Braat, Jonathan

e21573 Background: In melanoma, biomarkers such as lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) have been linked to disease progression. This study aims to compare survival outcomes in melanoma patients based on high versus low levels of these biomarkers, assessing their impact on survival within their respective groups. By evaluating these biomarkers, we hope to identify potential prognostic indicators that could guide treatment decisions and improve personalized care in melanoma management. Methods: We conducted a retrospective survival analysis of 43 melanoma patients, excluding 16 due to incomplete data at Dignity Health Cancer Institute in Phoenix, Arizona. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to compare survival between groups with high vs low levels of biomarkers. Patients were stratified by median values for LDH, NLR, and the presence of detectable ctDNA. Patients included in the analysis were treated systemically with pembrolizumab, encorafenib/binimetinib, nivolumab, or ipilimumab/nivolumab. Survival curves were generated, and statistical significance was assessed using log-rank tests. Data was sourced from our electronic medical record and Signatera™ assay to obtain the primary endpoints. Specimens were standardized in accordance with Natera’s™ specifications. All analyses were executed in GraphPad Prism software. Results: When stratifying by ctDNA, 18 patients had undetectable ctDNA, while 9 had detectable ctDNA with an average level of 1330 (SD = 2067). The median survival for the high ctDNA group was 220 days, whereas the low ctDNA group had significantly longer survival, with only two deaths observed (p = 0.006) within the time period. For LDH, using a cutoff of 204 (IQR = 90.5), patients with high LDH had a median survival of 220 days, while those with low LDH had a significantly longer survival (p = 0.004). When comparing NLR with a cutoff at 2.94 (IQR = 3.7), no significant difference in survival was found between high and low NLR groups (p = 0.72). Conclusions: Our findings show that patients with higher levels of ctDNA and LDH have significantly shorter survival compared to those with low levels of these biomarkers. While NLR did not show a significant survival difference, the study suggests that higher ctDNA and LDH could be important markers for identifying patients at greater risk of poor outcomes. These results underscore the potential value of monitoring these biomarkers to assess disease progression and survival in melanoma patients. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to validate these findings and refine melanoma prognostic models.

e23536 Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has gained prominence as a potential indirect marker for minimal residual disease (MRD) in various cancers, including soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Previous studies have suggested that indirect hematologic ratios – such as Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Monocyte-Lymphocyte Ratio (MLR), Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), and Eosinophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (ELR) may correlate with worse outcomes. We sought to evaluate the correlation of NLR, MLR, PLR and ELR in a real world cohort of Non-Hispanic Whites (NHW) and Hispanics (H) with advanced STS. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review at Dignity Health Cancer institute using our Electronic Medical Records (EMR) and Signatera™ assay to obtain our data points. Inclusion criteria were STS patients of all ages and stages of disease with complete records. We reviewed 33 patient charts, 14 NHW and 19 H patients. Of the NHW population, 11 were male (M) and 3 females (F). For the H population, 14 were M, and 5 were F. We utilized Spearman's rank correlation coefficient to assess monotonic relationships between ct-DNA levels and the hematologic ratios. ct-DNA was quantified through standardized assays per Protocol, with the resultant values treated as continuous variables in our statistical analyses. Power considerations, based on expected effect sizes and type I error rate adjustments were performed. Results: The Spearman’s correlation coefficients and p-values indicated varied associations across ethnic groups. For NHW, the correlations were generally weak and non-significant (NLR: r = 0.18, p = 0.54; MLR: r = -0.04, p = 0.89; PLR: r = 0.35, p = 0.21; ELR: r = 0.001, p = 1.00). Conversely, in the Hispanic cohort, stronger and statistically significant correlations were observed, particularly with NLR (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001) and MLR (r = 0.70, p < 0.001). Overall, the correlations across the entire study population did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: This study revealed notable racial variations, particularly in the H population, in the relationship between ctDNA levels and hematologic ratios. The noteworthy associations found with NLR (r = 0.78, p < 0.0001) and MLR (r = 0.70, p < 0.001) highlight the possible usefulness of these ctDNA and these indirect biomarkers in assessing disease status in STS. These findings suggest the possibility of using hematologic ratios, particularly in the Hispanic population, as markers of disease progression similar as ctDNA. Hematologic ratios are more easily accessible to the general population compared to ctDNA in many underserved countries and communities. Future studies with larger cohorts are need to further analyze its validity.

e23535 Background: Our study aims to examine the relationship between the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in patients diagnosed with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). There is emerging yet limited data on the applicability of ctDNA in STS. LDH is a cheaper readily available test that has been associated with unfavorable overall survival in different malignancies. This research aims to understand the correlation between ctDNA and LDH as a tool to assess its utility as indirect markers of response to treatment in STS. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective chart review on patients diagnosed with STS. Eligibility criteria included a confirmed diagnosis and available measurements of both ctDNA and LDH levels. Correlation was compared between Non-hispanic whites (NHW) and Hispanics (H). Data was sourced from our electronic medical record and Signatera™ assay to obtain the primary endpoints. Specimens were standardized in accordance to Natera’s™ specifications. Study endpoints included the correlation coefficients between ctDNA and LDH levels. A two-stage study design was applied for a robust analysis. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (denoted as r) was employed for statistical analysis, assessing the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between ctDNA and LDH levels. Marker values were treated as continuous variables in these analyses. All analyses were executed in GraphPad Prism software. Results: The cohort comprised 33 patients with STS (14 NHW, 19 H). The median LDH in H was 189 (interquartile range (IQR) = 184) vs 184 (IQR = 105) in NHW. Comparatively, the median ctDNA in H was 0 (IQR = 39.3) and also 0 (IQR = 11.1) in NHW. The overall correlation between ctDNA and LDH levels was moderate positive (r = 0.5, p = 0.002), indicating a consistent, though not necessarily linear, relationship. Subgroup analysis showed r = 0.19 (p = 0.52) in NHW and r = 0.43 (p = 0.1) in H groups, suggesting ethnic variability in the ctDNA-LDH correlation. These findings were statistically significant within the predefined confidence limits and probability values. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated a significant correlation between ctDNA levels and LDH in STS patients, implying that higher ctDNA may be associated with higher LDH levels. This association can lead clinicians in monitoring LDH more frequently as an indirect marker of response to treatment in STS. This correlation suggests an increased tumor burden with a higher inflammatory response, with variations across different racial groups. The wider availability of LDH testing compared to ctDNA in many centers highlights LDH's potential as an indirect marker for STS. Further research with larger prospective cohorts is essential to confirm LDH's role paired with ctDNA in guiding treatment decisions in STS, enhancing its utility in clinical practice.

