Chatzisofroniou, George

Abstract Computational analysis of speech enables precise, objective measurements of a behavioral signal closely linked to manic episodes. In a prospective cohort study conducted in Rochester, MN ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05956340 ) , eighteen English-speaking adults voluntarily hospitalized for a manic episode of Bipolar I Disorder between August 2023 and September 2024 were enrolled. Participants completed semi-structured research interviews during both acute episodes and remission, with manic symptom severity assessed at each session using the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Across 57 recorded interviews, temporal prosodic features were extracted using automated computational algorithms. After adjusting for individual differences and moderating effects, participant articulation rate (β = 0.24, p = 0.0038), speech rate variability (β = 0.23, p = 0.0041), floor transfer offset (β = -0.31, p = 0.007), and speaking duration (β = 0.54, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with manic symptom severity. These temporal elements classified manic (CV AUC = 0.85) and remission (CV AUC = 0.83) status, highlighting their potential as monitoring and prognostic biomarkers for manic episodes.

Background: Bipolar disorder (BD) involves significant mood and energy shifts reflected in speech patterns. Detecting these patterns is crucial for diagnosis and monitoring, currently assessed subjectively. Advances in natural language processing offer opportunities to objectively analyze them. Aims: To (i) correlate speech features with manic-depressive symptom severity in BD, (ii) develop predictive models for diagnostic and treatment outcomes, and (iii) determine the most relevant speech features and tasks for these analyses. Methods: This naturalistic, observational study involved longitudinal audio recordings of BD patients at euthymia, during acute manic/depressive phases, and after-response. Patients participated in clinical evaluations, cognitive tasks, standard text readings, and storytelling. After automatic diarization and transcription, speech features, including acoustics, content, formal aspects, and emotionality, will be extracted. Statistical analyses will (i) correlate speech features with clinical scales, (ii) use lasso logistic regression to develop predictive models, and (iii) identify relevant speech features. Results: Audio recordings from 76 patients (24 manic, 21 depressed, 31 euthymic) were collected. The mean age was 46.0 ± 14.4 years, with 63.2% female. The mean YMRS score for manic patients was 22.9 ± 7.1, reducing to 5.3 ± 5.3 post-response. Depressed patients had a mean HDRS-17 score of 17.1 ± 4.4, decreasing to 3.3 ± 2.8 post-response. Euthymic patients had mean YMRS and HDRS-17 scores of 0.97 ± 1.4 and 3.9 ± 2.9, respectively. Following data pre-processing, including noise reduction and feature extraction, comprehensive statistical analyses will be conducted to explore correlations and develop predictive models. Conclusions: Automated speech analysis in BD could provide objective markers for psychopathological alterations, improving diagnosis, monitoring, and response prediction. This technology could identify subtle alterations, signaling early signs of relapse. Establishing standardized protocols is crucial for creating a global speech cohort, fostering collaboration, and advancing BD understanding.