Back to Authors

Gerdes, Erin Wissler

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic in Arizona

Citations 2

Trainee perceptions of digital dermatopathology implementation at a multisite academic institution
Reinhart, Jacob P. , Proffer, Sydney L. , Gerdes, Erin Wissler, Cervenka, Derek J., Peters, Margot S. , Comfere, Nneka I. , Johnson, Emma F. , Wieland, Carilyn N. , Gerdes, Erin O. Wissler , Cervenka, Derek, Comfere, Nneka , Larkin, Sydney C , Wissler Gerdes, Erin O , Reinhart, Jacob , Ridgeway, Jennifer L. , Barry, Barbara , Kamath, Celia

Journal of Cutaneous Pathology | July 5, 2024 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 922-924

10.1111/cup.14681 Get It

Digital dermatopathology implementation: Experience at a multisite academic institution
Proffer, Sydney L. , Reinhart, Jacob P. , Gerdes, Erin Wissler, Todd, Austin, Cervenka, Derek J., DiCaudo, David J. , Sokumbi, Olayemi , Johnson, Emma F. , Peters, Margot S. , Wieland, Carilyn N. , Comfere, Nneka I. , Gerdes, Erin O. Wissler , Reinhart, Jacob , Sokumbi, Olayemi , Comfere, Nneka , Larkin, Sydney C , Wissler Gerdes, Erin O , Ridgeway, Jennifer L. , Barry, Barbara , Kamath, Celia

Journal of Cutaneous Pathology | May 24, 2024 | Volume: 51 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 696-704

10.1111/cup.14629 Get It

AbstractBackgroundTechnology has revolutionized not only direct patient care but also diagnostic care processes. This study evaluates the transition from glass‐slide microscopy to digital pathology (DP) at a multisite academic institution, using mixed methods to understand user perceptions of digitization and key productivity metrics of practice change.MethodsParticipants included dermatopathologists, pathology reporting specialists, and clinicians. Electronic surveys and individual or group interviews included questions related to technology comfort, trust in DP, and rationale for DP adoption. Case volumes and turnaround times were abstracted from the electronic health record from Qtr 4 2020 to Qtr 1 2023 (inclusive). Data were analyzed descriptively, while interviews were analyzed using methods of content analysis.ResultsThirty‐four staff completed surveys and 22 participated in an interview. Case volumes and diagnostic turnaround time did not differ across the institution during or after implementation timelines (p = 0.084; p = 0.133, respectively). 82.5% (28/34) of staff agreed that DP improved the sign‐out experience, with accessibility, ergonomics, and annotation features described as key factors. Clinicians reported positive perspectives of DP impact on patient safety and interdisciplinary collaboration.ConclusionsOur study demonstrates that DP has a high acceptance rate, does not adversely impact productivity, and may improve patient safety and care collaboration.