Chen, Laura P.

Professionalism is a core competency of gross anatomy and general medical school curricula requiring students to develop the skills of giving and receiving peer feedback. Our study evaluated the effectiveness of delivering feedback in a group setting compared to delivering it individually. The first year class of Mayo medical students (n=50) enrolled in gross anatomy (in dissection teams of 3 or 4) completed weekly anonymous peer‐evaluations of their team regarding multiple aspects of professionalism (integrity, responsibility, compassion, and peer respect). Professionalism scores were calculated using the quantitative values from these surveys. Students were also asked to comment on strengths and areas for improvement for each student. At the mid‐point of the course, peer comments and professionalism scores were shared with students in debriefing sessions, either individually or as a team. Preliminary analysis of pre‐ and post‐intervention professionalism scores indicates that students receiving feedback in a group setting are more likely to demonstrate higher scores on subsequent evaluations. Our findings suggest that providing feedback to first‐year medical students in a group setting is more beneficial for group dynamics and may improve professional attitudes and behaviors. This work was supported by the Mayo Clinic Department of Anatomy. Grant Funding Source None

Gross anatomy courses often utilize teaching assistants (TAs) to serve a multifaceted purpose. Qualitative analysis of interviews with gross anatomy TAs reveals seven distinct roles: formal teaching during course lectures, informal teaching during dissection, prosecting a demonstration cadaver, orchestrating regular review sessions, coordinating formative feedback about academic progress and professionalism, tutoring struggling students outside of class time, and supporting students in crisis should the need arise. Analysis also finds that TAs did not anticipate the full scope of their duties prior to undertaking them, and felt particularly unprepared to address issues of student mental health. We report our findings and propose a model for proactively training TAs for their inherently complex role. This work was supported by the Mayo Clinic Department of Anatomy. Grant Funding Source Student/Postdoctoral Travel Award Student Award

Recent curricular redesign at Mayo Medical School integrated radiology into first‐year gross and developmental anatomy. The resulting six‐week (120 contact hours) Human Structure block teaches gross anatomy through dissection, radiologic imaging, and correlation with embryology. To further promote holistic physician‐development, refinement of the Human Structure course has been driven by the six core competencies of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME): patient care, medical knowledge, practice‐based learning, interpersonal skills, professionalism, and systems‐based practice. We report here more than 20 educational interventions built into the Human Structure block that may serve as a model for incorporating the ACGME core competencies into early medical education. The block emphasizes clinically oriented anatomy, invites self‐ and peer‐evaluation, provides daily formative feedback through an audience response system, and employs team‐based learning. The course curriculum includes didactic briefing sessions and roles for students as teachers, leaders, and collaborators. Third‐year medical students serve as teaching assistants, enhancing their own knowledge of anatomy, bettering their skills as medical educators, and facilitating group communication and critiques. This work was supported by the Mayo Clinic Department of Anatomy. Grant Funding Source None