback during electrode array insertion to minimize intracochlear trauma, particularly in cases where hearing preservation is a goal of CI, and to potentially improve implant performance by optimizing pitch matching and sound quality.

Objective To report the feasibility and potential utility of monitoring acoustic hearing on awake patients using intraoperative behavioral responses to threshold and suprathreshold stimuli while undergoing cochlear implantation (CI) under local anesthesia, without any form of sedation. Study Design Retrospective review of the first five cases performed by one surgeon. Setting Tertiary care academic medical center. Patients Adult patients with residual acoustic hearing undergoing CI. Interventions CI under local anesthesia, without any form of sedation. Main Outcome Measures Procedural tolerance, reliability of intraoperative pure tone threshold and suprathreshold audiometry, and correlation of intraoperative findings with early postoperative residual hearing. Results Five ears in four patients underwent CI, including three males and one female, with a median age of 61 years. Intraoperatively, patients reported reliable behavioral responses to pure tone threshold and suprathreshold stimuli and provided real-time feedback on perceived stimulus change to the surgeon just prior to, during, and immediately following electrode insertion. All patients were able to complete the operation under local anesthesia. During electrode insertion, three cases reported no change and two cases reported diminished stimulus perception that reversed with limited electrode pull back near terminal insertion. Immediate postoperative audiograms demonstrated preservation of bone conduction thresholds within 10 dB of their preoperative baseline for all cases, suggesting hearing preservation. Three-month postoperative AzBio in quiet scores were available for two patients, measuring 45% and 94%, respectively. Conclusions This report describes the feasibility of intraoperative behavioral audiometry during CI under local anesthesia, using patient feedback during electrode insertion to optimize hearing preservation surgery. Akin to other surgical subspecialties that use real-time patient feedback where objective intraoperative measures of neurofunction are imperfect, we demonstrate feasibility and potential utility of live acoustic monitoring during CI.