Back to Authors

Verona, Patricia M

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2641-1986

Mayo Clinic

Division of Data Analysis and Integration Services

Citations 24

Implications of neuroendocrine tumor and diabetes mellitus on patient outcomes and care: A matched case control study.
Karlin, Nina J. , Rone, Kelley , Verona, Patricia M , Coppola, Kyle , Kosiorek, Heidi , Buras, Matthew , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 4, 2020 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 612-612

10.1200/jco.2020.38.4_suppl.612 Get It

612 Background: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on survival in neuroendocrine tumor and the impact of neuroendocrine tumor on glycemic control in DM. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed neuroendocrine tumor with and without DM were matched 1:1 according to age, gender, and year of cancer diagnosis (2005-2017). The file was linked to the electronic medical record to obtain information on DM and neuroendocrine tumor therapies and laboratory results. There were 59 matched pairs (total 118 patients) included in the analysis. We compared characteristics between cases and controls and assessed survival with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Mixed models compared hemoglobin A1c and glucose levels over time. Results: Median age of patients at diagnosis was 67 (40-86); 41% had stage IV disease. Women constituted 49% of the study population; 22% had pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor and 45% had another GI primary neuroendocrine tumor. No differences in race/ethnicity, marital status, alcohol or tobacco use were detected between cancer patients with and without DM. Mean BMI was significantly different between DM and non-DM patients (31.0 [7.90] versus 26.4 [5.27]); p = 0.011. Among those with DM, mean HbA1c during the year following cancer diagnosis was 7.3%. Mean glucose was significantly different between DM (159.1 [43.5] versus non-DM pts 117 [31.5]); p < 0.001. Median follow-up time was 32.8 (2.4-165.4) months in alive patients. Three year survival was estimated at 72% (95% CI: 60-86%) for DM patients versus 80% (95% CI: 70-92%) in non-DM patients by Kaplan Meier method (p = 0.82 log rank test). Hazard ratio (stratification for matched pairs) = 1.33 (95% CI: 0.56 – 3.16; p = 0.51). Conclusions: DM did not adversely impact survival in patients with neuroendocrine tumor. Neuroendocrine tumor and its treatment did not affect glycemic control. This should be reassuring to oncologists and endocrinologists who treat patients with neuroendocrine tumors and diabetes.
Glycemic Control and Survival of Patients With Coexisting Diabetes Mellitus and Gastric Or Esophageal Cancer
Karlin, Nina J. , Buras, Matthew , Verona, Patricia M , Cook, Curtiss B. , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi

Future Science OA | June 26, 2019 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 6 | Pages: No page available

10.2144/fsoa-2019-0038 Get It

MON-008 Use of National Death Index to Assess Cancer Mortality and Diabetes Relationship
Karlin, Nina J. , Buras, Matthew , Verona, Patricia M , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of the Endocrine Society | May 10, 2019 | Volume: 3 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1210/js.2019-mon-008 Get It

Survival and Glycemic Control in Patients With Coexisting Melanoma and Diabetes Mellitus
Karlin, Nina J. , Mangold, Aaron R. , Amin, Shailja B , Buras, Matthew , Verona, Patricia M , Cook, Curtiss B. , Mangold, A R , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi

Future Science OA | March 7, 2019 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 3 | Pages: No page available

10.4155/fsoa-2018-0084 Get It

Mortality and glycemic control among patients with gastric and esophageal cancer and diabetes mellitus.
Karlin, Nina J. , Verona, Patricia M , Buras, Matthew , Kosiorek, Heidi , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 29, 2019 | Volume: 37 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 73-73

