Gomes, Pedro Lança

ABSTRACT Objective Surgical repair and 3D‐printed customized septal prosthesis (3D‐PCSP) are options for septal perforation treatment. We performed a study to compare the clinical outcomes of surgery and 3D‐PCSP using the NOSE‐Perf Scale (NPfS). Methods A chart review was performed on patients undergoing surgical repair or 3D‐PCSP placement between January 2018 and July 2024. The change in NPfS was used as primary endpoint. Demographics, ASA score, perforation size, etiology, and follow‐up duration were reported. Results Thirty‐five patients, 23 for surgical repairs and 12 for 3D‐PCSP, were included in this review [median (IQR)]. In the surgical repair group, perforation length and height measured 12 (10–18) mm and 10 (8–15) mm, respectively. Baseline NPfS was 24 (16–32), and this decreased to 8 (6–13) following surgical repair ( p < 0.001). Follow‐up time was 12 (5–21) months. In the 3D‐PCSP group, septal perforation length and height measured 25 (15–30) mm and 17 (15–20) mm, respectively. The baseline NPfS was 17 (3–24.5), and this decreased to 9.5 (7–13) following 3D‐PCSP placement ( p = 0.001). The follow‐up was 18.4 (16–23) months. NPfS reduction was greater for surgical repair ( p = 0.018). Conclusions Surgery and 3D‐PCSP offer meaningful symptom relief for NSP patients. Treatment decisions should be individualized through shared decision‐making that considers patient comorbidities, preferences, surgeon experience, and risk tolerance. In this cohort, surgical repair was associated with greater NPfS reduction compared with 3D‐PCSP placement. Level of Evidence 3.

ABSTRACT Objectives We evaluated the impact of teprotumumab therapy ( TT ) introduction on orbital decompression ( OD ) utilization for thyroid eye disease ( TED ) and compared rates of significant exophthalmos reduction ( SER ) and diplopia between TT and OD . Methods Newly diagnosed TED patients treated pre (2015–2020) and post teprotumumab (2020–2025) FDA approval were identified from the EHR . Utilization trends, diplopia rates, and immediate (≤ 6 weeks post‐intervention) and long‐term follow‐up SER (≥ 2 mm reduction) were studied. Results Of 406 TED patients, 53 (36.8%) underwent OD in the pre‐ TT cohort ( n = 144). Post‐teprotumumab approval ( n = 262), primary OD was performed in 29 (11.1%), of which 3 (10.3%) were subsequently placed on TT ; primary TT was used in 68/262 (25.9%) with subsequent OD performed in 9 (13.2%). The remaining patients used other treatments (corticosteroids, orbital radiation, rituximab, tocilizumab, etc.). In the overall cohort, immediate SER was achieved in 94.4% of OD versus 83.8% of TT patients ( p = 0.028), with greater median reduction in the OD group (5 vs. 4 mm; p = 0.001). At long‐term follow‐up (median 13 vs. 12 months), SER was sustained in 85.4% of OD and 62.9% of TT patients ( p = 0.042). Pre‐therapy diplopia was more prevalent in TT vs. OD patients (79.4% vs. 59.7%; p = 0.019). New‐onset posttreatment diplopia was higher in the OD group (20.7% vs. 5.9%; p = 0.008). Conclusions Rates of OD surgery declined following FDA approval of teprotumumab. OD achieved sustained and greater exophthalmos reduction but carried a higher risk of diplopia. Contemporaneous OD indications may have evolved to use in TT‐recalcitrant TED or those in need of urgent decompression. Level of Evidence 4.

Key Points Contemporary aspirin exacerbated respiratory disorder (AERD) therapy commonly includes aspirin desensitization (55%) and biologics (48%). Aspirin desensitization therapy has higher discontinuation rates than biologics. Patients receiving biologics are younger, and ∼25% of the patients switch to other agents.

ABSTRACTObjectivesSaddle nose deformity (SND) can be associated with nasal septal perforation (NSP). Both SND and NSP are observed in granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) patients. This study aimed to compare the prevalence and severity of SND in GPA vs. non‐GPA patients with NSP.MethodologyNSP patients who visited tertiary rhinology or facial plastic surgery clinics from January 2010 through December 2023 were grouped into GPA and non‐GPA cohorts. The area of NSP, SND incidence, and SND severity (Daniel and Brenner's classification) were compared between the cohorts.ResultsOf 168 patients identified with NSP, 18 had GPA and 150 had non‐GPA diagnoses. Twelve GPA patients and 10 non‐GPA patients had SND. The odds ratio for SND association in GPA patients with NSP vs. non‐GPA patients was 31.3 (95% CI: 9.5–102.9), and 19.4 (95% CI: 4.3–87.7) after controlling for the NSP area. GPA patients with SND had a larger NSP area (median 670 mm2, IQR: 315.5–1061.3) compared to non‐GPA patients with SND (175.3 mm2, 113.1–204.1; p < 0.001). The severity of SND was similar between GPA and the non‐GPA group (p = 0.09). The area of NSP did not predict the severity of SND (p = 0.17).ConclusionGPA diagnosis was associated with larger NSPs and a higher risk of SND compared to non‐GPA etiologies; however, the severity of saddling did not differ between GPA and non‐GPA etiologies. GPA is an independent risk factor associated with SND irrespective of the size of septal perforation. The NSP area did not predict the severity of SND.Level of Evidence: 4.

