Back to Authors

Al‐Ogaili, Mustafa

https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3748-4971

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 2

The comparison of radiological gastrostomy tube placement: Balloon and bumper: A retropective cross‐sectional study
Beizavi, Zahra , Al‐Ogaili, Mustafa , Ghozy, Sherief, Alzubaidi, Sadeer , Ghozy, Sherief , Khurana, Aditya

Nutrition in Clinical Practice | February 17, 2025 | Volume: 40 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 733-741

10.1002/ncp.11275 Get It

Abstract Background Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomy (PRG) are used for gastric drainage, decompression, and feeding. Recent innovations enable bumper and balloon‐type tube placement via transabdominal approach under guidance of fluoroscopy or sonography. Method This is a single‐center retrospective cohort study to evaluate the outcomes of balloon and bumper gastrostomy tube placement under guide of fluoroscopy and ultrasound. The total sample size was 470 consecutive patients. The eligibility criteria included all patients aged ≥18 years who underwent a balloon or bumper‐type gastrostomy tube insertion for nutrition support in both the interventional radiology unit and at the bedside between 2017 and 2022. Result This study revealed no significant differences between the two types of tubes in terms of time to tube replacement or requiring a gastrostomy tube. There was a positive correlation between the time that a patient has a gastrostomy tube and major complications ( P = 0.005) and a positive correlation between number of tubes replaced and minor complications ( P < 0.001). Both types of tubes were associated with low rates of complications. However, patients with a balloon tube were more likely to experience gastric‐tube–related hospitalization/ED visits and require a >24‐h hospital stay postoperation. Conclusion These findings can help healthcare providers make informed decisions when selecting the appropriate type of tube for their patients to have more durability with less complication.
Post–Liver Transplantation Vascular and Biliary Anatomy: A Pictorial Review
Al‐Ogaili, Mustafa , Baldawi, Jumana, Wallace, Alex, Alzubaidi, Sadeer , Knuttinen, Grace , Naidu, Sailendra , Patel, Indravadan , Öklü, Rahmi

Digestive Disease Interventions | September 20, 2024 | Volume: 09 | Issue: 02 | Pages: 094-099

10.1055/s-0044-1790523 Get It

AbstractThis article aims to assist radiologists in navigating the vascular and biliary anatomy of post-transplant patients, thereby enhancing their diagnostic accuracy and determining the need for potential interventions. We have detailed established methods for anastomosis between the donor and recipient arterial, hepatic venous, portal venous, and biliary systems, while omitting surgical techniques, vascular shunting, and operative procedures, as our primary audience is radiologists. The focus of this review is on inflow and outflow of both blood and bile. Given the numerous possible anastomosis points in hepatic transplantation, familiarizing radiologists with these variations will support their efforts in identifying crucial structures in post-transplant patients.