Song, Wei

483 Background: Heterogeneity exists in recurrence and survival among patients with intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC). Nucleotyping is the alterations in chromatin organization. We sought to identify the prognostic utility of nucleotyping, tumor stroma ratio (TSR) and DNA ploidy in these patients. Methods: Radical resection of gastric carcinoma (> 15 LNs removed) was performed in 283 patients (stage I, n=73; stage II, n=102; stage III, n=108) at our university hospital between 2010 and 2018. Automated image cytometry tools were used to quantitatively measure nucleotyping, TSR and DNA ploidy. Cutpoints of nucleotyping and TSR were 0.044 and 50%, respectively. Associations of these features with clinicopathological characteristics, time-to-recurrence (TTR) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: Among 283 patients, chromatin heterogeneity, high TSR and non-diploid were significantly associated with larger tumor size, higher T and N stage, and poorer TTR and CSS at 5 years. In a Cox multivariable analysis, nucleotyping and TSR were independently associated with TTR and CSS (P＜0.05) (Table). The top three contributors to TTR were N stage (33.9%), nucleotying (29.7%) and TSR (25.5%). The top three contributors to CSS were N stage (35.6%), nucleotying (29.7%) and TSR (18.0%). As a combined variable, the percent relative contribution of nucleotyping and TSR ranked first for TTR and CSS (56.0%, 50.0%), ahead of N stage (33.4%, 34.6%) and TILs (8.4%, 10.6%). Conclusions: Nucleotyping and TSR were each significantly and independently associated with TTR and CSS, and their combined variable was more strongly prognostic than either alone. Cox multivariable analysis of TTR and CSS. Features TTR HR (95%CI) TTR P value CSS HR (95%CI) CSS P value Tumor size (>3cm vs ≤3cm) 1.10 (0.48-2.54) 0.83 0.77 (0.35-1.70) 0.56 T stage (T3-T4 vs T1-T2) 1.07 (0.46-2.49) 0.87 1.41 (0.53-3.76) 0.49 N stage (N2N3 vs N0N1) 2.84 (1.39-5.78) <0.01 7.69 (3.37-17.55) <0.01 Adjuvant Therapy (with vs without) 1.32 (0.72-2.40) 0.37 0.85 (0.48-1.52) 0.59 TB (high vs low) 1.29 (0.62-2.69) 0.50 1.61 (0.85-3.07) 0.15 TILs（low vs high） 1.73 (0.96-3.13) 0.07 1.90 (1.06-3.40) 0.03 Nucleotyping (Chromatin heterogeneous vs Chromatin homogeneous) 2.19 (1.21-3.99) 0.01 3.44 (1.96-6.03) <0.01 TSR (high vs low) 2.12 (1.16-3.82) 0.01 2.51 (1.43-4.41) <0.01 DNA ploidy (Non-diploid vs Diploid) 1.20 (0.55-2.63) 0.65 0.98 (0.44-2.15) 0.95 1 TTR, time-to-recurrence; 2 CSS, cancer specific survival.

Abstract Background Tumor microenvironment (TME) characteristics including tumor stroma ratio (TSR), tumor budding (TB), and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were examined in resected gastric cancer. These TME features have been shown to indicate metastatic potential in colon cancer, and intestinal-type gastric cancer (IGC) has pathological similarities with that malignancy. Methods TSR, TB, and TILs were quantified in routine histological sections from 493 patients with IGC who underwent radical resection at 2 university hospitals in China from 2010 to 2016. TME variables were dichotomized as follows: TSR (50%), TILs (median), TB per international guidelines (4 buds/0.785mm2), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) per survival ROC. Association of TME features with patient clinicopathological characteristics, time-to-recurrence (TTR), and cancer-specific-survival (CSS) were examined using univariate and multivariate analysis, including a relative contribution analysis by Cox regression. Results Patients whose tumors showed high TSR or high TB or low TILs were each significantly associated with increased T and N stage, higher histological grade, and poorer TTR and CSS at 5 years. Only TSR and N stage were independently associated with TTR and CSS after adjustment for covariates. PLR was only independently associated with TTR after adjustment for covariates. Among the variables examined, only TSR was significantly associated with both TTR (HR 1.72, 95% CI, 1.14-2.60, P = .01) and CSS (HR 1.62, 95% CI, 1.05-2.51, P = .03) multivariately. Relative contribution to TTR revealed that the top 3 contributors were N stage (45.1%), TSR (22.5%), and PLR (12.9%), while the top 3 contributors to CSS were N stage (59.9%), TSR (14.7%), and PLR (10.9%). Conclusions Among the examined TME features, TSR was the most robust for prognostication and was significantly associated with both TTR and CSS. Furthermore, the relative contribution of TSR to patient TTR and CSS was second only to nodal status.