Back to Authors

Chen, Y. Ann

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1468-3490

Mayo Clinic

Moffitt Cancer Center

Citations 28

Epithelial‐Mesenchymal Transition (EMT) Gene Variants and Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) Risk
Amankwah, Ernest K. , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Lawrenson, Kate , Chornokur, Ganna , Aben, Katja K.H. , Antonenkova, Natalia, Bruinsma, Fiona , Bean, Yukie T., Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bisogna, Maria, Bogdanova, Natalia , Brinton, Louise A. , Campbell, Ian , Chen, Zhihua , Chen, Y. Ann , Chang‐Claude, Jenny, Cunningham, Julie M. , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Despierre, Evelyn, Dicks, Ed , Dörk, Thilo , Easton, Douglas F. , Eccles, Diana M., Edwards, Robert P., Ekici, Arif B. , Fasching, Peter A. , Gao, Yu‐Tang , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Goodman, Marc T. , Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp , Hasmad, Hanis Nazihah, Hein, Alexander , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Hillemanns, Peter , Høgdall, Claus , Høgdall, Estrid , Hosono, Satoyo , Iversen, Edwin S., Jakubowska, Anna , Jensen, Allan , Ji, Bu‐Tian , Kellar, Melissa, Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Krakstad, Camilla , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D. , Lee, Alice W. , Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A. , Liang, Dong , Lim, Boon Kiong , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lu, Karen, Lubiński, Jan , Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Matsuo, Keitaro , McGuire, Valerie , McLaughlin, John R., McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B., Ness, Roberta B., Eilber, Ursula, Odunsi, Kunle , Olson, Sara H. , Orlow, Irene , Oršulić, Sandra , Weber, Rachel Palmieri , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pelttari, Liisa M. , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Pike, Malcolm C., Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H. , Runnebaum, Ingo B. , Rzepecka, Iwona K. , Salvesen, Helga B., Schernhammer, Eva , Schwaab, Ira, Shu, Xiao‐Ou, Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Sieh, Weiva , Song, Honglin , Southey, Melissa C. , Śpiewankiewicz, Beata, Sucheston‐Campbell, Lara, Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Terry, Kathryn L. , Thompson, Pamela J., Tangen, Ingvild L. , Tworoger, Shelley S. , Altena, Anne M. van , Vierkant, Robert A. , Vergote, Ignace , Walsh, Christine , Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Wentzensen, Nicolas, Whittemore, Alice S. , Wicklund, Kristine G. , Wu, Anna H. , Wu, Xifeng , Woo, Yin Ling , Zheng, Wei , Kelemen, Linda E. , group, Georgia Chenevix‐Trench on behalf of the AOCS management, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Ramus, Susan J. , Goode, Ellen L. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Gayther, Simon A. , Narod, Steven A., Sellers, Thomas A. , Phelan, Catherine M., Lu, Karen H. , Eccles, Diana , Lambrechts, Diether , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Dennis, Joe , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Bandera, Elisa V. , Bjørge, Line , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Bunker, Clareann H. , Bützow, Ralf C. , Carty, Karen , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Cybulski, Cezary , Bois, Andreas du , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Dürst, Matthias , Eccles, Diana M., Fridley, Brooke L. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Gronwald, Jacek , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Karlan, Beth Y. , Jim, Heather , Kjær, Susanne K. , Lu, Karen, McLaughlin, John R., Milne, Roger L. , Modugno, Francesmary , Nevanlinna, Heli , Paul, James , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Risch, Harvey A. , Rosen, Barry P. , Rudolph, Anja , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Thomsen, Lotte Nedergaard , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Ziogas, Argyrios , Berchuck, Andrew , group, Georgia Chenevix‐Trench on behalf of the AOCS management, Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Pelttari, L M , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Giles, Graham G , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , McNeish, Iain A , Ramus, Susan J , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Lawrenson, Kate , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Moysich, Kirsten , Orlow, Irene , Lissowska, Jolanta , Campbell, Ian G , Southey, Melissa C , Glasspool, Rosalind , Lin, Hui-Yi , Matsuo, Keitaro , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Zheng, Wei , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T

Genetic Epidemiology | September 24, 2015 | Volume: 39 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 689-697

