Chuzhyk, Olena

Importance Suicide is a leading cause of death among young people and an escalating public health crisis. Objective To assess the effectiveness and harms of available treatments for suicidal thoughts and behaviors among youths at heightened risk for suicide. Evidence Review A systematic review was conducted searching databases including MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Scopus, and various gray literature sources from January 1, 2000, to September 26, 2024. We included randomized clinical trials, comparative observational studies, and before-after studies of psychosocial interventions, pharmacologic interventions, neurotherapeutics, emerging therapies, and combination therapies. Eligible patients were youths (aged 5-24 years) with heightened risk for suicide, adolescents from racial and ethnic minority groups known to be at increased risk of suicide, or those exposed to crime or violence. Pairs of independent reviewers selected and appraised studies. Findings This review included 65 studies (33 randomized clinical trials, 13 comparative observational studies, and 19 before-after studies) reporting on 14 534 patients (median age, 15.1 years; 75.1% female patients). Psychosocial interventions comprised psychotherapy interventions (33 studies; cognitive behavioral therapy, dialectical behavioral therapy, collaborative assessment and management of suicidality, dynamic deconstructive psychotherapy, attachment-based family therapy, and family-focused therapy), acute (ie, 1-4 sessions or contacts) psychosocial interventions (19 studies; safety planning, family-based crisis management, motivational interviewing crisis interventions, continuity of care after crisis, and brief adjunctive treatments), and school- or community-based psychosocial interventions (13 studies; social network interventions, school-based skills interventions, suicide awareness or gatekeeper programs, and community-based, culturally tailored adjunct programs). Dialectical behavior therapy showed moderate strength of evidence for reducing suicidal ideation. Other categories of psychosocial treatments showed insufficient to low strength of evidence for reducing suicidal outcomes. None of the studies evaluated adverse events. The evidence base on pharmacologic treatment for youths at risk of suicide was largely nonexistent. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review found that the current evidence on available interventions targeting youths at heightened risk of suicide is uncertain. Medication, neurotherapeutics, and emerging therapies remain unstudied among this population. The limited evidence base calls for the development of novel, developmentally and trauma-informed treatments, as well as multilevel interventions to target the increasing suicide risk among youths.

Abstract Disclosure: M. Salama: None. R. Basmaci: None. T. Rajjo: None. O. Chuzhyk: None. A.N. Lteif: None. A. Al Nofal: None. Objective: Heightened societal acceptance of transgender youth and increased awareness of their unmet medical needs have led to a rise in referrals for hormonal therapy. There is limited literature available on the metabolic outcomes of hormone therapy on transgender youth. We investigated how the different metabolic markers of cardiovascular disease change after the initiation of gender-affirming hormonal therapy in transgender adolescents. Methods: A Retrospective, observational cohort study based on chart review of all children with gender dysphoria (under 18 years of age) who were evaluated in the Pediatric Endocrinology Clinic in a tertiary care center between January 2015 and December 2022. Children's demographic information, baseline weight, height, BMI, hematocrit, lipid profile, ALT, prolactin, and HbA1C levels were obtained before and after the initiation of gender-affirming hormonal therapy. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was employed for paired analysis, while the chi-square test was used as appropriate. Results: We identified 106 transgender youth who were included in the analysis, with a median age at the start of hormonal therapy of 16 years (IQR: 15-17); comprising 68 trans-males (64%) and 38 trans-females (36%). The median treatment duration was 34 months (IQR: 18-54). Among trans-males, ALT levels increased post-treatment (mean difference 6.851 U/L, p < 0.001), as did BMI Z scores (mean difference 0.257, p < 0.001) and LDL-C (mean difference 12.734 mg/dl, p = 0.002), triglycerides (mean difference 10.18 mg/dl, p = 0.009), non-HDL-C (mean difference 12.8 mg/dl, p = 0.002), and total cholesterol (mean difference 10.18 mg/dl, p = 0.02). No significant differences were observed in HbA1C and HDL-C post-treatment. Among transfemales, BMI Z-scores were higher post-treatment (mean difference 0.27, p = 0.007), with increased total cholesterol (mean difference 19.88 mg/dl, p = 0.008), LDL-C (mean difference 12.6 mg/dl, p = 0.02), and HDL-C (mean difference 11.38 mg/dl, p < 0.001). Other variables did not significantly differ pre-and post-treatment. Ten transfemales with measured prolactin levels pre- and post-treatment showed no statistically significant differences. Conclusion: This pilot study revealed increased BMI Z scores following the commencement of hormone therapy in both trans-male and trans-female youths. Moreover, masculinizing treatment led to increased ALT levels. Furthermore, the cardiometabolic profile exhibited diverse alterations, particularly higher LDL-C levels in both cohorts. These findings underscore the necessity for close monitoring of these parameters during the treatment of transgender youth. Larger prospective randomized controlled trials are essential to comprehensively assess the impact of gender-affirming therapy on transgender youth. Presentation: 6/2/2024