Cerhan, James R.

Background: Anaplastic large cell lymphomas (ALCLs) represent a heterogeneous group of T-cell lymphomas that currently are classified by the presence or absence of ALK tyrosine kinase (TK) fusion genes (ALK+ or ALK−) and clinical presentation (systemic, cutaneous, or breast implant-associated). Two overarching molecular types of ALCL recently were discovered, defined by the presence (Type I) or absence (Type II) of a gene expression signature highly enriched for JAK-STAT3 activation. Fusions involving non-ALK TK genes occur in some ALK− cases, but the fusion landscape of ALCL remains incompletely characterized. Methods: Expert consensus pathology review was conducted in the Lymphoma/Leukemia Molecular Profiling Project (LLMPP). RNAseq was performed and fusions were identified using FusionCatcher. Here, we focused on recurrent in-frame coding fusions. Previously unreported fusions were validated by RT-PCR. Type I/II was assigned using a previously validated gene expression-based model. Genes with adjusted (adj) P<0.05 were considered differentially expressed. Overall survival (OS) was assessed for systemic ALCL, when available. Results: We evaluated 379 ALCLs (229M/150F; mean age, 56 y). Of 199 candidate fusions (excluding reciprocal events), 28 were recurrent and passed quality metrics. At least 1 of these 28 fusions was present in 150 cases (40%). ALK fusions were present in 106 ALK+ ALCLs (all Type I; P<0.0001). Of these, NPM1::ALK was seen in 68/106 (64%). Alternate partners (X::ALK) included ATIC (N=24) and CTLC, COL1A2, MSN, MYH9, RNF213, SATB1, TFH, TPM3, and TRAF1 (1-3 cases each). X::ALK was associated with older age (mean, 52 y) than NPM1::ALK (32 y; P<0.0001) and showed relative overexpression of 49 genes, including multiple activators of small GTPases such as CGNL1 (FC, 5.6; Padj=2.4×10-6), SRGAP1, ALS2, DOCK1, and NCKAP1. ALK expression was similar in cases with NPM1::ALK and X::ALK and there was no significant difference in OS. Non-ALK TK fusions were seen in 17/273 ALK− cases (6%), including TYK2 (N=9); JAK2 (N=6); and ROS1 (N=2). All were Type I ALCLs (P<0.0001). ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions overexpressed 38 genes compared to ALK− cases without TK fusions, including cytokines involved in the IL17 signaling pathway such as CXCL6 (FC, 12.5; Padj=4.2×10-3), CXCL1, and CSF3. We then assessed the relationship between ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions and ALK+ cases by separately comparing each subset to ALK− cases without TK fusions. FC values for ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions were significantly correlated with FC values for ALK+ ALCLs over the set of expressed genes (R=0.54; P<0.0001). At a median follow-up of 32 months, 0/4 systemic ALCL patients with non-ALK TK fusions had died, while 30% of those with ALK− ALCL without TK fusions had died, but this was not statistically significant (P=0.26). The other 13 ALK− cases with non-ALK TK fusions were either localized ALCLs or did not have outcome data available. Of 20 TP63 fusions, 17 (85%) were TBL1XR1::TP63 and 3 were X::TP63. As previously reported, TP63 fusions were associated with poor OS (median OS, 10 months; not reached for other ALK− ALCLs; P=0.007). Four ALCLs had a novel NCL::UBTF fusion involving genes encoding the nucleolar proteins nucleolin and nucleolar (upstream binding) transcription factor-1. Four cases each had PARG::BMS1 and TNK1::GPS2 (the latter seen only in Type I ALCLs). Conclusions: This large consortium-based analysis of coding fusions further elucidates the molecular distinction between Type I and Type II ALCLs. Both ALK and non-ALK TK fusions were seen exclusively in Type I ALCLs, which we have shown previously are enriched for JAK-STAT3 pathway genes and correlate strongly with pSTAT3Y705 positivity by immunohistochemistry. These fusions were not identified in Type II ALCLs, which previous data suggest are associated with epigenetic alterations. ALK+ ALCLs with NPM1::ALK and X::ALK showed differences in gene expression, suggesting biological differences. Furthermore, ALCLs with non-ALK TK fusions shared gene expression features with ALK+ ALCL. Clinical fusion detection could enhance molecular classification of Type I and Type II ALCLs and may guide precision therapy.