10.1002/gepi.21921 Get It

ABSTRACTEpithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process whereby epithelial cells assume mesenchymal characteristics to facilitate cancer metastasis. However, EMT also contributes to the initiation and development of primary tumors. Prior studies that explored the hypothesis that EMT gene variants contribute to epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) risk have been based on small sample sizes and none have sought replication in an independent population. We screened 15,816 single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 296 genes in a discovery phase using data from a genome‐wide association study of EOC among women of European ancestry (1,947 cases and 2,009 controls) and identified 793 variants in 278 EMT‐related genes that were nominally (P < 0.05) associated with invasive EOC. These SNPs were then genotyped in a larger study of 14,525 invasive‐cancer patients and 23,447 controls. A P‐value <0.05 and a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.2 were considered statistically significant. In the larger dataset, GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 was associated with the endometrioid subtype among Caucasians (odds ratio (OR) = 1.16, 95% CI = 1.07–1.25, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.19), whereas F8 rs7053448 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27–2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), F8 rs7058826 (OR = 1.69, 95% CI = 1.27–2.24, P = 0.0003, FDR = 0.12), and CAPN13 rs1983383 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.69–0.90, P = 0.0005, FDR = 0.12) were associated with combined invasive EOC among Asians. In silico functional analyses revealed that GPC6/GPC5 rs17702471 coincided with DNA regulatory elements. These results suggest that EMT gene variants do not appear to play a significant role in the susceptibility to EOC.
Abstract 4635: Inherited variants affecting RNA editing may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility
Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Reid, Brett M. , Chen, Zhihua , Gayther, Simon A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Iversen, Edwin S. , Pearce, Leigh, Phelan, Catherine, Rossing, Mary Anne, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Chen, Y. Ann , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Berchuck, Andrew , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Ramus, Susan J. , Rossing, Mary Anne

Cancer Research | August 5, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 15_Supplement | Pages: 4635-4635

10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-4635 Get It

Abstract Background: Recent bioinformatic analyses and high-throughput sequencing efforts have revealed that RNA editing is a widespread post-transcriptional modification that affects non-coding repetitive elements throughout the genome. This modification, which involves the conversion of adenosine into inosine, is mediated by the action of the adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) family of enzymes. Based on reports of dysfunctional ADAR expression in epithelial ovarian cancers (EOC), we hypothesized that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in five ADAR genes (ADAD1, ADAR1, ADAR2, ADAR3, SND1) may contribute to EOC susceptibility, potentially by altering the expression of corresponding genes in ovarian tissues. Methods: Using directly genotyped and imputed data from 10,891 invasive EOC cases and 21,693 healthy controls of European ancestry represented in the international Collaborative Oncological Gene-environment Study, we evaluated the frequency of 7,133 SNPs in 5 RNA editing genes. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) between genotypes and case status under a log-additive genetic model, with adjustment for the first five principal components representing European ancestry. Subgroup analysis was conducted for the four main histologic sub-types of EOC. We also aggregated SNP-level data and conducted gene-level analyses using the Admixture Maximum Likelihood (AML) test and the Sequence-Kernel Association test for the combined effect of common and rare variants (SKAT-CR). Results: Association analysis revealed a top risk-associated SNP (OR (95% CI) = 1.39 (1.17-1.64)) in ADAR3 with P = 1.3 x10−4, 17 additional SNPs in ADAR1, ADAR3, or SND1 with P = 10−4, and 51 SNPs with P = 10−3; this observed number of statistically-significant SNPs was greater than expected. When restricting to the 6,500 invasive serous adenocarcinomas, the magnitude of association strengthened for numerous SNPs. Exploratory analysis for the less common histologic subtypes (endometrioid (n = 1,439), mucinous (n = 696), and clear cell (n = 660)) revealed SNP-level associations (P&lt;10−3) unique to each sub-type. Gene-level analyses based on AML and SKAT-CR revealed that ADAR1 was globally associated (P&lt;0.10) with susceptibility to invasive EOC, with P = 0.024 and P = 0.023, respectively. Expression quantitative trait locus analysis is underway to evaluate associations between genotype and gene expression in EOC and precursor tissues using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas Project and other sources. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this large-scale collaboration suggest that germline variation involving RNA editing genes may influence susceptibility to EOC. This novel finding warrants further investigation, as inherited and acquired alterations affecting RNA editing may serve as important biological mechanisms that promote the development of EOC and possibly other malignancies. Citation Format: Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Brett M. Reid, Y. Ann Chen, Hui-Yi Lin, Alvaro Monteiro, Zhihua Chen, Andrew Berchuck, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jennifer Doherty, Simon Gayther, Ellen Goode, Edwin Iversen, Leigh Pearce, Paul D. P. Pharoah, Catherine Phelan, Susan Ramus, Mary Anne Rossing, Joellen Schildkraut, Thomas Sellers, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Inherited variants affecting RNA editing may contribute to ovarian cancer susceptibility. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4635. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4635
Abstract 4634: Variants within super-enhancer regulatory elements associate with epithelial ovarian cancer risk
Reid, Brett M. , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Chen, Zhihua , Gayther, Simon A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Iversen, Edwin S. , Pearce, Leigh, Phelan, Catherine, Rossing, Mary Anne, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Chen, Y. Ann , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Berchuck, Andrew , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Ramus, Susan J.

