Back to Authors

Karbhari, Nishika

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3360-6733

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 15

P17.34.B BELZUTIFAN IN CLINICAL PRACTICE: OUTCOMES AND SAFETY IN A REAL-WORLD COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH VHL-ASSOCIATED NEOPLASMS
Galloway, Taylor , Schultz, Sydney , Thomsen, Anna, Ruff, Michael W. , Uhm, Joon H. , Carabenciov, Ivan D. , Jones, James E., Caron, Samantha, Iezzi, Raymond , Mrugała, Maciej M. , Porter, A B, Pagliaro, Lance C. , Dronca, Roxana , Pichurin, Pavel N. , Sonbol, Bassam Bassam, Riegert‐Johnson, Douglas L. , Dhamija, Rhadika, Orme, Jacob J. , Halfdanarson, Thor R, Hobday, Timothy J. , Patrick, M., Ser, Merve Hazal , Karbhari, Nishika , Neth, Bryan J. , Lachance, Daniel Honore , Riaz, Irbaz Bin , Borad, Mitesh J. , Patrick, M W, Sener, Uğur

Neuro-Oncology | October 3, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_3 | Pages: iii163-iii163

10.1093/neuonc/noaf193.550 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a hereditary cancer syndrome characterized by development of multiple neoplasms, including central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastomas, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), and retinal hemangioblastomas. Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2-alpha (HIF-2α) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in treating VHL-associated tumors. This study evaluates our institutional experience with belzutifan in patients with VHL-related tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study across three Mayo Clinic sites, including patients aged ≥18 years with genetically confirmed VHL disease who received belzutifan between October 2021 and March 2025. Clinical/radiological data, and adverse events (AEs) were extracted from electronic health records. Tumor responses were assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria for RCC, pNET, CNS hemangioblastoma. Retinal hemangioblastoma responses were evaluated through ophthalmologic assessments. RESULTS Forty-five patients were included (median age 44 58% female). Sixty-seven percent had RCC, 91% had CNS hemangioblastomas, 53% had pNETs, and 62% had retinal hemangioblastomas. The median duration of belzutifan therapy was 22.6 months (range 1.0-41.4 months). Among patients with RCC (n=26), overall response rate (ORR) was 19% and median time to best response (MTBR) was 7.4 months. Five patients had partial response (PR), 15 had stable disease (SD), and 1 had progressive disease (PD). For CNS hemangioblastomas (n=41), ORR was 12%, MTBR was 6.2 months. 5 patients had PR, 30 had SD, and none had PD. For pNET (n=17), ORR was 41%, MTBR was 8.2 months. One patient had CR, 6 patients had PR, 6 had SD, none had PD. For retinal hemangioblastomas (n=28), 6 (21%) showed improvement, 9 (32%) remained stable, and 3 (11%) showed progression. MTBR was 6.7 months. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 98% of patients. Common AEs included anemia (89%), fatigue (80%), hypoxia (18%), and headache (13%). Grade 3 AEs were observed in 20% of patients, including anemia (7%), hypoxia (9%), fatigue (4%), pneumonitis (2%), loss of consciousness (2%). One patient experienced a grade 4 event (status epilepticus). Anemia management involved iron supplementation (n=11), RBC transfusion (n=3), dose reduction (n=2), treatment holiday (n=8), permanent discontinuation (n=1). Hypoxia management included dose reduction (n=1), treatment holiday (n=3), discontinuation (n=1). CONCLUSION Belzutifan shows clinical activity across various VHL-associated neoplasms in real-world practice, with a manageable safety profile. The lower ORR compared to the phase III trial may reflect differences in baseline disease, including lower tumor burden in our cohort. These findings support its continued use in VHL disease, with attention to monitoring and managing treatment-related AEs.
Immunotherapy for High-Grade Gliomas
Karbhari, Nishika , Frechette, K.M., Burns, Terry C. , Campian, Jian , Breen, William G. , Sener, Uğur , Lehrer, Eric J. , Frechette, Kelsey M , Sener, Ugur , Burns, Terry C , Karbhari, Nishika , Parney, Ian F.

