Abstract Background Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor and is associated with a poor prognosis. Repurposed posaconazole (PCZ) has demonstrated efficacy in vitro by targeting key metabolic pathways. The aim of this study was to determine the neuropharmacological profile of PCZ in patients with GBM through a Phase 0 first-in-human trial for this indication (NCT04825275). Methods We conducted an open-label, non-randomized, parallel-arm trial in participants with primary or recurrent GBM. Patients in the treatment arm received oral PCZ for 7-10 days presurgically to achieve steady-state concentrations. Microdialysis catheters were implanted to measure interstitial drug levels. Postoperative tissue and fluid samples were analyzed to evaluate PCZ pharmacokinetics (mass spectrometry) and pharmacodynamics, including vascular density, apoptosis, and metabolite concentrations (lactate and pyruvate) compared to controls. Results The trial was closed early due to slow accrual, enrolling 2 participants in the PCZ arm and three in the control arm. No drug-related safety issues were observed. Although PCZ was undetectable in microdialysate fluid, it accumulated in tumor tissue, with concentrations showing an association with CD31-measured endothelial content. PCZ-treated tumors exhibited trends toward lower BCL2 expression indicative of increased apoptosis, and significantly lower pyruvate levels in the tumor periphery compared to controls. Plasma lactate levels in treated patients normalized to control levels over 24 h. Conclusions Despite limited accrual, this trial provides the first clinical evidence that oral PCZ accumulates in human GBM tissue and shows preliminary signals of metabolic modulation. These findings provide biological rationale warranting further clinical investigation, potentially utilizing direct tissue sampling rather than microdialysis.
A Rat Model of Second Impact Syndrome in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury: Evidence of Facial Hypersensitivity, Neurological and Other Behavioral Alterations, and Immunological and Histopathological Tissue Changes
Abstract Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can lead to chronic complications, including headache and facial hypersensitivity. Second-impact syndrome (SIS), occurring when a second TBI precedes recovery from an initial injury, often causes severe long-term symptoms. Neuroinflammation is implicated, but the comprehensive pathophysiology of SIS remains unclear. This study characterized neurological/behavioral outcomes, facial nociception, plasma inflammatory markers, and central nervous system (CNS) histopathology in rat models of SIS and single mild TBI. Female Wistar rats (n = 6/group) were assigned to naïve control, sham surgery, single impact (TBI), or double impact (SIS; intervals: 1h, 24h, 3d, 7d, 14d). Mild TBI was induced using a modified Marmarou weight-drop model. Assessments (facial mechanical sensitivity via von Frey, Neurological Severity Scale (NSS), Neurobehavioral Scale (NBS)) were performed pre-injury and on days 1,3,5,7 post-injury. Plasma IL-6 and TNF-α were measured by ELISA. Histopathology (H&E) assessed CNS inflammation. All impact groups developed transient facial mechanical allodynia and acute neurobehavioral deficits (impaired NSS/NBS at day 1). SIS groups, particularly with longer intervals (≥ 24h), exhibited more prolonged facial allodynia and significant neurological deficits compared to single TBI at specific timepoints. Plasma cytokines showed minimal changes. Histopathology revealed significantly elevated CNS inflammation in both TBI and SIS groups versus controls, with SIS groups (intervals 24h-14d) showing robust responses. Repeated TBI, especially with longer recovery intervals between injuries, results in more severe and prolonged facial allodynia, neurological deficits, and CNS neuroinflammation than a single mild TBI. These findings illuminate SIS pathophysiology and underscore the critical need for protection post-concussion.
Barriers to neurosurgery for medical students: a national study focused on the intersectionality of gender and race
OBJECTIVE Despite 51.2% of medical school graduates being female, only 29.8% of neurosurgery residency applicants are female. Furthermore, only 12.6% of neurosurgery applicants identify as underrepresented in medicine (URM). Evaluating the entry barriers for female and URM students is crucial in promoting the equity and diversity of the neurosurgical workforce. The objective of this study was to evaluate barriers to neurosurgery for medical students while considering the interaction between gender and race. METHODS A Qualtrics survey was distributed widely to US medical students, assessing 14 factors of hesitancy toward neurosurgery. Likert scale responses, representing statement agreeability, converted to numeric values on a 7-point scale were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test and ANOVA comparisons with Bonferroni correction. RESULTS Of 540 respondents, 68.7% were female and 22.6% were URM. There were 22.6% male non-URM, 7.4% male URM, 53.5% female non-URM, and 15.2% female URM respondents. The predominant reasons for hesitancy toward neurosurgery included work/life integration, length of training, competitiveness of residency position, and perceived malignancy of the field. Females were more hesitant toward neurosurgery due to maternity/paternity needs (p = 0.005), the absence of seeing people like them in the field (p < 0.001), and opportunities to pursue health equity work (p < 0.001). Females were more likely to have difficulties finding a mentor in neurosurgery who represented their identities (p = 0.017). URM students were more hesitant toward neurosurgery due to not seeing people like them in the field (p < 0.001). Subanalysis revealed that when students were stratified by both gender and URM status, there were more reasons for hesitancy toward neurosurgery that had significant differences between groups (male URM, male non-URM, female URM, and female non-URM students), suggesting the importance of intersectionality in this analysis. CONCLUSIONS The authors highlight the implications of gender and racial diversity in the neurosurgical workforce on medical student interest and recruitment. Their findings suggest the importance of actively working to address these barriers, including 1) maternity/paternity policy reevaluation, standardization, and dissemination; and 2) actively providing resources for the creation of mentorship relationships for both women and URM students in an effort to create a workforce that aligns with the changing demographics of medical graduates to continue to improve diversity in neurosurgery.