e23534 Background: The use of tumor genomic profile (TGP) has led to improved genomic-directed therapies in many solid cancers. Due to its heterogeneity, soft tissues sarcomas (STS) have not benefited much from these genomic advances. Emerging research indicates that about 30% STS have actionable alterations which can lead to potential treatment options (Gounder et al. Nature 2022). Our study aimed to compare the differences in genomic-directed therapy between Non-Hispanic White (NHW) and Hispanic (H) patients with STS at Dignity Health Cancer Institute. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of medical records using the electronic medical record. Our study specifically examined patients diagnosed with STS, with a sample size of 14 NHW and 19 H individuals.The eligibility criteria consisted of known diagnosis of STS with completed TGP. We conducted a descriptive analysis using GraphPad Prism Software, where mutations were evaluated as continuous variables. The statistical significance of differences between groups was assessed using an unpaired t-test, with a significance level of < 0.05. Results: We found 73 tumor alterations, with 11 potentially targetable (15.2%). Most patients had negative to low tumor mutational burden (0-2 mut/Mb) with only 2 patients with high TMB ( > 10 mut/Mb). The most common mutations were TP53 and CDK4 with 9 patients (12%) each. The NHW group had an average of 2.57 mutations (standard deviation = 2.87), whereas the H group had an average of 1.42 mutations (standard deviation = 1.35). The median values were 2 and 1, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.21). The average for mutations of unknown significance was 1.54 in NHW individuals, while it was 1.00 in Hispanics. In the NHW group showed 11 males and 3 females, while the H group included 14 males and 5 females. There was no significant difference in gender representation between the two groups (p = 1). 3 patients (9%) received non-FDA approved treatments based on TGP (1 CDKN2A-abemaciclib, 1 CDK4-ribociclib and 1 IDH1-ivosidenib) and 2 patients (6.6%) were enrolled in clinical trials. Conclusions: Our investigation reveals that there is no statistically significant disparity in the frequency of mutations between NHW and H groups in our sample. Nevertheless, there was an evident inclination towards an increased frequency of mutations in NHW. Similarly, the occurrence of mutations with uncertain significance was slightly higher in NHWs, although the difference was not statistically significant. Only a minority of patients had targetable mutations or were enrolled in clinical trials. However, the routine use of genomic profiles may lead to more personalized treatments. Our research emphasizes the need to expand the use of comprehensive genomic profiles to increase directed treatments for patients with STS.

e23526 Background: Racial, ethnic, and socioeconomic factors have been implicated in the variability of survival rates among soft tissue sarcoma (STS). These disparities are multifactorial and may reflect differences in disease biology, access to care, treatment responses, and others. In situations where different racial groups have equitable access to healthcare, healthcare disparities can decrease, and survival gaps can narrow. Differences in survival in STS in racial minorities have been poorly studied. Recognizing the potential impact of such disparities, our study thereby contributes to the ongoing discourse on healthcare equity in STS outcomes. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 30 STS patients, stratifying them into Hispanic (H) and non-Hispanic white (NHW) groups at Dignity Health Cancer Institute in Phoenix, Arizona. The Mann-Whitney U test was chosen to compare survival distributions, given the non-normal distribution of our sample. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was applied to determine statistical significance. All analyses were executed in GraphPad Prism software. Results: Our cohort comprised 13 (43%) NHW and 17 (57%) H patients. The mean ages were 57.2 years for NHW and 48.9 years for H, with a balanced gender distribution across groups. The most common subtypes of STS in NHW were liposarcoma (n = 3, 23.1%), and spindle cell carcinoma (n = 2,15.4%). Comparatively, the most common subtypes of STS in H were liposarcoma (n = 5, 29.4%) and leiomyosarcoma (n = 3, 17.6%). All patients were diagnosed with Stage 4 STS. Treatment modalities differed marginally, with NHW patients undergoing more surgical interventions, while H patients were more frequently administered chemotherapy. Median overall survival from the start of first-line therapy was 412 days for NHW and 500 days for H patients. Despite the longer median overall survival observed in Hispanics, the intergroup difference did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.68). Conclusions: The similar survival times between H and NHW STS patients at our institution may hint at an equitable provision of care across racial demographics in a relatively controlled single-center experience. However, the trend of extended survival in the Hispanic group, while not statistically confirmed, raises questions that merit further inquiry. This study serves as a preliminary exploration into racial disparities in STS, advocating for larger-scale research with more diverse patient populations. Further studies are essential to understand these findings and identify and optimize factors contributing to narrowing the survival gap in minorities, with the goal of enhancing STS prognosis for all racial groups.