Mashkoor, Yusra

Purpose: To systematically review the literature on the effectiveness, safety, and long-term outcomes of genicular artery embolization (GAE) for knee joint osteoarthritis (OA) associated pain. Materials and Methods: After registering the protocol with the PROSPERO database, a search was conducted from inception until July 31, 2023, in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ScienceDirect databases to gather studies evaluating GAE’s safety and efficacy in knee OA. A total of 4979 studies were identified and evaluated against the inclusion criteria. Data on study characteristics, success parameters, and adverse events were collected and synthesized. Results: Twenty-three studies, primarily single-center prospective studies with a total of 657 patients, were included. Most studies reported a 100% technical success rates, except one study reporting a rate of 84.2%. Clinical success rates, defined variably across studies, ranged from 30% to 100%, depending on the study’s follow-up period and outcome measures. The most frequent adverse events included skin discoloration without an ulcer (15.6%, n = 98) and transient post-procedural knee pain (10.2%, n = 64). Most studies were rated as fair in terms of quality, but the lack of robust randomized controlled trials highlighted the need for further comparative studies to standardize outcome reporting. Conclusion: GAE appears to be a promising option for knee OA pain, particularly for patients unresponsive to conservative treatments or ineligible for surgery. High-quality studies are needed to confirm long-term effectiveness and standardize outcome measures. Clinical Impact This study highlights the safety and efficacy of genicular artery embolization as a minimally invasive treatment for knee osteoarthritis, particularly in patients who are unresponsive to conservative treatments or unsuitable for surgery. By targeting neovascularization and reducing inflammation, genicular artery embolization provides pain relief and functional improvement. Clinicians can consider genicular artery embolization as an alternative to surgery for mild-to-moderate OA, offering a lower adverse event rate and faster recovery.

Background: Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) is a multifactorial complication following repair of Stanford Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) with an alarmingly high incidence, varying from 20 to 77%. Postoperative AKI following life-threatening disease tends to be much more complex. However, the exact role of postprocedural AKI in the prognosis of patients undergoing TAAD repair has not been elucidated. Aims: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the prognostic significance of postprocedural AKI in patients undergoing TAAD repair. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS databases. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality with several secondary endpoints. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using Review Manager software. Statistical significance was set at p <0.05. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed for all outcomes. Results: Our analysis included 21 studies comprising 10396 patients. Patients with AKI exhibited a significantly higher risk of 30-day mortality (RR=3.98; 95% CI: 3.04-5.22; p<0.00001; I 2 =57%), stroke (RR= 2.05; 95% CI: 1.68-2.50; p<0.00001; I 2 =32%), dialysis requirement (RR= 32.9; 95% CI: 10.39-104.24; p<0.00001; I 2 =90%) (Figure 1), cardiovascular complications (RR= 2.85; 95% CI: 1.65-4.92; p<0.0002; I 2 =85%), sepsis (RR= 4.92; 95% CI: 2.62-9.24; p<0.00001; I 2 =64%), and re-exploration for bleeding (RR=2.46; 95%CI: 1.79-3.39; p<0.00001; I 2 =58%) compared to those without AKI (Figure 2). Conclusion: Patients with AKI demonstrated a significantly increased risk of mortality, stroke, need for dialysis, sepsis, postoperative cardiovascular complications, and re-exploration for bleeding. Further prospective studies are required to better understand the prevention strategies and long-term effects on prognosis of AKI post-repair for TAAD.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) frequently complicates the repair of Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD). This systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis aimed to elucidate the prognostic impact of AKI in these patients. A literature search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar identified relevant studies on the predictors and outcomes of AKI following TAAD repair. The primary endpoint was 30-day mortality; secondary endpoints included stroke, dialysis/continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), and other complications. Random-effects meta-analyses were used, with significance set at P < 0.05. Twenty-one studies (10 396 patients) were analyzed. AKI was associated with higher risks of 30-day mortality (risk ratio = 3.98), stroke (risk ratio = 2.05), dialysis/CRRT (risk ratio = 32.91), cardiovascular (risk ratio = 2.85) and respiratory complications (risk ratio = 2.13), sepsis (risk ratio = 4.92), and re-exploration for bleeding (risk ratio = 2.46). No significant differences were noted in sternal wound infection, tracheostomy, paraplegia, or hepatic failure. AKI significantly increases mortality, morbidity, hospital, and ICU stay duration in TAAD repair patients.