Cancer Research | August 5, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 15_Supplement | Pages: 4634-4634

10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-4634 Get It

Abstract Background: Cell-type-specific super enhancers, or large clusters of mediator-rich enhancers, are highly transcribed regions of the genome with key functions in the maintenance of cell identity and control. These regulatory elements are easily perturbed and enriched for disease-associated sequence variation. Identification of disease-associated super-enhancers and investigation of their sequence variants may help identify important, biologically relevant associations previously overlooked by genome-wide studies. Thus, we sought to identify variants within ovarian tissue specific super-enhancers and investigate their association with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) susceptibility. Methods: We utilized genotype data from a European population of ∼11,000 invasive EOC cases and 22,000 healthy controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. A public catalog of 478 super-enhancers, identified by peak histone H3K27ac ChIP-seq signal in ovarian tissue, was used to identify 72,116 variants located within 344 super-enhancer regions. Unconditional logistic regression (log-additive model) was used to assess individual SNP-EOC risk associations. Additionally, we reviewed associations within 500 kb of super-enhancer regions to identify proximal associated variants. When LD structure indicated, we employed conditional analysis to determine independence of the super-enhancer signal. Gene-EOC risk associations were assessed with the Admixture Maximum Likelihood (AML) test and Sequence-Kernel Association Test (SKAT) for the combined effect of common and rare (MAF&lt;0.01) variants. Models were adjusted for population stratification using the first five principal components. To adjust for multiple comparisons, a false discovery rate of 10% was used. Results: The most significant SNP observed was rs147487657 (p = 7.7×10−6) on locus 2q37.3 in the HDAC4 gene and there were an additional 12 SNPs with p&lt;1.0×10−4, although not significant at 10% FDR. Gene-level analyses identified two super-enhancers significantly associated with EOC risk. An enhancer at the previously reported 2q31 locus, containing HOXD8 and HOXD-AS2, associated (SKAT p = 4.3×10−5; AML p&lt;0.001) with the top SNP located within the 5′UTR of HOXD8 transcription factor (rs847163 (T&gt;C); p&lt;2.08×10−5). Conditional analysis did not identify an independent association within the super-enhancer region. The second EOC-associated super-enhancer identified was at locus 1q32 (SKAT p = 0.00052, AML p = 0.001) containing the CSRP1 gene. There were 6 SNPs with p&lt;0.001 and 16 SNPs with p&lt;0.01, all were inversely associated with risk and consistent with the top hit at rs927901 T&gt;C (OR = 0.94; 95% CI: 0.90-0.97; p = 2.1×10−4). Associations varied by histologic subtype, possibly due to variance in disease relevant super-enhancer cell-type.Conclusion: These findings suggest germline variation within super-enhancer regions may contribute to EOC susceptibility Citation Format: Brett M. Reid, Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Y. Ann Chen, Hui-Yi Lin, Alvaro Monteiro, Zhihua Chen, Andrew Berchuck, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jennifer Doherty, Simon Gayther, Ellen L. Goode, Edwin Iversen, Leigh Pearce, Paul Pharoah, Catherine Phelan, Susan Ramus, Mary Anne Rossing, Joellen Schildkraut, Thomas Sellers, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Variants within super-enhancer regulatory elements associate with epithelial ovarian cancer risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4634. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4634
Abstract 4633: Evidence that long non-coding RNA variants associate with epithelial ovarian cancer risk
Sellers, Thomas A. , Reid, Brett M. , Richards, Edward J., Teer, Jamie K. , Chen, Zhihua , Goode, Ellen L. , Iverson, Edwin S., Pearce, Leigh, Phelan, Catherine, Rossing, Mary Anne, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Cheng, Jin Q. , Gayther, Simon A. , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Chen, Y. Ann , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Berchuck, Andrew , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Ramus, Susan J.