Cancers | June 2, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 1849

10.3390/cancers17111849 Get It

Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs), particularly glioblastoma (GBM), are associated with exceptionally high mortality and inevitable recurrence. In considering novel treatment options for these devastating diseases, immunotherapies represent promising candidates. Immunotherapies have demonstrated efficacy for several advanced tumors outside the central nervous system, highlighting a potential role for these agents in treating HGGs. However, multiple challenges to immunotherapy efficacy have tempered therapeutic benefit in practice, including local and systemic immunosuppression, intratumoral heterogeneity, and various mechanisms of intrinsic and acquired resistance. In the past 30 years, diverse immunotherapeutic subclasses have been assessed for benefit against HGGs. Methods: We performed a PubMed search for randomized clinical trials performed within the last 30 years evaluating the following immunotherapy agents for high-grade gliomas: immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, oncologic viruses, cytokines, and CAR T-cells. The present review offers a critical analysis of key pre-clinical and clinical trials that have shaped the immunotherapy landscape for high-grade gliomas over the past two decades. Results/Conclusions: Across the different immunotherapeutic methods and modalities explored thus far, a recurring theme emerges: while therapeutic strategies with a compelling conceptual basis are continually under development and even demonstrate a benefit in preclinical and early-phase trials, larger and later-phase trials consistently fail to produce concordantly significant outcomes. To date, no large-scale clinical trial has demonstrated a benefit of sufficient consequence to change practice. Continued critical appraisal of the strengths and pitfalls of prior investigative work, optimization of treatment development and delivery, and innovative approaches to combination therapy design will collectively be integral to future therapeutic advancement.
Retifanlimab with bevacizumab and hypofractionated radiotherapy to treat recurrent glioblastoma.
Karbhari, Nishika , Geyer, Susan M. , Chheda, Milan G. , Ruff, Michael W. , Kizilbash, Sani H. , Uhm, Joon H. , Neth, Bryan J. , Lehrer, Eric J. , Breen, William G. , Yan, Elizabeth , Mahajan, Anita , Brown, Paul D. , Campian, Jian , Neth, Byran J. , Kizilbash, Sani H , Karbhari, Nishika , Ulrich, Angela, Sherman, Wendy , Ensign, Shannon P. Fortin , Strowd, Roy E. , Sener, Uğur , Galanis, Evanthia

Journal of Clinical Oncology | May 28, 2025 | Volume: 43 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: No page available