Introduction: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients experience favorable outcomes following frontline immunochemotherapy, however, 30-40% of patients will exhibit primary refractory disease or relapse (rrDLBCL). Recent studies have expanded upon well-defined characteristics of newly diagnosed DLBCL (ndDLBCL) to elucidate genomic landscapes underlying rrDLBCL; yet, high-throughput examination of resistance and relapse mechanisms within rrDLBCL subtypes, including the newly defined dark zone signature (DZsig) addition to cell of origin (COO), have yet to be described. To expand upon the current tumor etiology and define subtype-specific driving mechanisms, we describe a multi-omic analysis leveraging clinical and biologic variables in rrDLBCL. Methods: Tumor biopsies (N=228) collected at the time of relapse were obtained from n=85 participants in the Mayo Clinic/University of Iowa Lymphoma Molecular Epidemiology Resource (MER), n=73 in the Mayo Clinic Biobank, and n=38 from CC-122-DLBCL-001 or n=32 CC-122-ST-001 trials. Tumor samples were analyzed by WES (n=158) or WGS (n=70) and by RNAseq (n=145). Comparative analysis against ndDLBCL MER samples (N=444) utilized WES (n=404) and RNAseq (n=321). Chi Square or Fisher's exact test was used for enrichment analysis of categorical variables, while Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for continuous variables. Results: rrDLBCL samples were enriched for ABC (46% vs 33% in ndDLBCL, p=0.01), and fewer GCB (27% vs 40%, p=0.006). Amongst rrDLBCL patients, variance in overall survival (from time of original diagnosis; log-rank p=0.001) was observed between COO subtypes, with poor outcomes in patients with DZsig (median 15.0 mo) and GCB (36.5 mo) compared to ABC tumors (74.4 mo). Patients with progression or relapse within 6 months featured a more even COO distribution (ABC - 22%, GCB - 34%, DZsig - 28%) than patients with early (6-24 mo; 51%, 22%, 22%) or late relapses (>24 mo; 62%, 19%, 4%), which were predominantly ABC. Comparing mutation frequency within subtypes, rrDLBCL GCB tumors were enriched for B2M (41% vs 15% in ndDLBCL, p=0.002), EP300 (19% vs 7%, p=0.059), CIITA (19% vs 5%, p=0.02), PRKCB (11% vs 2%, p=0.035), CD79B (11% vs 0%, p=0.004), and CD83 (8% vs 1%, p=0.049) mutations, and CNV events including gains at 8q24.21 (MYC locus; 48% vs 14%, p<0.001) and 18q21.33 (BCL2, TCF4 locus; 36% vs 15%, p=0.021), and losses at 17p13.1 (TP53 locus; 40% vs 19%, p=0.035). rrDLBCL DZsig tumors featured enrichment for BCL6 (22% vs 3%, p=0.025), and SPEN (17% vs 3%, p=0.062) mutations and 2q22.2 losses (LRP1B locus; 20% vs 0%, p=0.019). Despite differential mutation and CNV profiles, gene expression analysis revealed minimal variance within COO subtypes in rrDLBCL and ndDLBCL, however upregulation of lymphoma driving genes including MYBPC2 (LogFC=1.68, FDR<0.001), MYOM2 (LogFC=1.33, FDR=0.007), MYC (LogFC=0.61, FDR=0.04), and CELSR2 (LogFC=0.53, FDR=0.02) were observed in ABC rrDLBCL. Increased frequency of LymphGen classifier A53 was observed in ABC (43% vs 17%, p=0.005) and GCB (40% vs 14%, p=0.009) rrDLBCL. Using CIBERSORTx to infer lymphoma microenvironment (LME) cell type abundance, an LME-depleted class was evident in rrDLBCL tumors, including reduction of CD8+ T cells (effect size (r)=-0.78, p<0.001) and T follicular helper cells (r=-0.48, p=0.012) in GCB rrDLBCL and reduction of T follicular helper cells (r=-0.43, p=0.023) and Tregs (r=-0.32, p=0.065) in DZsig rrDLBCL. Significance: We present an update to the genomic landscape of rrDLBCL, highlighting GCB and DZsig tumors with differential biology and advanced clinical course. Our data supports increased implementation of sequencing efforts in rrDLBCL to more broadly evaluate relapse mechanisms, with optimism that a more detailed understanding of r/r disease may guide trials for targeted treatment strategies. For example, rrDLBCL patients may be strong candidates for MYC pathway targeting agents (BETi), or a Lenalidomide-based regimen (R2 or Tafa-Len), as Lenalidomide has been shown to reprogram the LME via PD-L1 expression in addition to downregulation of MYC and MYC target genes. Or, due to enrichment of variants affecting anti-apoptotic proteins including BCL6 or BCL2 in DZsig and GCB rrDLBCL, a venetoclax-based therapeutic may be considered. Further targeted strategies should be considered as development of a more personalized approach remains an unmet need.

