King, Anne L.

ABSTRACTBackgroundThere is a known association between common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) and granulomas in multiple organ systems, including the skin, lung, liver, and spleen. Rubella virus has also been detected within cutaneous granulomas in both immunocompetent and immunocompromised hosts. We present a retrospective case series of patients with CVID and granulomatous skin disease and describe the spectrum of clinical and histopathologic features, including the status of rubella virus in the cutaneous granulomas.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed the clinical and histopathological characteristics of patients diagnosed with CVID at our institution, with cutaneous findings and skin biopsies available for review between 1990 and 2023, demonstrating granulomatous inflammation.ResultsEight patients met the inclusion criteria. The most common histopathologic pattern was palisaded granulomatous inflammation, seen in five of eight cases. Three cases showed strictly sarcoidal granulomas. Background inflammation was peri‐granulomatous (8/8) and the predominant background inflammatory cell type was lymphocytic (6/8). Rubella virus testing was performed for seven of eight cases and found to be positive in one case.ConclusionCutaneous granulomatous disease in CVID can present with a spectrum of clinical morphologies, granulomatous patterns, and variable rubella virus persistence. Dermatopathologists should be aware of the spectrum of findings when considering cutaneous CVID–related granulomatous disease in the differential diagnosis.

Background: Maculopapular cutaneous mastocytosis (MPCM) is a rare disorder characterized by a pathologic accumulation of mast cells in the skin, which may or may not be accompanied by systemic mastocytosis. Diagnosis of MPCM on skin biopsy can be challenging because the findings may be subtle. Although mast cell density in MPCM has been reported, data informing a proposed cutoff for diagnosis and diagnostic criteria are limited. Methods: We identified adult patients diagnosed with MPCM and urticarial tissue reaction/chronic urticaria on skin biopsy and compared the mast cell and eosinophil counts per 1 mm2 in 10 cases each of MPCM, chronic urticaria, and normal skin from routine biopsies. All slides were stained with CD117, and CD117-positive mast cells were counted per 1 mm2 using digital microscopy. Eosinophils were counted on hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides per 1 mm2 using digital microscopy. Results: The median number of mast cells per 1 mm2 was significantly higher in MPCM than in cases of urticaria and normal skin/control tissue (177.3 vs. 26.8 vs. 47.8 mast cell per mm2, respectively; P ≤ 0.001). The calculated “cut point” for mastocytosis versus chronic urticaria and normal skin was 66 mast cells per 1 mm2, whereas the value for controls versus urticaria was 37 mast cells per 1 mm2. Eosinophils had similar density in MPCM and urticaria, and their presence was significant in the differentiation of MPCM and urticaria from normal tissue. Conclusions: This study adds to the literature by providing objective mast cell density data to distinguish challenging cases of cutaneous mastocytosis from urticarial reactions and normal skin. Future studies could explore the development of computer-aided estimations of cellular density with more extensive comparison with other inflammatory conditions to translate our findings more readily into clinical practice.