Background/Objectives: Although endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) has been widely accepted as the procedure of choice for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO) management due to most etiologies, concerns regarding the reactivation of disease and involvement of surrounding structures add to hesitation in its utilization for granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) patients. No study has directly compared outcomes of external vs. endoscopic DCR in GPA patients. This information can be helpful for patient counselling and choosing a personalized surgical approach for the best results. Methods: A scoping review of the literature was performed in January 2024. The following databases were searched using a combination of MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) and keywords: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Scopus, and Web of Science. This scoping review is not registered. Medical records of two GPA patients who underwent endoscopic DCR at our center were reviewed. Results: The search yielded 96 articles; 15 articles met the inclusion criteria for a full review. Six studies with 22 procedures reported 100% success with endoscopic DCR. Nine studies with 122 procedures reported success in 88.5% of cases with external DCRs. Additional perioperative immunosuppression was recommended in patients with severe mucosal inflammation. The case series presents the disease course, details of surgery, and perioperative management in two GPA patients with NLDO who underwent endoscopic DCR successfully. Conclusions: Endoscopic DCR was associated with equivalent or better success rates and lower complications compared to external DCR in GPA patients. Ensuring disease remission state and appropriate immunomodulatory therapy can help prevent the proposed risk of endonasal disease reactivation with endoscopic DCR.

Abstract Reconstruction of clival defects may be challenging in expanded endonasal skull base surgery. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the outcomes of vascularized flaps used for clival reconstruction. The following databases were searched using a combination of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords related to clival reconstruction in July 2024: Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Studies reporting outcomes of clival reconstruction with vascularized free and pedicled flaps in patients were selected for complete review. Twenty-three studies were included for detailed study. Clival reconstruction with free flaps was done in 18 patients; 17 had a successful repair, outcome was not reported for 1. Facial vessels were preferred for microvascular anastomosis. Radial artery forearm flap and anterolateral thigh flap were most utilized. Pedicled flaps were used in 68 patients, with reported success in 85.3%. Nasoseptal flap was the most common intranasal flap, used in 34 patients with successful reconstruction in 85.3%. Temporoparietal fascia flap was the most common extranasal flap, successfully used in 13 patients. Intranasal pedicled flaps, wherever available, were preferably used for primary reconstruction; extranasal flaps were the next choice. Free flaps were reserved for salvage reconstruction due to prior failed or unavailable local pedicled flaps. Satisfactory reconstructive outcomes are reported using pedicled and free flaps. The flap of choice is determined by the previous surgical history, radiotherapy, wound vascularity, defect size, overall health of the surrounding nasal mucosa, simultaneous clival surgery, and the preferred pedicle transposition route (free flaps).

ABSTRACTBackground/AimEosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) is a multisystemic disease associated with nasal polyposis. Multiple biologics are used for managing EGPA, including some approved for nasal polyps (NP). This study investigated real‐world biologic prescription patterns for EGPA and their impact on NP and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) use.MethodsEGPA patients with NP treated with a biologic at any Mayo Clinic site (January 2010 to January 2024) were identified by querying the unified electronic medical record. Patterns of biologic therapy, clinical course, impact on NP, and performance of ESS were studied.ResultsEighty patients were identified. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients underwent ESS, with 62 of 80 (77.5%) undergoing 131 ESS procedures prior to biologic therapy. ESS for recalcitrant NP (47 episodes) was performed on 38 of 80 (47.5%) patients on biologics. Biologic monotherapy was used in 90% (72) of patients; mepolizumab (81.9%) was the most common, followed by rituximab (23.6%), benralizumab (18.1%), and dupilumab (12.5%). Switching of biologics was observed in 28 of 80 patients. Concurrent dual‐biologic therapy was used in eight (10%) patients. For patients on single‐agent biologic therapy, ESS was performed on 52.5% of patients on mepolizumab, 23.5% on rituximab, 42.8% on benralizumab, and 22.2% on dupilumab.ConclusionsMultidisciplinary multi‐modality treatment with biologics and ESS appeared to be the mainstay of controlling NP in EGPA. Mepolizumab was the most frequently used biologic. Dual biologic therapy was necessary in 10% of patients. Overall, 71 of 80 (88.75%) patients had ESS, with almost half the study population (47.5%) undergoing ESS after initiating biologic treatment.