Rodriguez, Gloria M.

Background: There is a spectrum of facial paralysis patient presentations from complete flaccid facial paralysis (CFFP) to facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome (FARS). Objective: To objectively compare how laypersons direct attention to faces with different facial paralysis subtypes using eye-tracking technology. Methods: Lay observers freely gazed at standardized videos of 24 individuals’ faces as follows: 8 with CFFP, 8 with FARS, and 8 nonparalyzed Controls performing common facial expressions. Eye-tracking measured observers’ gaze and extracted data as time in milliseconds looking at facial subsites. Mixed effects regression was used for comparative analyses. Results: A total of 85 observers completed the study. For faces at rest, measurable differences in gaze patterns were noted for CFFP faces (more attention spent on nonparalyzed hemiface), whereas FARS and Control faces showed similar symmetric gaze patterns. With dynamic movement (smiling and brow-elevation), gaze patterns for both CFFP and FARS faces became altered and asymmetrical compared with Control faces. Conclusions: Faces with CFFP and FARS are viewed differently by casual observers, which has implications for patient care and future research. While CFFP showed gaze alterations (compared with Control) in both rest and facial expression states, FARS caused gaze alterations only with facial movement.

Background: Facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome is characterized by aberrant facial muscle reinnervation after facial nerve injury producing facial synkinesis, hypertonicity, and muscle spasm. Objective: To systematically review the surgical treatments for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome and assess their effectiveness as measured by patient-reported outcomes, physician-graded outcomes, or computer-automated grading systems. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Texts reporting outcomes of any surgical treatment for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome from 2003 to 2023 were included. Results: After screening, 25 studies with 731 patients were included. Surgical procedures included selective neurectomy (SN), selective myectomy (SM), cross-facial nerve graft, masseter nerve transfer, and gracilis muscle transfer. All surgical techniques and combinations showed significant improvement in at least one clinical outcome measure from baseline ( p < 0.05), although one study found no significant improvement. Thirty different outcome measures were used, the most common being the FaCE and eFACE scales (seven studies each). Conclusions: All surgical procedures in this review yield improved clinical outcome measures for facial aberrant reinnervation syndrome, with SN and SM being the dominant surgical treatments. Standardized outcome assessment and more nuanced patient evaluation are necessary to determine the most effective surgical treatments.