Background: Monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL) is a common premalignant condition that can be classified into chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)-type (CD5, CD23, and CD20 co-expression), and non-CLL-type (CD5-negative) based on flow cytometry immunophenotypes. CLL-type MBL is relatively well characterized with increased risk of hematologic (especially lymphoid) malignancies, serious infections, and decreased response to vaccinations. However, the prevalence, genetic predispositions, and clinical consequences of non-CLL-type MBL remain to be fully elucidated. Herein, we report findings in non-CLL-type MBL in a large screening cohort. Methods: We screened 10,330 individuals (40 years or older with no prior history of hematologic cancers) for MBL with highly sensitive flow cytometry, in the Mayo Clinic Biobank, with patients recruited from primary care-based clinics. Individuals were genotyped by Regeneron Genetics. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among those individuals residing in the 27 counties surrounding Rochester, Minnesota, we identified incident hematologic malignancies and melanomas using ICD codes and the Rochester Epidemiology Project, a population based medical records linkage system. All diagnoses were manually reviewed for confirmation. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CIs, adjusted for age and sex. Results: We identified 1,736 individuals with MBL and 8,341 individuals without MBL. Among those with MBL, 246 (14.2%) had non-CLL-type MBL as the major clone. The median age of non-CLL-type MBL was 77 years (range, 47-95). The prevalence of non-CLL-type MBL significantly increased with age, with 0.5% prevalence among those between 40 to 59 years of age, 2.3% prevalence among those between 60 and 79 years, and 7.8% prevalence in those 80 years of age or older. The prevalence of non-CLL-type MBL was significantly higher (P < .001) among males (3.1%) than females (2.0%). Using the genome-wide complex trait analysis tool, the heritability of non-CLL-type MBL was estimated to be ~26%, suggesting inherited genetics plays a role in etiology. To identify common inherited variants, we first evaluated the known CLL susceptibility variants, many of which also associated with CLL-type MBL. Among the 42 variants, none were statistically associated (all P > .05) with non-CLL-type MBL. We next conducted a genome-wide association study to identify novel variants, and the most significant variant resided in 10q26.3 (minor allele frequency [MAF]control = 0.7%, MAFMBL = 3.5%, OR = 6.4, 95% CI 3.6-11.3, P = 5.7 * 10-8). Among the 6,478 individuals (192 with non-CLL-type MBL and 6,286 without MBL) followed for incident hematologic malignancies, 36 developed lymphoid and 23 developed myeloid malignancies after a median of 4.2 years of follow up. Similar to CLL-type MBL, non-CLL-type MBL was associated with a 5.2-fold risk for lymphoid malignancies (95% CI 2.0-13.0, P < .001). Elevated but not significant risks were observed for myeloid malignancies (HR = 2.3, 95% CI 0.5-10.3, P = 0.27). The lymphoid malignancies developed by individuals with non-CLL-type MBL included diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, multiple myeloma, marginal zone lymphoma, and other low-grade lymphomas. We recently reported that individuals with CLL-type MBL are at higher risk for developing melanoma (HR = 1.9, 95% CI 1.3-2.8). Interestingly, non-CLL-type MBL had no evidence of an association with melanoma risk (HR = 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.8). We did not observe a significant difference in overall survival between individuals with non-CLL-type MBL vs those without MBL. Conclusions: In the largest screening cohort to date, we evaluated the etiology and clinical outcomes of non-CLL-type MBL, an understudied yet common condition that occurs in ~4 million adults in the United States. Non-CLL-type MBL is more common in men and older individuals, and evidence supports that inherited genetics plays an etiological role with 10q26.3 locus identified as a novel susceptibility locus. Individuals with non-CLL-type MBL had significantly increased risk of lymphoid malignancies, similar to CLL-type MBL, but, distinct from CLL-type MBL, no evidence of an increased risk of melanoma. Our study provides insights into the prevalence, genetic predispositions and clinical consequences of non-CLL-type MBL and how it differs from the classic CLL-type MBL.

