Abstract 3276: A novel in vivo xenograft mouse model of human high-grade serous ovarian cancer, with clinical, molecular and functional annotation relevant for pre-clinical analysis
Abstract Background: The five year survival rate for women with ovarian cancer (OC) is less than 40%. Crucial to improving the outcomes for ovarian cancer patients is the development of accurate pre-clinical models of human epithelial OC, which can be used to unravel the mechanisms underlying its evolution and behaviour. Methods: We have generated a novel xenograft model of human high-grade serous OC (HG-SOC) in order to enable preclinical molecular and drug response assessment of individual HG-SOC: this includes a comparison of standard OC xeno-transplantion approaches (intra-peritoneal, subcutaneous and sub renal capsular), with the novel use of the rodent ovarian bursa, the orthotopic site. Utilising the rodent bursa may better replicate the relevant microenvironment and increase the success of EOC xeno-transplantion. Other aspects designed to optimize the model include the use of NOD-SCID-IL-2rg recipient mice, systemic estrogen supplementation and transplantation of fresh human HG-SOC fragments which have had no prior in vitro culture. Histological, functional and molecular analysis of the novel xenograft cohort (at baseline and following xenotransplantation) includes histological review; documentation of in vitro Homologous Recombination (HR) DNA repair and drug response capabilities (using novel α-irradiation and explant drug assays); classification according to molecular subtype (Tothill classfier); documentation of NHEJ pathway status, BRCA1/2 status and other DNA repair gene status. In vivo drug treatment studies are being performed, with the choice of treatment targeted to the specific molecular characteristics of the HG-SOC in question. Results: Fourteen consecutive chemotherapy naive potentially HG-SOC samples have been collected. Corresponding clinical data has been collected. Data concerning DNA repair capability and response to DNA damaging agents will be presented, including IHC for markers of DNA damage (γH2AX), DNA repair (RAD51) and apoptosis (capsase 3 cleavage). HG-SOC in this cohort have been classified according to Tothilll (Tothill et al 2008). Eight appropriate HG-SOC have been transplanted and 5 of the first 6 have successfully xenografted, with phenotyping of xenografts underway. In vivo analysis of response to cisplatin treatment and other relevant therapeutics will be presented. Conclusions: A novel xenograft model has been developed of human HG-SOC, which includes comparative characterization of important prognostic features both in the baseline panel of fresh human HG-SOC and in subsequent xenografts. This clinically, functionally and molecularly annotated consecutive xenograft cohort of HG-SOC will provide outstanding utility for the development of improved therapeutic approaches. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 3276. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-3276
Abstract 4179: Loss of Hsulf-1 promotes chemoresistance and tumorigenecity in ovarian cancer
Abstract Human Sulfatase1 enzyme (HSulf-1) is down-regulated in a majority of ovarian cancer cell lines and primary tumors, but the functional consequence of this downregulation remains unclear. Here, we show that down-regulation of HSulf-1 by RNA interference resulted in an elevated level of phosphorylated Erk and phosphorqylated Akt as well as decreased Bim level in OV202 ovarian cancer cells. Treatment with PD98059 (p-Erk inhibitor) but not LY90024 (PI3K inhibitor) resulted in increased Bim level in Hsulf-1 knockdown cells, suggesting that increased Erk pathway plays a more important role in modulating Bim level after loss of HSulf-1. Consistently, the results of real-time PCR confirmed that there was no significant change in the mRNA level of Bim after knockdown of HSulf-1 expression. When treated with CDDP, OV202 cells with knockdown of HSulf-1 displayed more resistance to drug-induced apoptosis, with IC50 value 3-fold higher than cells with non-targeting shRNA (NTC), while SKOV3 cells with overexpression of HSulf-1 were more sensitive to CDDP-induced apoptosis compared to the control cells. Moreover, HSulf-1 downregulated OV202 cells showed remarkable growth of colonies in soft agar compared to no colony growing with NTC cells. When injected subcutaneously, HSulf-1 ShRNA clones but not NTC cells formed xenogrfts in nude mice. Importantly, rescuing Bim expression in HSulf-1 shRNA cells not only endowed cells sensitivity to CDDP treatment, but also significantly decreased numbers of colony formation in soft agar and significantly retarded tumor growth in nude mice. Collectively, these results strongly suggest that down-regulation of HSulf-1 promotes chemoresistance and tumorigenicity in ovarian cancer cells through post-translational downregulation of Bim level. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4179. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-4179
Effects of Selective Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibition on Cytarabine Cytotoxicity in Acute Myelogenous Leukemia Cells
In Vitro
Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | August 1, 2012 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available
Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | July 31, 2012 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available
Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | July 31, 2012 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available
Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | July 31, 2012 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available
Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature | July 31, 2012 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available
Abstract Background: ABT-888 is an inhibitor of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase1 (PARP1) and PARP2, two highly conserved enzymes implicated in DNA repair, maintenance of genomic stability, and regulation of transcription. Topotecan (TPT) is a water soluble camptothecin derivative with antitumor activity against ovarian tumors. The combination of ABT-888 with TPT is under investigation in phase I trials because PARP inhibition sensitizes tumors cells to TPT in vitro and in vivo. In those trials, the pharmacokinetics of TPT and ABT-888 are being studied to determine if ABT-888 levels are sufficient to modulate PARP activity and to investigate the potential interaction between TPT and ABT-888. Methods: Advanced cancer patients with ECOG performance scores 0-2, adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function were treated with ABT-888 on days 1-3, 8-10, and 15-17 every 28 days. Topotecan was administered on days 2, 9 and 16 every 28 days. DLTs were defined as grade 4 neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 anemia or ≥ grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities despite maximal supportive care. ABT-888 and Toptoecan pharmacokinetics were characterized in all patients. Analysis of urinary recovery is ongoing. Results: In this ongoing Phase I trial, 13 female patients with ovarian (n=12) or breast (n=1) cancer have been enrolled to date and pharmacokinetic data is available for 12 of those patients. ABT-888/TPT dose levels are: Level 1- 10 mg/ 2 mg/m2, Level 2- 20 mg/2 mg/m2, Level 3- 10 mg/3 mg/m2, and Level 4- 20 mg/3 mg/m2. The combination of ABT-888 with topotecan has been tolerable, with no dose limiting toxicity, and dose escalation continues at dose level 5. Topotecan t1/2 and clearance values were 3.0 ± 0.5 hrs and 9.50 ± 1.51 L/hr/m2 when administered alone, and were not affected by administration with ABT-888. When administered alone, ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC0-∞ values after the 10 mg dose were 8.2 ± 2.4 hrs, 432 ± 217 nM, and 2568 ± 1300 nM*hr, respectively. ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC values after the 20 mg dose were 5.7 ± 3.1 hrs, 600 ± 165 nM, and 3870± 934 respectively. When administered with TPT, ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax, AUC values after the 10 mg dose were 7.2 ± 2.1 hrs, 412 ± 283 nM, and 2705± 1089 nM*hr are: nM*hr respectively. ABT-888 t1/2, Cmax and AUC values after the 20 mg dose combined with TPT were 5.8 ± 2.2 hrs, 664 ± 97.6 nM, and 4283± 936 nM*hr respectively. Conclusions: Plasma clearance of TPT and ABT-888 does not appear to be altered when they are administered together. The effect of co-administration of these agents on renal clearance is presently under investigation and those results will be presented. This work was supported by NIH grants R25 GM75148-04, U01CA069912-16S and MM01-RR00585. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1301. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1301
Abstract A47: Somatic mutations in human cancer cell lines predict sorafenib response
Abstract It is now widely accepted that a spectrum of somatic alterations occur in human cancer and that particular alterations are associated with response or lack of response to anti-cancer therapies. Here, we undertook a systematic correlation analysis of somatic mutations, copy number aberrations and drug response across 300+ human cancer cell lines. We studied the RAF and VEGFR inhibitor, sorafenib, evaluating associations between sorafenib response and somatic mutations in 35 common cancer genes and high-level amplifications and homozygous deletions in more than 100 minimal common regions of gain and loss, which include many known oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes. Notably, we found that NRAS mutations, among other alterations, were significantly associated with sensitivity to sorafenib (odds ratio = 7, p-value = 0.003), whereas activating BRAF mutations were strongly associated with a lack of response (odds ratio = 4.9, p-value = 0.012). Specifically, 64% (7 of 11) of NRAS mutant cell lines were sensitive to sorafenib, while only 20% (34 of 170) of NRAS wild-type lines were sensitive. On the contrary, just 6.7% (2 of 30) of BRAF mutant lines were sensitive to sorafenib. Because NRAS mutations occur frequently in leukemia and no leukemia cell lines were included in the original analysis, we selected 5 NRAS mutant and 5 NRAS wild-type leukemia cell lines for further evaluation. Consistent with our previous observation, the four most sensitive leukemia cell lines were all NRAS mutant, each line exhibiting greater than 50% growth inhibition after 72 hours of exposure to 4uM sorafenib. These results confirm the original association and suggest that across both solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, NRAS mutations may identify a subset of cancers that are likely to respond sorafenib. In addition, this work demonstrates that systematic analysis of somatic alterations and drug response across a large collection of cancer cell lines is capable of discovering novel predictive biomarkers. Citation Information: Mol Cancer Ther 2009;8(12 Suppl):A47.