Djurasovic, Mladen

Study Design. Retrospective observational study. Objective. To evaluate whether the combined American Spine Registry and Medicare (ASR/CMS) data yield substantially different findings versus ASR data alone with regard to key parameters such as risk stratification, complication rates, and readmission rates in lumbar surgery investigated through an analysis of 8755 spondylolisthesis cases. Summary of Background Data. Medicare data correlation has been effective for determining revision rates for other procedures, such as total hip replacement. Our aim is to determine whether these findings are translatable in the realm of lumbar spinal surgery investigated through an analysis of 8755 spondylolisthesis cases. Materials and Methods. The American Spine Registry (ASR) was queried for Medicare-eligible patients who underwent lumbar spinal fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. This cohort was analyzed based on ASR data alone in comparison to the same patients in the combined ASR/Medicare (ASR/CMS) data set. The primary outcome of interest was readmission at 30 and 90 days postoperatively. Results. There were 8755 Medicare-eligible cases with a diagnosis of spondylolisthesis within the ASR. The mean age was 72.7 years and 60.8% were female. Medical comorbidities were more frequently detected in the combined ASR/CMS data set, reflected by a higher mean Charlson Comorbidity Index score (3.49 vs. 3.27, P<0.001). Hospital readmission rates were significantly higher in the combined ASR/CMS data set at both 30 days (4.89% vs. 1.83%, P<0.001) and 90 days (7.68% vs. 2.66%, P<0.001), with notable increases in readmissions for infections and medical complications. Discharge disposition remained comparable across data sets, with most patients discharged to home or home health care. Conclusion. This study demonstrates that integrating patient-identified Medicare data with the ASR provides a more comprehensive assessment of outcomes for lumbar spinal fusion surgery as demonstrated through an analysis of 8755 spondylolisthesis cases. These findings, establish the importance of multisource data linkage to overcome the limitations of single-source registries, thereby enhancing data quality for clinical decision-making and quality improvement in spinal surgery.

OBJECTIVE Smoking has been shown to negatively impact spinal health, as well as the outcomes of spinal fusion. Published reports show conflicting data regarding whether smoking negatively impacts patient outcomes following lumbar decompression. The objective of this study was to investigate whether smoking affects the outcomes of patients undergoing lumbar decompression for spinal stenosis or herniated disc. METHODS The Quality Outcomes Database was queried for patients with spinal stenosis or lumbar disc herniation who underwent one- or two-level lumbar decompression without fusion. All patients had preoperative and 12-month outcome measures and were divided into groups of nonsmokers and current smokers. Outcomes were compared between the two groups, as well as the percentage of patients reaching the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) threshold for numeric rating scale (NRS) back and leg pain scores and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). RESULTS Of 17,271 patients, 14,233 were nonsmokers and 3038 were current smokers. Smokers had worse baseline NRS back and leg pain, ODI, and EQ-5D scores and experienced slightly less improvement in all measures following lumbar decompression (p ≤ 0.009), although changes were largely similar, and a high percentage of patients achieved the MCID thresholds for NRS back pain (78% nonsmokers vs 75% smokers), NRS leg pain (79% nonsmokers vs 73% smokers), and ODI (74% nonsmokers vs 68% smokers). Comparison of propensity-matched cohorts did not identify any difference in outcomes in smokers versus nonsmokers. CONCLUSIONS In patients undergoing lumbar decompression for spinal stenosis or herniated disc, smokers demonstrated slightly less improvement in outcomes compared with nonsmokers, and a high proportion of both groups achieved meaningful improvement with surgery. While smoking cessation should be strongly encouraged in all patients, lumbar decompression procedures for spinal stenosis and herniated disc should not be denied to smokers.

OBJECTIVE Some patients treated surgically for grade 1 spondylolisthesis require revision surgery. Outcomes after revision surgery are not well studied. The objective of this study was to determine how revision surgery impacts patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients undergoing decompression only or decompression and fusion (D+F) for grade 1 spondylolisthesis within 5 years of the index surgery. METHODS Patients in the 12 highest Quality Outcomes Database (QOD) enrolling sites with a diagnosis of grade 1 spondylolisthesis were identified and the incidence of revision surgery between the decompression-only and D+F patients were compared. PROs were compared between cohorts requiring revision surgery versus a single index procedure. RESULTS Of 608 patients enrolled, 409 had complete 5-year data available for this study. Eleven (13.3%) of 83 patients underwent revision in the decompression-only group as well as 32 (9.8%) of 326 in the D+F group. For the entire cohort, patients requiring revision had significantly worse PROs at 5 years: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 27.4 versus 19.4, p = 0.008; numeric rating scale for back pain (NRS-BP) 4.1 versus 3.0, p = 0.013; and NRS for leg pain (NRS-LP) 3.4 versus 2.1, p = 0.029. In the decompression-only group, the change in 5-year PROs was not impacted by revision status: ODI 31.9 versus 24.2, p = 0.287; NRS-BP 1.9 versus 2.9, p = 0.325; and NRS-LP 6.2 versus 3.7, p = 0.011. In the D+F group, the change in 5-year PROs was diminished if patients required revision: ODI 19.1 versus 29.1, p = 0.001; NRS-BP 3.0 versus 4.0, p = 0.170; and NRS-LP 2.3 versus 4.6, p = 0.001. CONCLUSIONS The most common reasons for reoperation within 5 years in the decompression-only group were repeat decompression and instability, whereas in the D+F group the most common reason was adjacent-segment disease. The need for revision resulted in modestly diminished benefit compared with patients with no revisions. These differences were greater in the fusion cohort compared with the decompression-only cohort. The mean PRO improvement still far exceeded minimal clinically important difference thresholds for all measures for patients who underwent a revision surgery.

Study Design. Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate what factors predict delayed improvement after surgical treatment of low-grade spondylolisthesis. Summary of Background Data. Lumbar surgery leads to clinical improvement in the majority of patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis. Most patients improve rapidly after surgery, but some patients demonstrate a delayed clinical course. Methods. The Quality and Outcomes Database (QOD) was queried for grade 1 spondylolisthesis patients who underwent surgery who had patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) collected at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months, including back and leg pain Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D). Patients were stratified as “early responders” reaching MCID at 3 months and maintaining improvement through 12 months and “delayed responders” not reaching MCID at 3 months but ultimately reaching MCID at 12 months. These two groups were compared with respect to factors which predicted delayed improvement. Results. Of 608 patients enrolled, 436 (72%) met inclusion criteria for this study. Overall, 317 patients (72.7%) reached MCID for ODI at 12 months following surgery. Of these patients, 249 (78.5%) exhibited a rapid clinical improvement trajectory and had achieved ODI MCID threshold by the 3-month postoperative follow-up. Sixty-eight patients (21.4%) showed a delayed trajectory, and had not achieved ODI MCID threshold at 3 months, but did ultimately reach MCID at 12-month follow-up. Factors associated with delayed improvement included impaired preoperative ambulatory status, better baseline back and leg pain scores, and worse 3-month leg pain scores ( P <0.01). Conclusions. The majority of patients undergoing surgery for low-grade spondylolisthesis reach ODI MCID threshold rapidly, within the first 3 months after surgery. Factors associated with a delayed clinical course include impaired preoperative ambulation status, relatively better preoperative back and leg pain, and persistent leg pain at 3 months.