Porr, Corina

Background/Objectives: Leptin is a pleiotropic adipokine linking energy metabolism with innate and adaptive immunity. Its relationship with clinical severity across distinct airway disease phenotypes remains insufficiently characterized. This study examined serum leptin concentrations in adults with allergic rhinitis, non-allergic asthma, and allergic asthma associated with allergic rhinitis. Methods: This single-center retrospective observational study analyzed fully anonymized clinical and laboratory data from 88 adults: patients with allergic rhinitis (n = 31), non-allergic asthma (n = 15), or allergic asthma with allergic rhinitis (n = 22) and healthy controls (n = 20). Serum leptin was measured using a quantitative sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Disease severity was classified using the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma and Global Initiative for Asthma frameworks applicable during the study period. Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics, version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), and available original statistical outputs were summarized using retained t statistics and two-sided p values. Results: Stage-specific mean serum leptin concentrations were heterogeneous and non-monotonic. Statistically significant relationships between leptin concentration and disease stage were reported for allergic rhinitis (t = 2.844; p = 0.008), non-allergic asthma (t = 4.240; p = 0.001), and allergic asthma with allergic rhinitis (t = 2.700; p = 0.013). In the allergic rhinitis subgroup, 64.5% of participants had normal weight, 32.3% were overweight, and 3.2% had grade II obesity; weight category was not significantly related to rhinitis stage. Conclusions: The retained analyses indicate statistically significant relationships between serum leptin concentration and clinical disease stage across the investigated airway phenotypes. However, the stage-specific descriptive means were heterogeneous and non-monotonic and therefore do not support a uniform progressive increase in leptin with increasing disease severity. Because complete model outputs and covariate-adjusted estimates were unavailable, these findings should be regarded as exploratory and require prospective validation with appropriate adjustment for adiposity and other relevant metabolic confounders.

IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD) is a relatively recently described condition whose etiology and pathophysiology remain unclear. Histopathological features include dense lymphoplasmacytic tissue infiltration with numerous IgG4-positive plasma cells, storiform fibrosis, and obliterative phlebitis. Most individuals with IgG4-RD are asymptomatic; however, the disease can affect nearly any organ, leading to a wide range of clinical presentations. The four most common patterns are hepatopancreatobiliary disease, systemic disease, head and neck disease, and retroperitoneal disease. Diagnosis is challenging due to diverse organ involvement and is most often confirmed by biopsy. Elevated serum IgG4 concentration can support the diagnosis, though high IgG4 levels are neither highly sensitive nor specific for IgG4-RD. Immunohistochemical IgG4 staining is crucial, especially in patients without elevated serum IgG4. Differential diagnosis is necessary, as IgG4+ plasma cell infiltration is also seen in inflammatory and malignant conditions. First-line treatment consists of glucocorticoids (prednisone), although favorable outcomes have also been achieved with rituximab. Prognosis varies: the disease may resolve spontaneously or follow a relapsing–remitting course. If left untreated or undertreated, IgG4-RD can cause irreversible organ damage and even death. Finally, correlations have been made between IgG4 and different allergic reactions.

Background: Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a non-immediate, CD8+ T cell–mediated hypersensitivity reaction characterized by well-demarcated erythematous–violaceous plaques that recur at the same site after re-exposure to the causative drug. Although NSAIDs and antibiotics are the most common triggers, various other medications may induce FDE, and genetic susceptibility has been linked to specific HLA alleles. Methods: We conducted a clinical evaluation supported by patch testing, oral drug provocation, and assessment of therapeutic alternatives to identify the causative agent and confirm delayed-type hypersensitivity. Results: We report the case of a 53-year-old woman with essential hypertension, autoimmune thyroiditis, and renal lithiasis who developed well-demarcated erythematous plaques with central vesiculation and moderate pruritus on the dorsal hand and posterior calf approximately 8 h after ingestion of a 60 mg etoricoxib tablet. Patch testing was negative, while oral challenge confirmed etoricoxib-induced FDE; celecoxib was subsequently evaluated as a potential safe alternative. Conclusions: This case underscores the importance of an integrated diagnostic approach—including careful history, clinical examination, and confirmatory testing—to accurately diagnose delayed cutaneous drug reactions and to identify safe therapeutic options for patients.

Background: Urticaria is a common disease with a marked influence on quality of life. The key cell involved is the mast cell, which can be activated by a vast variety of stimuli, and the major mediator is histamine. Allergic urticaria is a disorder with a large variety of causes: food, drugs, insect venom, skin contact with allergens, and physical exercise. Buckwheat consumption has increased in European countries and the USA because it is gluten-free. It can trigger anaphylactic shock if ingested, inhaled, or handled with the hands. Five common buckwheat allergens named Fag e1 to 5 (Fag e1, 2, and 3 are considered the major allergens) and two tartary buckwheat allergens named Fag t1 and Fag t2 have been described. Method: We present the case of a patient who experienced two anaphylactic shocks and in whom the etiological factor was buckwheat. The patient presented to the Allergology department for the evaluation of two episodes of severe allergic reactions that required emergency therapy, episodes that involved the loss of consciousness and were of major severity. At each anaphylactic shock, an ambulance was requested, and emergency therapy was administered, leading to the patient’s recovery within a few hours. Diagnosis: Since each episode occurred a few minutes after eating, the diagnosis was established based on a detailed anamnesis and prick skin tests, followed by specific IgE dosages. Other foods consumed by the patient, assessed by prick skin testing and specific IgE dosages of suspected foods, were excluded as the etiological cause. Increased levels of buckwheat-specific immunoglobulin E were highlighted, thus identifying the etiological agent. The treatment of anaphylactic shock was performed urgently by the ambulance crew with adrenaline, infusion solutions, cortisone preparations, and antihistamines. Result: Following the treatment that was initiated, there was a partial remission of the lesions after a few hours. Conclusions: Buckwheat allergy is rare, but it produces symptoms that affect the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and respiratory tract, as well as anaphylaxis. In a professional environment, it can trigger allergic rhinitis, asthma, and hives. Although buckwheat allergens have been described, their clinical relevance has only been studied in a small number cases. In current practice, the only commercially available allergen is Beech e2 per the ImmunoCAP ISAC microarray. Diagnosis can be difficult in clinical practice. This reported case suggests the need for a thorough anamnesis, since buckwheat is consumed as a hidden allergen, and in Europe, it is not necessary to label foods containing this allergen.