Background: Although advanced stage cHL typically has excellent disease outcomes, 20-30% of patients (pts) experience treatment failure. In addition, decision-making is challenging given varying treatment options and incomplete prognostic data across the disease course. Pre-treatment factors, such as those incorporated into the Advanced Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma International Prognostication Index (A-HIPI), predict 5 year (y) overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (Rodday JCO 2023). Other than interim PET (iPET) results, it is unknown what factors influence cHL disease states mid-therapy. Using multistate modeling (MSM) and individual pt data from the HoLISTIC Consortium, we refined prognostication across the cHL disease course, specifically assessing the relationships between A-HIPI, iPET and end of treatment (EOT) response, and whether the A-HIPI and iPET provide independent prognostic information. Methods: We analyzed 1240 pts aged 18-65y with newly diagnosed Stage IIB, III or IV cHL treated on 2 advanced stage PET-adapted trials (RATHL, SWOG0816). All pts first received 2 cycles of ABVD; those with a negative iPET (Deauville score (DS) ≤3) received ABVD or AVD, and those with a positive iPET (DS >3) received BEACOPP. In contrast to other methods, MSMs incorporate multiple disease states into one model, account for censoring and competing risks, and estimate transitions between disease states using different covariates. Our MSM had 6 states: diagnosis, negative iPET, positive iPET, EOT non-progression (e.g., DS ≤ 3), treatment failure, and death. Treatment failure included progression or relapse. All pts start at the diagnosis state and can transition to other states without return to prior states. Transition states with <5 events were excluded. The MSM was estimated using a multivariable Cox model with censoring at 5y. Covariates were the 5y PFS A-HIPI (comprised of stage and continuous age, lymphocyte count and albumin), which was included for all transitions, and iPET, which was included for transitions from EOT non-progression and from treatment failure. Higher scores on the 5y PFS A-HIPI indicate lower risk of progression or death; the A-HIPI was modeled for a 1 standard deviation (SD) increase. We calculated probabilities of 5y treatment failure for 4 sample pts based on low (70) and high (85) A-HIPI scores, positive and negative iPET, and EOT non-progression. Results: Median age was 33y (Q1=25, Q3=45), 56% were male, 23% were stage IIB, 40% III and 37% IV, and mean A-HIPI was 77 (SD=7). Median follow-up was 75 months (Q1=53, Q3=92). At iPET, 80% (95% CI 78%, 83%) were negative and 16% (95% CI 14%, 18%) were positive. At EOT, 90% (95% CI 89%, 92%) were in the non-progression state. At 5y, 75% (95% CI 73%, 78%) were in the non-progression state, 16% (95% CI 14%, 19%) had experienced treatment failure, and 9% (7%, 11%) had died. Better A-HIPI scores (per SD) were associated with lower rates of transitioning from diagnosis to positive iPET (HR=0.80, p<0.01) and from positive iPET to treatment failure (HR=0.58, p=0.04). Better A-HIPI scores (per SD) were also associated with lower rates of transitioning from EOT non-progression to treatment failure (HR=0.78, p<0.01) and from treatment failure to death (HR=0.64, p<0.01), adjusting for iPET. Positive iPET was associated with an increased rate of transitioning from EOT non-progression to treatment failure (HR=1.90, p<0.01), adjusting for A-HIPI. The probability of 5y treatment failure for 4 sample pts was: 25% for low A-HIPI and positive iPET; 20% for high A-HIPI and positive iPET; 13% for low A-HIPI and negative iPET; and 12% for high A-HIPI and negative iPET. Conclusions: We created a novel MSM that refines prognostication across the cHL disease course by incorporating pre- and post-treatment factors (e.g., iPET) to estimate transitions to future disease states. Although the A-HIPI was developed using pre-treatment factors to predict 5y OS and PFS, we found that it was also associated with transitions to interim disease states, including iPET and EOT response. The A-HIPI and iPET each provided independent prognostic information, supporting the use of both in estimating cHL outcomes. Future analyses will develop clinical prediction models using MSMs that also incorporate varying frontline and salvage treatments and treatment-specific late effects, with the goal of providing individualized information across the disease course.

