Makhtin, Maya

Abstract Background Dermatological health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) may be adversely affected by various factors, including skin cancer. However, there has been limited assessment of dermatological HRQoL in SOTRs. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of skin cancer on quality of life (QoL) in SOTRs and to compare HRQoL measures between SOTRs with and without skin cancer. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Mayo Clinic Florida from June 2023 to March 2024. Adult patients who underwent solid organ transplantation between June 1995 and December 2023 were assessed using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Skindex-29 questionnaires. For SOTRs with keratinocyte carcinoma (KC), the Basal and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Quality of Life (BaSQoL) questionnaire was also administered. Results A total of 150 adult SOTRs were included, with 82 having developed post-transplant skin cancer, including melanoma and keratinocyte carcinomas (KC). SOTRs with skin cancer were older at first transplant (Median: 61.8 vs. 57.3 years, P = 0.0073) and had a higher proportion of males (76.8% vs. 55.9%, P = 0.0086). Fitzpatrick skin type III-VI was less prevalent (8.5% vs. 38.2%, P < 0.0001). The frequency of SCC and BCC was 92.7% and 41.5%, respectively. DLQI scores were higher in SOTRs with skin cancer, however, the difference was not statistically significant (P ≥ 0.065). SOTRs with skin cancer had higher total Skindex-29 scores (P = 0.012) and “emotion” subscale scores (P = 0.0049), indicating a negative impact on QoL. BaSQoL scores showed a moderate negative effect on QoL, with a higher number of KCs correlating with lower QoL (P < 0.05). Female gender had higher DLQI total score (P = 0.0042) and BaSQoL diagnosis and treatment (P = 0.031). Conclusions: SOTRs with skin cancer exhibited lower overall QoL, with a greater number of skin cancers linked to more pronounced negative impacts on QoL across all assessment instruments. Female gender was also associated with lower QoL scores. Recognizing the potential for reduced QoL in SOTRs is essential for developing tailored management strategies to support this population.

ABSTRACT Background Virtual interviews may limit an applicant’s ability to ascertain the culture of a training program. No-stakes campus visits (NSCVs) have been offered but their value is unknown. Objective The purpose of our study was to determine factors that influence applicants’ rank lists and determine barriers to and perceptions of NSCVs and their impact on applicants’ final rank lists. Methods All interviewed applicants of graduate medical education (GME) programs who agreed to participate in the study were emailed a survey after the 2023 National Resident Matching Program Match. The survey contained sections on demographics, perspectives on factors affecting ranking decisions, and perceptions of NSCVs. Results Of 796 applicants, 183 (22.9%) who interviewed at 16 different Mayo Clinic GME programs responded to the survey. Of 131 respondents who answered whether they accepted an NSCV offer, 39 (29.8%) accepted. Of 35 respondents who answered whether they thought attending NSCVs impacted their rank, 19 (54.3%) were either uncertain or said yes. Of 34 respondents who answered whether the NSCV influenced their ranking of the program, 16 (47.1%) said their rank did not change, 12 (35.3%) said they ranked the program higher, and 5 (14.7%) said they ranked the program lower. For respondents who did not attend NSCVs, financial burden and lack of time were primary reasons. Conclusions NSCVs are perceived positively by most respondents. Many either believed they influenced their position on the program’s rank list or were unsure. Most respondents said NSCVs either improved or did not change their ranking of the program.