Abstract 2578: Acceleration and Deceleration Slope of Longitudinal Early Mitral Annulus Velocity Distinguishes Primary from Secondary Constrictive Pericarditis
Background: Assessment of coexisting pericardial and myocardial disease in constrictive pericarditis (CP) remains a diagnostic challenge and decision for pericardiectomy depends on the degree of pericardial versus myocardial restraint limiting left ventricular (LV) filling. Early diastolic longitudinal mitral annulus velocity (Ea) can help to differentiate CP from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Recently, acceleration rate of Ea has been shown to be an index of LV myocardial relaxation. We therefore assessed acceleration (Ea-AR) and deceleration (Ea-DR) rate of Ea in patients with CP before and after pericardiectomy. Methods: We retrospectively studied patients (n=42) with surgically confirmed CP who underwent radical pericardiectomy between 2003–2006 at Mayo Clinic Rochester. Ea-AR and Ea-DR slopes were measured before (pre-Echo) and after (post-Echo) pericardiectomy. Patients were divided into primary CP (idiopathic & acute pericarditis with presumed normal myocardial function) and secondary CP (cardiac surgery & chest irradiation with presumed abnormal myocardial function). Results: Ea-AR and Ea-DR changed significantly after pericardiectomy in primary CP patients, however remained similar in secondary CP patients. Diagnostic accuracy of Ea-AR, Ea-DR and Ea to discriminate primary versus secondary CP by ROC analysis was 0.88, 0.80 and 0.81 respectively. Conclusion: Assessment of Ea-AR and Ea-DR in patients with CP is useful to discriminate primary from secondary CP and may help to predict coexistence of myocardial disease: Prepericardiectomy Ea-AR and Ea-DR appear to reflect the interaction of intrinsic myocardial relaxation with enhanced early LV filling. The lack of decrease of Ea-AR and Ea-DR in patients with secondary CP seems to indicate a primarily restrictive component. The significant decrease of Ea-DR in patients with primary CP after pericardiectomy could reflect abolition of a predominant pericardial limitation to LV filling. Early Diastolic Longitudinal Mitral Annulus Motion before and after Pericardiectomy
Mitral and Tricuspid Annular Velocities Before and After Pericardiectomy in Patients With Constrictive Pericarditis
Background— Previous studies have demonstrated that mitral annulus early diastolic (e′) velocity is increased in constrictive pericarditis (CP) and reduced in restrictive cardiomyopathy. However, those studies did not comprehensively evaluate mitral and tricuspid annular velocities before and after pericardiectomy. Methods and Results— We performed comprehensive echocardiography before and after pericardiectomy in 99 patients with CP, 52 with primary (idiopathic or postpericarditis etiology) and 47 with secondary CP (due to surgery or radiation). Overall, mean±SD mitral medial, mitral lateral, and tricuspid lateral e′ velocities were 12.2±4.2, 10.0±5.4, and 11.6±3.5 cm/s, respectively; annular late diastolic velocities were 10.3±4.3, 12.2±4.9, and 11.7±5.4 cm/s, respectively; and annular systolic (s′) velocities were 7.8±2.8, 8.2±2.1, and 11.2±3.8 cm/s, respectively. Medial e′ was equal to or greater than mitral lateral e′ in 74% of analyzable cases. With the exception of tricuspid s′, there were significant differences in all s′ and e′velocities between primary and secondary CP before pericardiectomy. After pericardiectomy, all annular velocities decreased significantly ( P <0.02 for all comparisons). The reduction in medial e′ velocity was greater than that of mitral lateral e′ velocity ( P <0.0001 and P =0.0004, respectively), and the mitral lateral/medial e′ ratio normalized ( P =0.0002). Conclusions— The mitral lateral/medial e′ ratio is reversed in three fourths of patients with CP. All annular velocities are lower in secondary compared to primary CP before pericardiectomy. After pericardiectomy, there is reduction of all annular velocities and normalization of the mitral lateral/medial e′ ratio.