Hashemi, Milad Bonakdar

Abstract Introduction Treatment of patients with obstructive lower urinary tract symptoms has various side effects on their quality of sexual life. Objective This study aimed to compare the effects of Rezum and Rezurp (a combination of Rezum for lateral lobes and TURP for the median lobe) on erections, retrograde ejaculation, and subjective orgasm experience in patients with a significant median lobe. Methods This is a retrospective cohort study that includes patients who underwent Rezum and Rezurp between January 2021 and January 2024. Sexual outcomes were assessed at 3 months and a median follow up phone call was 33 months. Patients were queried: Any changes in erections (yes/no) and changes in ejaculation (yes/no). If yes to changes, patients were asked to further define and characterize their responses including specific effect on orgasm. The effect of surgery on sexual outcomes was explored by chi-square analysis with P ≤ 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results Sexual outcomes were obtained for 78/89 patients in the Rezurp and 97/107 patients in the Rezum group. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics, including age, prostate volume, and medication regimens, between the two groups, as shown in Table 1. The results indicated that 78% (61/78) and 83% (86/97) of Rezurp and Rezum patients experienced no change in ejaculation. Total ejaculation loss was seen only in two Rezurp patients. Ejaculatory changes between the two groups were not significantly different, with 13.8% and 4.23% worsening for Rezurp and Rezum, respectively (P = 0.08). Changes in erections and orgasm satisfaction were not statistically significant between the two groups (P = 0.76 and 0.54, respectively). Subjective worsening in orgasm quality for Rezurp and Rezum was not different between groups (P = 0.54), with 6.4% and 4.1% worsening, respectively (Table 2). Conclusions Rezurp and Rezum have similar sexual function outcomes. Disclosure No.

Abstract Background Sexual Medicine Society of North America (SMSNA) fellowships offer variable experience in sexual health domains: erectile dysfunction, Peyronie’s disease, male infertility, male hypogonadism (low testosterone), reconstruction (including male incontinence), benign prostatic hyperplasia, gender affirmation surgery, sexual mental health, and female sexual dysfunction. Aim To evaluate baseline and postbootcamp understanding and trust in these domains. Methods In 2023, 28 of 31 urologists currently enrolled in SMSNA-endorsed fellowships participated in a 3.5-day training bootcamp in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Participants were asked to complete pre- and postbootcamp surveys. The bootcamp curriculum offered American Urological Association guidelines and case-based lectures, hands-on clinical training with cadavers (penile surgery) and models (collagenase training), and interaction with industry. Outcomes Changes in knowledge, independence, and trust in performing the procedures, as well as billing issues and feedback for future bootcamps. Results Prebootcamp surveys revealed vastly varied residency experience. Reported time with an expert faculty member was greatest for benign prostatic hyperplasia and least for female sexual dysfunction, gender affirmation surgery, and low testosterone. The lowest prebootcamp confidence in performing surgery independently was for penile grafting procedures and elevating the neurovascular bundle. Postbootcamp results revealed several areas of significant improvement in confidence (P ≤ .03): intralesional injections for Peyronie’s disease, manual modeling, penile plication, penile grafting procedures, and elevating the neurovascular bundle. There was a trend for improved confidence with the insertion of inflatable (P = .05) and semirigid (P = .08) penile prostheses. Nonsignificant improvement occurred in artificial urinary sphincter surgery (P = .12). Participants graded the bootcamp very highly and requested that next year’s bootcamp have more content on female sexual dysfunction, male incontinence, and low testosterone, as well as more hands-on skills sessions and case-based lecture formats. Clinical Implications Offering a bootcamp with hands-on instruction could significantly improve urologists’ knowledge and confidence. Strengths and Limitations As the main strength, this study was the first specialized bootcamp for urologists in the subject of men’s health, taking into account hands-on and cadaver laboratories, as well as highlighting industrial and pharmaceutical products. The small sample size was the major limitation. Conclusions Current SMSNA fellows present with varied levels of experience and confidence across sexual health domains. Notable confidence improvements were seen with topics that combined didactic lectures with hands-on trainings.