10.1200/jco.2019.37.4_suppl.73 Get It

73 Background: This study evaluated the impact of diabetes mellitus (DM) on survival in gastric and esophageal cancer patients, and examined the impact of these cancers on glycemic control in DM. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed gastric and esophageal cancers with DM (n = 92) were identified from the Institutional Cancer Registry and matched to 92 gastric and esophageal cancer patients without DM according to age, gender and year of cancer diagnosis (2006 to 2016). The electronic medical record provided information on DM and cancer therapies and laboratory results. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Cox regression analysis using stratification for matched pairs. Mixed models were used to compare hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glucose during the year following cancer diagnosis. Results: Mean age of the entire cohort was 68 years, 91% were white, 78% were men, and 53% had stage III/IV disease. Adenocarcinoma (79%) was the most common histologic type. BMI was significantly different between DM and non-DM patients (p = 0.006). Alcohol use at time of cancer diagnosis was more prevalent in non-DM patients vs. DM (p = 0.018). Among those with DM, mean HbA1c during the year following cancer diagnosis was 6.8%. Mean glucose was significantly different between DM and non-DM patients (149 mg/dL vs. 116 mg/dL, p < 0.001). For glucose, there was a significant interaction effect (p = 0.005) as DM patients demonstrated a decrease in glucose values over time compared to non-DM patients. Median follow-up time was 35 months. Three year OS was estimated at 46% (95% CI: 36-58%) for DM patients versus 52.0% (95% CI: 41-64%) in non-DM (p = 0.25). Hazard ratio (stratification for matched pairs) was 1.95 (95% CI: 1.14 – 3.43; p = 0.02). Three year PFS was estimated at 40% (95% CI: 31-53%) for DM patients versus 50% (95% CI: 40-63%) for non-DM patients (p = 0.12). Hazard ratio (stratification for matched pairs) was 1.74 (95% CI: 1.04-2.90; p = 0.03). Conclusions: Gastric and esophageal cancer and its treatment did not affect glycemic control. Risks of death and progression are greater in DM patients as compared to non-DM.
Implications of pancreatic cancer with diabetes mellitus on patient outcomes and care: A matched case-control study.
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Verona, Patricia M , Buras, Matthew , Kosiorek, Heidi , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | January 2, 2019 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 239-239

10.1200/jco.2018.36.4_suppl.239 Get It

239 Background: The aim of this case-control study was to determine the impact of DM on survival in pancreatic cancer patients, and to examine the impact of pancreatic cancer on glycemic control in DM. Methods: Ninety-two patients with newly diagnosed pancreatic cancer from 2007 to 2015 with DM were identified from the institutional Cancer Registry and matched to ninety-two pancreatic cancer patients without DM according to age, gender, and year of pancreatic cancer diagnosis. The file was linked to the electronic medical record to obtain information on DM and pancreatic cancer therapies, and laboratory results. Overall survival (OS) was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by Cox regression analysis. Mixed models were used to compare hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and glucose over time. Results: Mean age of the entire pancreatic cancer cohort was 70 years, most (92%) were white, most common (88%) histology was adenocarcinoma, and majority (41%) were stage IV. No differences in age, race/ethnicity, histology, or tumor stage were detected between patients with and without DM, although DM patients had higher body mass index (P = 0.014). Mean ca 19-9 (U/ml) was 804 for diabetics, and 395 for non-diabetics. Among those with DM the mean HbA1c during the year following cancer diagnosis was 7.3%. Time (days since diagnosis) was significant in DM patients (p = 0.014) as HbA1c decreased over time. Mean glucose during the year following diagnosis among DM patients was significantly higher compared to non-DM patients [160.6 (SD = 38.0) versus 117.2 (SD = 19.0); p < 0.001]. Both groups had a decline in glucose over time (p = 0.008). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis (median follow-up time of 11.9 months), 2 year overall survival was estimated at 15% [95% CI: 8-24%] for DM patients versus 26% [95% CI: 17-36%] in non-DM patients. Hazard ratio (for matched pairs) was 1.15 (95% CI: 0.75-1.77; p = 0.51). Conclusions: DM did not adversely impact survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Pancreatic cancer did not affect glycemic control. Elevated ca 19-9 in diabetic patients may be an unreliable marker for gauging disease progression.
Implications of melanoma with diabetes mellitus on patient outcomes.
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Verona, Patricia M , Kosiorek, Heidi , Buras, Matthew , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e21595-e21595

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e21595 Get It

Survival and glycemic control in patients with colorectal cancer and diabetes mellitus.
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Verona, Patricia M , Kosiorek, Heidi , Buras, Matthew , Cook, Curtiss B.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | September 5, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: e18755-e18755

10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.e18755 Get It

Survival and Glycemic Control in Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Diabetes Mellitus
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Buras, Matthew , Verona, Patricia M , Cook, Curtiss B. , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi

Future Science OA | August 15, 2018 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 9 | Pages: No page available

10.4155/fsoa-2018-0044 Get It

Survival and Glycemic Control Outcomes Among Patients with Coexisting Pancreatic Cancer and Diabetes Mellitus
Karlin, Nina J. , Amin, Shailja B , Buras, Matthew , Verona, Patricia M , Cook, Curtiss B. , Buras, Matthew R , Kosiorek, Heidi

Future Science OA | February 21, 2018 | Volume: 4 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.4155/fsoa-2017-0144 Get It