Caldwell, Katharine E.

Importance As the use of robotic cholecystectomy increases, its value remains poorly defined for complex elective cholecystectomy (CEC), where complex gallbladder pathology results in increased technical difficulty. Objective To determine whether a robotic approach is associated with improved clinical outcomes and altered total hospital cost as compared with a laparoscopic approach for patients undergoing CEC. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study analyzed data from an academic hepatobiliary referral center for patients who underwent cholecystectomy from August 2018 to August 2024. CEC was defined by preoperative criteria: prior aborted or partial cholecystectomy, presence of a cholecystostomy tube, and/or history of gallbladder perforation or fistula. Exposure Robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a composite of an unplanned postoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography or interventional radiology procedure. Secondary outcomes included operative time, postoperative complications, and operative and total hospital costs. Results A total of 863 patients underwent cholecystectomy and met inclusion criteria; 525 (60.8%) were female and 338 (39.2%) were male, and their median (IQR) age was 61 (45-71) years. Among patients undergoing CEC, the laparoscopic approach was independently associated with an increased need for unplanned endoscopic or percutaneous intervention compared with the robotic group (odds ratio, 4.24; 95% CI, 1.24-14.52; P = .02). There were no significant differences in postoperative outcomes between the laparoscopic and robotic groups in patients undergoing non-CEC. Patients undergoing the laparoscopic approach had significantly reduced operating room costs when compared with patients undergoing a robotic approach in both the CEC ($7720 vs $8936, respectively) and non-CEC groups ($6368 vs $ 8351, respectively). However, there was no difference in the overall total cost of care between laparoscopic CEC and robotic CEC groups ($14 309 vs $14 476, respectively). The overall total cost of care was significantly higher for patients undergoing robotic non-CEC as compared with laparoscopic non-CEC ($11 416 vs $9925, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance This study found that for complex gallbladder disease, robotic cholecystectomy offers a clinical advantage, reducing complications and downstream interventions without increasing the overall costs of care. These findings suggest strategic application of the robotic platform may offer clinical advantages in high-complexity gallbladder surgery, maximizing patient benefit and resource efficiency.

Abstract Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) improved outcomes in hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) cases, yet adoption is slowed by technical complexity and steep learning curves. This retrospective review sought to characterize MIS training variations across three fellowship pathways: HPB, complex general surgical oncology (CGSO), and transplant (TXP). Methods We analyzed anonymized Fellowship Council case logs (2014-2023) for 146 HPB, 55 CGSO, and 51 TXP fellows seeking AHPBA certification. Procedures were categorized by platform and type. Results HPB fellows logged significantly more total robotic cases (HPB: 12.5, CGSO: 8.5, TXP: 1.0, p <0.01), including robotic pancreaticoduodenectomies (HPB 4.4, CGSO 3.0, TXP 0.2, p <0.01) and robotic distal pancreatectomies (HPB 3.8, CGSO 3.2, TXP 0.6, p <0.01). Although TXP fellows performed more open major liver resections (HPB 24.0, CGSO 24.7, TXP 35.2, p <0.01), robotic anatomic (HPB 2.1, CGSO 1.5, TXP 0.03, p 0.01) and non-anatomic liver resections (HPB 1.8, CGSO 1.4, TXP 0.2, p <0.01) were highest among HPB fellows. Discussion Meaningful differences in MIS operative exposure exist across training pathways, with TXP fellows trailing significantly in robotic experience. These findings highlight a critical need for standardized MIS curricula to ensure technical proficiency across all HPB surgery pipelines.

Objective: This study aims to appraise recommendations from an expert panel of surgical educators on optimizing surgical education and training in the setting of contemporary challenges. Background: The Blue Ribbon Committee (BRC II), a group of surgical educators, was convened to make recommendations to optimize surgical training, considering the current changes in the landscape of surgical education. Surgical trainees were recruited to assess their impressions of the recommendations. Methods: A mixed-methods study design was employed, with a survey, followed by focus group interviews. Participating residents and fellows were recruited through a purposeful sampling approach. Descriptive statistics were applied to analyze the survey data, and a thematic data analysis on interview transcripts was employed. Results: The majority of trainee respondents (n=16) thought that all of the subcommittee recommendations should be included in the final BRC II recommendations and paper. According to the interviews, overall, the feedback from the trainees was positive, with particular excitement around work-life integration, education support and faculty development, and funding pitfalls. Some themes about concerns included a lack of clarity about the recommendations, concern about some recommendations being in conflict with one another, and a disconnect between the initial BRC II survey and the subsequent recommendations. Conclusions: The residents gathered for this focus group were encouraged by the thought, effort, and intention that gathered the surgical leaders across the country to make the recommendations. While the trainees wanted clarity on some areas, the overall opinion was in agreement with the recommendations.