Abstract P1-14-02: Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) data from ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) a randomized neoadjuvant trial comparing FEC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (FEC → P+T) with paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC plus trastuz
Abstract Background ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) found pathological complete response rates in women with operable HER2-positive breast cancer were similar with FEC → P+T (Arm 1) and P+T → FEC+T (Arm 2) where treatment was administered as 5-FU 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 day 1 of a 21-day cycle x 4; paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 weekly x 12 and trastuzumab 4 mg/kg once then 2 mg/kg weekly x 11. We now report DFS and OS results with a median follow up of 4.4 years (range: 26 days to 6.2 years). Methods All patients who began study treatment were included in the analyses. Stratified log rank tests and stratified proportional hazard models were used to assess differences in DFS and OS from randomization between treatment arms. Results From September 15, 2007 to December 15, 2011, 282 women with HER2-positive breast cancer were enrolled. Two patients randomized to arm 1 withdrew consent prior to treatment and are excluded from these analyses. Patient and disease characteristics of the remaining 280 women (arm 1, n=138; arm 2, n=142) were similar between treatment arms. Recurrences and deaths are shown in the table. DFS were not found to differ with respect to treatment arm (stratified logrank p=0.6870; HR stratified (Arm2/Arm1)=0.88; 95%CI: 0.48-1.61). Also, OS was not found to differ with respect to treatment arm (stratified logrank p=0.8790; HR stratified (Arm2/Arm1)=1.07; 95%CI: 0.43-2.69). Conclusions Concurrent administration of trastuzumab with anthracyclines offers no additional benefit in terms of achieving pathologic complete response or improving survival and is not needed. FEC → P+TP+T → FEC+T Arm 1Arm 2n138142Recurrences2022Deaths811 Grant Support: U10 CA76001 The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00513292. Citation Format: Buzdar AU, Suman VJ, Meric-Bernstam F, Leitch AM, Ellis MJ, Boughey JC, Unzeitig GW, Royce ME, Ewer MS, Hunt KK. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) data from ACOSOG Z1041 (Alliance) a randomized neoadjuvant trial comparing FEC followed by paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (FEC → P+T) with paclitaxel plus trastuzumab followed by FEC plus trastuzumab (P+T → FEC+T) in HER2-positive operable breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-14-02.
Abstract PD06-08: Size Matters: Incorporation of Sentinel Lymph Node (SLN) Metastasis Size into a Nomogram Predicting NonSLN Involvement in SLN Positive Breast Cancer Patients
Abstract Purpose: Emerging data from cooperative group trials suggests that not all patients with a positive SLN require completion axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). The controversy regarding who will benefit from additional nodal clearance continues, suggesting a need for improved tools to predict non-SLN involvement. We hypothesized that the size of a SLN metastasis evaluated as a continuous variable would be an important predictor of non-SLN involvement. The goal of this study was to determine clinicopathologic factors including SLN metastasis size that predicted non-SLN involvement and to use these factors to construct an improved predictive nomogram. Methods: Using a prospective database, we identified 509 patients with invasive breast cancer from 1996 - 2007 with a positive SLN who underwent ALND. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Clinicopathologic data including age, primary tumor size, presence of multifocal disease, histology (invasive ductal vs. invasive lobular vs. mixed invasive), tumor grade, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2/neu status, presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI), the number of SLNs identified, number of positive SLNs, the maximum SLN metastasis size and the presence of extranodal extension were recorded. For SLNs described only as containing isolated tumor cells, size was recorded as 0.1 mm. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of positive non-SLNs. Using these variables, a nomogram was constructed and subsequently validated using an external cohort of 464 patients. Results: On univariate analysis, the following factors were predictive of positive non-SLNs: number of SLN identified (p<.001), number of positive SLN (p<.001), maximum SLN metastasis size (p<.001), extranodal extension (p<.001), primary tumor size (p=.001), LVI (p=.019) and histology (p=.034). On multivariate analysis, all factors remained significant at the 5% level except LVI. A nomogram was created using these variables. When applied to an external cohort, the nomogram was accurate and discriminating with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of .73 (95% CI: .68 - .77). Conclusions: SLN metastasis size is predictive for identifying additional disease in the axilla. These data have been incorporated into a nomogram that accurately predicts the likelihood of having additional, non-SLN metastasis suggesting that routine reporting of the SLN metastasis size would assist with clinical decision making regarding the need to perform a completion ALND. Figures available in online version. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2010;70(24 Suppl):Abstract nr PD06-08.