Rausen, Michelle

OBJECTIVE: Volatile anesthetics (VAs) are gaining renewed interest as a sedation strategy in the intensive care, offering an alternative to traditional IV agents. VAs provide several pharmacologic advantages, including rapid onset and offset, minimal systemic metabolism, and favorable recovery profiles. Advances in delivery systems enabled the safe and practical administration of volatile agents in the ICU. Thus, we aimed to describe the pharmacology and safety aspects of inhaled agents as well as the systems designed to deliver VAs in the ICU. DATA SOURCES: Relevant literature was identified through PubMed and MEDLINE databases. STUDY SELECTION: Original research, review articles, commentaries, and guidelines addressing safety, efficacy, and use of VAs in adult ICU patients were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were reviewed by the authors, with key findings summarized and organized by pharmacologic properties, delivery systems, and safety domains. DATA SYNTHESIS: VAs are halogenated hydrocarbons whose mechanism of action is not fully understood. Although the CNS is the primary site of action, the end-tidal concentration of exhaled anesthetic is used to monitor clinical effects such as immobility to a noxious stimulus. Inhaled agents have unique pharmacokinetics, minimal metabolisms, and distinct recovery. The side effect profile is also unique, with malignant hyperthermia being the most feared, yet rare complication. Two systems for inhalational sedation delivery are available internationally, with one currently under evaluation in the United States. The systems are composed of a miniature vaporizer, delivery controller, and a monitor. The systems have distinct safety considerations, such as tidal volume limits. CONCLUSIONS: VAs can be used as sedative agents in the ICU. This article comprehensively reviews the pharmacology of VAs along with their safety profile and describes the structure and function of miniature vaporizers currently available on the world market.

Respiratory Therapists (RTs) are indispensable members of the critical care team, yet their participation in the design and facilitation simulation-based training (SBT) remains significantly underrepresented. SBT provides healthcare professionals a risk-free environment to develop and maintain clinical and team skills, prepare for uncommon, high-risk scenarios and receive real-time feedback. This review examines critical contributions of RTs, encompassing their expertise in invasive procedures, mechanical ventilation management, and the burgeoning role of Advanced Practice Respiratory Therapists (APRTs). We explore the professional evolution of critical care and the parallel advancements in simulation technology, creating opportunities to enhance the training of all healthcare professionals. RTs possess unique clinical and technical skills ideally suited for the design and facilitation of critical care simulations. Their inclusion offers a powerful means to improve team training and patient outcomes. Integrating RTs into simulation programs has proven challenging. Resource limitations and staffing constraints require a multifaceted solution including dedicated full-time equivalents (FTEs) in simulation programs, specialized training in simulation pedagogy, and fostering robust interprofessional collaboration opportunities for RTs. Research demonstrating the return on investment (ROI) of integrating RTs into simulation is lacking, but remains crucial to securing the necessary resources and support. Research should focus on quantifiable improvements in trainee performance, team dynamics, and patient safety metrics. By fully integrating RTs into SBT, healthcare institutions can significantly enhance the quality of critical care training, fostering improved interprofessional teamwork, leading to better patient outcomes. This strategic investment in RT participation in SBT will yield substantial returns in improved healthcare delivery.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to establish a set of guiding principles for data sharing and harmonization in critical care, focusing on the use of real-world data (RWD) and real-world evidence (RWE) to improve patient outcomes and research efficacy. The principles were developed through a systematic literature review and a modified Delphi process, with the goal of enhancing data accessibility, standardization, and interoperability across critical care settings. DATA SOURCES: Data sources included a comprehensive search of peer-reviewed literature, specifically studies related to the use of RWD and RWE in healthcare, guidelines, best practices, and recommendations on data sharing and harmonization. A total of 8150 articles were initially identified through databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science, with 257 studies meeting inclusion criteria. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria focused on publications discussing health-related informatics, recommendations for RWD/RWE usage, data sharing, and harmonization principles. Exclusion criteria ruled out non-human studies, case studies, conference abstracts, and articles published before 2013, as well as those not available in English. DATA EXTRACTION: From the 257 selected studies, 322 statements were extracted. After removing irrelevant definitions and off-topic content, 232 statements underwent content validation and thematic analysis. These statements were then consolidated into 24 candidate guiding principles after rigorous review and consensus-building among the expert panel. DATA SYNTHESIS: A three-phase modified Delphi process was employed, involving a conceptualization group, a review group, and a Delphi group. In phase 1, experts identified key themes and search terms for the systematic review. Phase 2 involved validating and refining the prospective guiding principles, while phase 3 employed a Delphi panel to rate principles on acceptability, importance, and feasibility. This process resulted in 24 guiding principles, with high consensus achieved in rounds 2 and 3 on their relevance and applicability. CONCLUSIONS: The systematic review and Delphi process resulted in 24 guiding principles to improve data sharing and harmonization in critical care. These principles address challenges across the data lifecycle, including generation, storage, access, and usage of RWD and RWE. This framework is designed to promote more effective and equitable data practices, with relevance for the development of artificial intelligence-based decision support tools and clinical research. The principles are intended to guide the responsible use of data science in critical care, with emphasis on ethics and equity, while acknowledging the variability of resources across settings.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to summarize the most significant and impactful publications describing the pharmacotherapeutic care of critically ill patients in 2023. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE and the Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials and prospective studies of adult critically ill patients assessing a pharmacotherapeutic intervention and reporting clinical endpoints published between January 1, 2023, and December 31, 2023, were eligible for inclusion in this article. DATA EXTRACTION: Articles from a systematic search and the Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update were included. An a priori defined three-round modified Delphi process was employed to achieve consensus on the most impactful publications based on the following considerations: 1) overall contribution to scientific knowledge and 2) novelty to the literature. DATA SYNTHESIS: The systematic search and Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology Pharmacotherapy Literature Update returned a total of 1202 articles, of which 1164 were excluded. The remaining 38 articles underwent a three-round modified Delphi process. In each round, articles were independently scored based on overall contribution to scientific knowledge and novelty to the literature. Included articles are summarized and their impact discussed. Article topics included hydrocortisone for severe community-acquired pneumonia, inhaled amikacin for prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia, methylene blue for septic shock, restrictive vs. liberal fluid management for sepsis-induced hypotension, andexanet alfa for major bleeding associated with factor Xa inhibitors, and early administration of four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate in patients with trauma at risk for massive transfusion. CONCLUSIONS: This review provides a summary and perspective on the potential impact of the most relevant articles in 2023 describing advances in the pharmacotherapeutic care of critically ill patients.