Background: Immune dysfunction is a hallmark of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), and several studies suggest that hypogammaglobulinemia at the time of CLL diagnosis may predict shorter time to first therapy (TTFT; Parikh et al, 2015). However, it is unclear if hypogammaglobulinemia can predict TTFT independent of the CLL-International Prognostic Index (CLL-IPI) and the tumor mutational load (TML). We sought to determine if serum immunoglobulin (Ig) levels at diagnosis can independently predict outcomes in patients with CLL and its precursor, high-count monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis (MBL). Methods: We used the Mayo Clinic CLL Database to identify newly diagnosed CLL/MBL consented within 2 years of diagnosis. Next generation sequencing (NGS) was performed using a 59 gene panel (SureSelect) to detect mutated CLL genes. Serum Ig levels were quantitated by radial immunodiffusion (Immunoplates). Serum Ig levels below the lower limit of normal were defined as hypogammaglobulinemia. We used Chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests to compare discrete variables and the Kruskal Wallis test for continuous variables. TTFT was calculated from date of diagnosis to date of first treatment or date last known to be untreated. We used Cox regression models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for TTFT and overall survival (OS) associations. Results: We identified 895 newly diagnosed patients (588 CLL and 307 MBL) who had undergone NGS for recurrent somatic mutations and had serum Ig levels available at the time of diagnosis. The median absolute B-cell count was 6.7 x109/L; 613 (69%) were male, 375 (42%) had unmutated IGHV genes, and 81 (9%) had TP53 disruption. Based on CLL-IPI, 412 (46%) patients had low risk, 285 (32%) had intermediate risk, and 198 (22%) had high/very high risk. The most commonly mutated genes were NOTCH1 (14%), SF3B1 (11%), TP53 (10%), NFKBIE (8%), ATM (6%), and BIRC3 (6%). Based on the number of genes with high impact or hotspot mutations, we classified 40%, 29%, and 31% patients with TML scores of 0, 1, or 2+, respectively. At CLL/MBL diagnosis, the median serum IgG, IgA, and IgM was 891 mg/dL (111-2620), 121 mg/dL (1-1150), and 44 mg/dL (5-1320), respectively; 284 (32%) patients had low serum IgG, 128 (17%) had low serum IgA, and 322 (42%) had low serum IgM. Low serum IgA was associated with mutations in NOTCH1, SF3B1, ATM, BIRC3 and NFKBIE, low IgM was associated with SF3B1 and BIRC3 mutations (all comparisons, P < .05), and low IgG was associated with BIRC3 mutation (P = .05). The median follow-up for the cohort was 8.4 years. A total of 359 patients progressed requiring therapy (299 CLL and 60 MBL), and 265 patients died (177 CLL and 88 MBL). The TTFT was significantly shorter for patients with low serum IgG compared to normal serum IgG at diagnosis (median 4.4 vs 10.8 years) and similar findings were observed in individuals with low serum IgA (1.7 vs 10.8 years) and those with low serum IgM (4.6 vs 11.1 years). On univariable analysis, the following were associated with a shorter TTFT: low serum IgG (HR: 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2), low serum IgA (HR: 3.5, 95% CI 2.7-4.4), low serum IgM (HR: 1.9, 95% CI 1.5-2.3), TML score of 1 (HR: 1.7, 95% CI 1.3-2.2), TML of 2+ (HR: 4.4, 95% CI 3.4-5.7), CLL-IPI intermediate risk (HR: 3.7, 95% CI 2.8-4.8), and CLL-IPI high/very high risk (HR: 7.6, 95% CI 5.8-10.1) (all comparisons, P < .0001). In multivariable analyses after adjusting for CLL-IPI and TML, low serum levels of IgG (HR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.5-2.3), IgA (HR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.8-3.0), and IgM (HR: 1.8, 95% CI: 1.5-2.3) were independently associated with a shorter TTFT (all comparisons, P < .0001). No significant differences in OS were detected between patients with low and normal serum IgG, IgM, and IgA on univariate analysis. Similar results for TTFT and OS were observed after adding clonal B-cell count to the Cox model. Conclusions: Our study shows that low serum Ig levels at the time of initial diagnosis is predictive of TTFT independently of the CLL-IPI and TML, which can further risk stratify individuals with newly diagnosed CLL/MBL. Additionally, low serum IgA, IgM, and IgG levels at diagnosis are significantly associated with specific somatic mutations in individuals with newly diagnosed CLL/MBL.