10.1200/jco.2025.43.16_suppl.tps2092 Get It

TPS2092 Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain malignancy in adults. GBM is universally recurrent and associated with dismal outcomes. Re-irradiation (reRT) is ideal for evaluating combination therapy for recurrent GBM (rGBM) due to its multifactorial mechanism of action, including downstream immunomodulatory activity. RT (especially multi-fraction) increases immunogenicity in preclinical models by promoting immune activation, immune migration, and antigen uptake. Additionally, a recent study demonstrated enhanced PD-L1 expression in the glioma tumor microenvironment (TME) following RT, and combining stereotactic RT with a PD-1 inhibitor improved survival in murine models. Retifanlimab is a humanized monoclonal anti-PD1 IgG4 antibody that received FDA approval for adults with metastatic or recurrent locally advanced Merkel cell carcinoma. Bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF antibody, is a treatment for radiation necrosis/cerebral edema with less immune suppression than corticosteroids. In a previous Phase 2 study, hypofractionated RT (HFRT), retifanlimab, and bevacizumab was associated with a 9-month overall survival (OS) rate of 71.4%. To demonstrate the efficacy of this regimen compared to HFRT and bevacizumab, we have designed a new randomized controlled Phase 2 trial. We hypothesize that combination reRT with retifanlimab will produce a more robust anti-tumor immune response and improve OS compared to reRT without retifanlimab. Methods: This is a multicenter, open-label, randomized, controlled Phase 2 study of retifanlimab, bevacizumab, and HFRT for adult patients with rGBM. Patients are randomized 1:1 to the experimental (bevacizumab + retifanlimab + HFRT) or control cohort (bevacizumab + HFRT). Key eligibility criteria include age ≥ 18 years, Karnofsky performance status ≥ 60, ≥ 4 months since administration of any prior bevacizumab, and dexamethasone dose ≤ 4 mg at the time of randomization. The primary endpoint is 9-month OS. Secondary endpoints include OS, progression-free survival, objective response rate, neurologic assessment by NANO criteria, and adverse events profile. Protocol treatment will continue up to two years, or until progression or intolerable toxicity. Survival follow up will continue every two months, up to four years. Seven of the planned 94 patients have been enrolled as of submission on 1/28/25. Clinical trial #: NCT06160206. Funding provided by Incyte. Clinical trial information: NCT06160206 .
Therapeutic Targets in Glioblastoma: Molecular Pathways, Emerging Strategies, and Future Directions
Tang, Justin , Karbhari, Nishika , Campian, Jian , Karbhari, Nishika

Cells | March 26, 2025 | Volume: 14 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 494

10.3390/cells14070494 Get It

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, characterized by rapid growth, invasive infiltration into surrounding brain tissue, and resistance to conventional therapies. Despite advancements in surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, median survival remains approximately 15 months, underscoring the urgent need for innovative treatments. Key considerations informing treatment development include oncogenic genetic and epigenetic alterations that may dually serve as therapeutic targets and facilitate treatment resistance. Various immunotherapeutic strategies have been explored and continue to be refined for their anti-tumor potential. Technical aspects of drug delivery and blood–brain barrier (BBB) penetration have been addressed through novel vehicles and techniques including the incorporation of nanotechnology. Molecular profiling has emerged as an important tool to individualize treatment where applicable, and to identify patient populations with the most drug sensitivity. The goal of this review is to describe the spectrum of potential GBM therapeutic targets, and to provide an overview of key trial outcomes. Altogether, the progress of clinical and preclinical work must be critically evaluated in order to develop therapies for GBM with the strongest therapeutic efficacy.
Marine-Derived Therapeutics for the Management of Glioblastoma: A Case Series and Comprehensive Review of the Literature
Karbhari, Nishika , Khagi, Simon , Karbhari, Nishika

Onco | November 5, 2024 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 369-380

10.3390/onco4040026 Get It

Introduction: Glioblastoma is a fatal intracranial neoplasm that is refractory to treatment, with inevitable disease recurrence and progression to death. Marine-derived compounds, including those found in nutraceutical products, may provide therapeutic benefit in the setting of glioblastoma. We present two patient cases whose courses demonstrate a compelling role for marine-derived products in the management of glioblastoma. Cases: Case 1 describes a patient with MGMT promoter unmethylated glioblastoma who went on to complete standard of care chemoradiation along with concurrent use of a majority sea cucumber (MSC) blend known as SeaCare® (SeaCare, Torrington, CT, USA). Her survival of over 2 years significantly exceeds the recognized median survival time of glioblastoma. Case 2 describes a patient with a complicated course who experienced dramatic improvement after the initiation of the MSC blend, with an exceptional survival time of over 4 years post-diagnosis. Discussion: The mechanisms of marine-derived products that underlie these dramatic clinical effects are likely multifaceted but may hinge on the modification of the tumor immune microenvironment and suppression of tumorigenic effects. Specifically, the change in tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) within the tumor microenvironment is central to this complex interplay. Conclusions: Ultimately, the use of marine products in the treatment of glioblastoma may present a novel and promising therapeutic strategy that warrants further investigation.