Background: Approximately20% of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) will experience disease progression or death within two years of years (POD24) of immunochemotherapy (IC) (Casulo et al, JCO 2015). A proportion of patients with POD24 have histologic transformation (HT), which heightens the risk of lymphoma-related death (Freeman et al, Blood 2019). To clarify the impact of HT on prognosis in POD24, we analyzed data from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Consortium of Real-World Evidence (CReWE) to compare differences in outcomes among patients with POD24 with retained FL histology versus POD24 with HT. Methods: This was a multicenter study among 8 academic cancer centers. Eligible patients hadgrade 1-3a FL at diagnosis between 2003 and 2022, with POD24 following first line IC treatment with BR, R-CHOP, or R-CVP. POD24 was defined as disease recurrence within 24 months of IC. Patients with prior lines of treatment for FL were excluded. Patients with HT at first line IC were excluded. Biopsy at POD24 was obtained at the discretion of the treating physician. Three groups of POD24 were defined: POD24 with biopsy-proven retained FL histology (POD24_FL), POD24 with biopsy-proven HT to aggressive lymphoma (POD24_HT), and POD24 either without a biopsy or indeterminate histology on biopsy (POD24_I). We evaluated second-line treatments at time of POD24. Survival probabilities from second-line treatment initiation were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results A total of1,122 patients with FL were screened and308 patients with POD24 were identified.Median age at POD24 was 58 years (IQR 50-65).Among available data, race and ethnicity was reported as 76% non-Hispanic White, 3% non-Hispanic Black/African American, 9% Hispanic/Latino (any race), and 1% other minorities. First line therapy was R-CHOP in45% (140/308), BR in 33% (102/308) and R-CVP in 21% (66/308). Most patients (52%) had biopsy-proven retained FL at POD24 (162/308); 30% had no biopsy or indeterminate histology at POD24 (94/308), and 17% had biopsy-proven HT at POD24 (52/308). In the POD24_HT group, 52% received R-CHOP and 21% received intensive salvage chemotherapy as second line therapy. Patients with POD24_FL and POD24_I had similar rates of salvage chemotherapy (21% and 18%), BR (13% and 18%), R-CHOP (19% and 24%), and targeted therapies (8% and 5%), respectively, at second line. Consolidative autologous stem cell transplant was more common in POD24_HT patients at 21% versus 16% in POD24_FL and 6% in POD24_I. Patients with POD24_HT had significantly worse overall survival (OS) compared to POD24_FL (ref), with a hazard ratio of 3.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.46-5.84), even after adjusting for age, FLIPI score, and first-line IC treatment. At 5 years, patients with POD24_HT had OS of 31% compared with an OS of 71% for patients with POD24_FL. Patients with POD24_I had similar outcomes to those with POD24_FL (5-year OS 75% versus 71%, respectively). Event-free survival (EFS) was also significantly lower in POD24_HT compared to POD24_FL: At 2 years, EFS was 27% for POD24_FL (21-35%) and 10% for POD24 _HT (4-23%). At 5 years, lymphoma remained the leading cause of death among patients with POD24, with 20% probability of lymphoma-related death in those with POD24_FL (95% CI 14.2-27.8) compared to 53% probability of lymphoma-related death in patients with POD24_HT (95% CI 40.6-70.7). Conclusions: In our multicenter cohort, we identified remarkable differences between the two biopsy-demonstrated entities of POD24 (i.e., with and without HT). Patients without a biopsy or indeterminate histology had similar outcomes as those with POD24_FL. Patients withearlyrelapse of FL after first-line IC remain a heterogeneous group with poor outcomes and a heightened risk of lymphoma-related mortality particularly compared with nonPOD24 groups. Even with retained FL histology, patients with POD24 had 20% probability of lymphoma-related death within 5 years of second-line treatment initiation. We demonstrate that poor survival is driven in part, but not entirely, by HT. Despite most patients receiving appropriate aggressive treatment, those with POD24_HT represent a distinctly vulnerable population warranting further study in directed prospective studies of both FL biology and clinical trials.

Background: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is one of the most common leukemias in the United States (US), with an estimated incidence of 20,700 cases in 2024. Population-based studies conducted in Olmsted County (OC), Minnesota, reported an increase in CLL incidence over a 55-year period (1935 through 1989), which was attributed to increased detection of early-stage cases in individuals over age 50. In an updated study from 2000 to 2010 in OC, we reported no further increase in the incidence of CLL using the 2008 International Workshop on CLL (IWCLL 2008) guidelines. Additionally, when we compared the 1996 National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCI-WG 96) criteria with the IWCLL 2008 guidelines incorporating the monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis designation, we found that the use of the IWCLL 2008 guidelines reduced the overt CLL incidence, modified the distribution of Rai Stages at diagnosis, and shortened the median time to first treatment (TTFT). Over the last two decades, 5-year survival for CLL has increased due to new therapies and improved supportive care. Herein we provide updated data on the incidence, prevalence, and natural progression of CLL in OC and studied similar features in an expanded 6-county region around Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Methods: We utilized the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP), a population-based medical records linkage system, to identify CLL cases from 2000 to 2020 using International Classification of Diseases codes. We included individuals residing in OC and the expanded 7-county region (REP-7, including OC), for which data became available starting in 2010. CLL cases were included if they met the IWCLL 2008 criteria. All CLL diagnoses were confirmed by manual review of medical records and data on CLL-related factors were collected, including treatment status, prior history of other cancers, and overall survival (OS). Age- and sex-specific incidence rates were derived from REP census data and adjusted to the 2020 US white population. OS analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method. TTFT was calculated with death as a competing risk. Cox regression was used to evaluate the effect of decade on TTFT and OS among patients in OC. Results: From 2010-2020, 242 patients were diagnosed with CLL in REP-7, and between 2000-2020, 174 patients were diagnosed in OC. Among the 242 CLL patients in REP-7, the median age at diagnosis was 71 years (range 30-96),158 (65%) were male, 236 (99%) were white, and 74 (31%) had a history of other cancer, with non-melanoma skin cancer being the most common. After age and sex adjustment to the 2020 US white population, the CLL incidence in REP-7 and OC from 2010 to 2020 was 7.8 and 8.1 per 100,000 individuals, respectively. In OC, the age- and sex-adjusted CLL incidence from 2000 to 2020 was 7.5 per 100,000 individuals, showing no significant trend changes over time. Among the 242 patients diagnosed with CLL in REP-7 between 2010 and 2020, 102 received treatment with a median TTFT of 9.8 years. In OC from 2000 to 2020, 79 out of 174 patients received treatment with a median TTFT of 9.4 years. When comparing across two decades in OC, the median TTFT was 12.8 years for the period from 2000 to 2009, decreasing to 5.9 years between 2010 and 2020, but was not significantly different after accounting for age and sex. The median OS for patients diagnosed with CLL in REP-7 from 2010 to 2020 was 11 years. The median OS for patients in OC between 2000 to 2020 was 12.6 years. When comparing across decades in OC, the median OS was 8.9 years for the period from 2000 to 2009, increasing to 13.6 years for those diagnosed between 2010 and 2020, but this trend was not significantly different after accounting for age and sex. Prevalence data for REP-7 and OC were analyzed as of 01/01/2020. Additionally, prevalence data for OC were available for 01/01/2010. In REP-7, the prevalence of CLL was 97 per 100,000 individuals on 01/01/2020. In OC, the CLL prevalence was 86 per 100,000 individuals on 01/01/2010, and 100 per 100,000 individuals on 01/01/2020. Conclusions: We observed no substantial increase in the incidence rates of CLL in REP-7 from 2010 to 2020, nor in the 20 years of available data from OC. However, the prevalence of CLL in OC increased by 16% from 2010 to 2020. Additionally, evidence indicated a longer OS among newly diagnosed CLL cases in OC compared to previous decades, suggesting a potential impact of improved therapeutic approaches on OS.

Background: Due to recent advances, patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) have multiple treatment options with high response rates and durability. However, there is a gap in understanding how patient preferences influence treatment selection. To close this gap, we conducted a qualitative study using focus groups of adults with FL to understand their knowledge of treatment options, priorities, and decision-making process. We designed this study to inform the content of a planned discrete choice experiment in a larger population of patients with FL to better understand patient preferences and trade-offs around treatment delivery, side effects, outcomes, and quality of life. Methods: We conducted focus groups lasting 60-90 minutes, each with 3-5 participants recruited from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes (LEO) Cohort Study. The LEO Cohort Study is a multi-institutional prospective cohort study of newly diagnosed adults with non-Hodgkin lymphoma from July 2015 to present. Each focus group was co-led by two investigators (U.D. and M.T.) and conducted using Zoom video technology. Participants were asked to comment on their understanding about FL and available treatments, their ideal treatment, their decision-making process about prior therapies, and quality of life and side effects associated with treatment. We performed exploratory content analysis of participant understanding of FL and their treatment preferences. We will continue to conduct focus groups until we reach thematic saturation, which we anticipate will occur with one additional focus group. Themes from all focus groups were identified and agreed upon by both investigators (U.D. and M.T.) and were verified by additional investigators (J.D., M.L, M.H., B.K.L, C.C., M.M.). Results: To date, we conducted five focus groups with a total of N=21 participants (median age 60 [range 41-88], 66.7% female, 71.4% non-Hispanic White, 14.3% Hispanic, 9.5% Asian, 4.8% Black/Hispanic). We identified the following themes and representative quotes: 1) Holistic approach:Participants wanted their oncologists to view their care from a holistic perspective, discussing their individual priorities and options that would accommodate their fitness routine and ability to work. “[I wish] if doctors can consider not just the physical choices, but also the mental and emotional choices as well, the holistic person.” - Participant 13 “There's zero chance I can go back to working in the type of career where other people rely on me for things. I can't keep things straight.” - Participant 16 2) Ideal treatment:An ideal treatment would limit impact on fatigue, cognitive function, and have minimal toxicity to preserve quality of life and an active lifestyle. “I would say something that has minimal impact on daily life would be ideal and something that would make you feel better.” - Participant 6 3) Shared decision-making: Participants wanted to be better informed about available treatment options and often utilized second opinions to inform their decisions. “It helped to get the second opinion versus not. It would've been a completely different set of events.” - Participant 17 4) Treatment burden:Financial impact and effort required by patients to receive care (e.g., travel, number of office visits, and duration of therapy) were key factors in patient decision-making. “Part of my quality of life went down because I had to fight with my insurance company consistently, and we pay a lot of money.” - Participant 11 “Really explain the time options and calendarize the treatment and be more specific about the amount of time that you're going to spend at the hospital and the process.” - Participant 20 5) Representation: Minority participants raised concerns about not knowing if the available treatment data pertained to them. “[My end-goal would be] having an understanding of how the treatment is going to be for minority people. Many times the treatments are tested, they are not tested for minorities.” - Participant 21 Conclusions: The patient perspective is critical for treatment decision-making and education. People living with FL expressed a desire for a holistic and individualized approach to treatment decision-making that incorporated their lifestyle, minimized side effects, and limited overall treatment burden. These focus groups identified emerging themes that warrant further investigation for survivors with FL.

ABSTRACTDiffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients that fail to achieve a complete metabolic response with frontline immunochemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Genomic profiling has led to a broader understanding of the molecular drivers in DLBCL, but it is unknown how well current classifiers identify patients that will experience primary treatment resistance (PTR). Using whole exome and RNA sequencing data from newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, we evaluated the genomic landscape of PTR and compared it to that of non‐PTR DLBCL. We found a significant increase in the frequency of TP53 (34% vs. 15%, p = 0.005) and ARID1A mutations (21% vs. 7%, p = 0.007) in PTR cases, with pathway analysis further demonstrating a downregulation of TP53 and an increase in chromatin modifying pathways. These results suggest that TP53 and ARID1A may be key mediators of PTR and important pathways contributing to the poor outcomes. We found that the current molecular classifiers were unable to identify PTR cases at diagnosis. However, our newly identified high‐risk signature identified 46% of PTR cases at diagnosis. Overall, these results contribute to our understanding of the genomic landscape of patients with primary treatment resistance.

Abstract Progression of disease within 24 months of initial immunochemotherapy (POD24) is a negative prognostic factor for patients with follicular lymphoma (FL). There is no standard treatment after POD24. Assembling an academic-based cohort from the Lymphoma Epidemiology of Outcomes Consortium for Real World Evidence, we evaluated patterns of care and outcomes for 220 patients with FL with POD24 and retained FL histology. Therapy after POD24 was heterogeneous, with no treatment category accounting for >25% of the total. Among patients initially treated with bendamustine-rituximab, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) was the predominant second-line choice (48%). Among patients initially treated with R-CHOP, aggressive salvage therapy was the predominant second-line choice (38%). Overall response rate to therapy after POD24 was 64% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56-70); complete response rate was 39% (95% CI, 32-46). The median event-free survival for therapy after POD24 was 9.8 months (95% CI, 7.3-12.1); 5-year overall survival (OS) was 71% (95% CI, 65-78). OS was inferior for patients aged >70 years (hazard ratio [HR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.27-4.20) and those with high-risk FL International Prognostic Index scores at diagnosis (HR, 2.10; 95% CI, 1.23-3.60). No treatment category stood out with more favorable results. Cause of death was predominantly lymphoma related. Patients with follicular histology at their POD24 event had a low cumulative incidence of transformation (1.1% at 5 years). Our study is among the largest cohorts describing contemporary patterns of care for patients with POD24, providing a focused data set useful for interpreting and designing prospective clinical trials in this population.