Cancer Research | August 5, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 15_Supplement | Pages: 4633-4633

10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-4633 Get It

Abstract Background: Genome wide association studies (GWAS) have identified 20 loci associated with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. Additional EOC risk loci await identification, and biological approaches may represent a useful strategy for overcoming sample size limitations. The ENCODE project recently concluded that only ∼1.2% of the genome encodes proteins, but at least 20% exhibits biological function and over 80% exhibits biochemical indices of function. Post-GWAS follow-up studies have firmly established that some associations are due to inter-individual differences in non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). To estimate the magnitude of impact of variants in long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), we assessed enrichment of EOC-associated SNPs in lncRNA regions by comparing the density of EOC-associated loci between lncRNA regions, non-lncRNA regions, and the whole genome. Methods: The study population included ∼18,000 invasive EOC cases and 34,000 healthy controls of European ancestry from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium with GWAS data imputed to 1000 Genomes Project (1KGP) density. Density was compared with two measures: average chromosome length required for one EOC-associated SNP (kb/locus) and average number of tested SNPs containing one EOC-associated SNP (SNPs/locus). Coordinates and annotation for 13,870 lncRNA genes were downloaded from the publicly available GENCODE (v19) database and were used to annotate SNPs from the 1KGP imputed GWAS data, yielding 13,192 lncRNA genes with biallelic variants imputed at rsquare ≥0.25. A SNP was considered EOC-associated if it reached a significance level of P&lt;10−5. Results: Genome-wide, 11.6% of the 15,123,646 tested SNPs fell within lncRNA regions. Of 5,294 EOC-associated SNPs that were identified, 27.7% were located within lncRNAs, a higher frequency than expected (&lt;v:shape style = “WIDTH: 16.5pt; HEIGHT: 18pt” id = _x0000_i1026 equationxml = ‘14pχ2′ type = “#_x0000_t75”&gt; = 9.35×10−22). Additionally, EOC-associated SNPs were located on average every 237.6 kb (or 1204 tested SNPs) in lncRNA regions versus every 657.7 kb (or 3489 SNPS) in non-lncRNA regions and every 541.5 kb (or 2857 SNPs) in the whole genome, clearly demonstrating an enrichment of EOC-associated loci in lncRNA regions. A total of 1,464 lncRNA SNPs from 53 unique lncRNAs associated with EOC risk (P&lt;10−5); 70 of the identified lncRNA SNPs had P-values between 10−20 and 10−32, and 221 had P-values between 10−10 and 10−15, representing 21 unique regions &gt; 500kb apart. Conclusions: These results justify efforts to integrate functional and population level genetic data on lncRNA regions to explore a new paradigm that addresses the problem of the missing heritability for cancer where restrictions in sample size and statistical power limit the ability to discover additional risk loci. Citation Format: Thomas A. Sellers, Brett M. Reid, Y. Ann Chen, Hui-Yi Lin, Edward Richards, Jamie Teer, Alvaro Monteiro, Zhihua Chen, Andrew Berchuck, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jennifer Doherty, Ellen Goode, Edwin Iverson, Leigh Pearce, Paul Pharoah, Catherine Phelan, Susan Ramus, Mary Anne Rossing, Joellen Schildkraut, Jin Cheng, Simon Gayther, Jennifer Permuth-Wey, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Evidence that long non-coding RNA variants associate with epithelial ovarian cancer risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4633. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4633
Abstract 4636: Investigation of exome variants associated with overall survival in ovarian cancer
Permuth‐Wey, Jenny, Sellers, Thomas A. , Pirie, Ailith, Goode, Ellen L. , Winham, Stacey J. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Larson, Melissa C. , Fogarty, Zachary C. , Berchuck, Andrew , Chen, Y. Ann , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia

Cancer Research | August 4, 2015 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 15_Supplement | Pages: 4636-4636

10.1158/1538-7445.am2015-4636 Get It

Abstract Many germline genetic variants have been found to be associated with susceptibility to epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), but currently few associations have been identified for EOC outcomes such as overall survival. In the absence of evidence for common germline markers, it is possible that rare variants not captured in GWAS arrays may be associated with overall survival. We hypothesize that rare variants, either individually or combined across a gene, may be associated with overall survival in EOC. We utilized data from two genotyping projects of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC) that used commercial exome-based arrays. The primary sample, genotyped on the Affymetrix Axiom Exome Array at 227,892 standard and custom variants, consisted of 14 independent EOC studies (4293 cases; 2257 deaths). The secondary sample, genotyped on the Illumina Infinium HumanExome BeadChip at 114,620 variants, consisted of six additional EOC studies (1744 cases; 1027 deaths). Both sets were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards regression to determine the association of each variant with overall survival time. Meta-analysis was conducted across samples at 73,203 overlapping variants. Gene-level tests of over 18,000 genes were also conducted using burden tests and Sequencing Kernel Association Tests (SKAT) adapted for Cox proportional hazards models. Gene-level tests were conducted separately for the primary and secondary cases and then were meta-analyzed. Models were adjusted for age, site, and three principle components. Six individual variants had meta-analysis p-values &lt; 1.0E-4, five of which were rare (MAF &lt; 0.003). Common variant rs8170 (MAF = 0.2) in BABAM1 encoding BRISC and BRCA1 A complex member 1 - previously reported to be associated with EOC risk_showed evidence of association with overall survival (Pmeta = 1.5E-5) and consistent estimates of effect size across both samples (HR1 = 1.18, HR2 = 1.19). In imputed genotype data from over 18,000 subjects from OCAC genotyped on the COGS array, this association reaches genome-wide significance (HR = 1.15, P = 4.7E-9). Five genes had gene-level meta-analysis p-values &lt; 1.0E-4, including top ranked ATG2B (p = 1.1E-6), an autophagy gene important for apoptosis; zinc finger protein PEG3 (p = 1.8E-5), playing a role in autophagy and down-regulated in EOC; helicase-like transcription factor HLTF (p = 1.9E-5), involved in post-replication DNA repair; mitochondrial fission regulator 1-like gene FAM54B (p = 3.1E-5); and T-cell surface glycoprotein CD1E (p = 8.8E-5). With over 6000 EOC cases in the primary and secondary samples, this is the largest genome-wide assessment of rare variant genetic associations with EOC overall survival. Variant rs8170 in BABAM1, a necessary component of the BRCA1 complex, is associated with overall survival. Single variant and gene-level analyses provide complementary approaches, suggesting additional candidates that warrant follow-up study. Citation Format: Stacey J. Winham, Brooke L. Fridley, Melissa C. Larson, Zachary Fogarty, Andrew Berchuck, Yian Ann Chen, Hui-Yi Lin, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jenny Permuth-Wey, Thomas A. Sellers, Ailith Pirie, Ellen L. Goode, Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Investigation of exome variants associated with overall survival in ovarian cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 4636. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-4636
Network-Based Integration of GWAS and Gene Expression Identifies a HOX -Centric Network Associated with Serous Ovarian Cancer Risk
Kar, Siddhartha , Lawrenson, Kate , Aben, Katja K.H. , Antonenkova, Natalia, Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Study, on behalf of the Australian Cancer, Group, and on behalf of the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Baker, Helen , Bean, Yukie T., Beckmann, Matthias W. , Bisogna, Maria, Bogdanova, Natalia , Brinton, Louise A. , Campbell, Ian , Carty, Karen , Chang‐Claude, Jenny , Chen, Y. Ann , Chen, Zhihua , Cunningham, Julie M. , Dansonka‐Mieszkowska, Agnieszka , Dicks, Ed , Dörk, Thilo , Eccles, Diana , Easton, Douglas F. , Edwards, Robert P., Ekici, Arif B. , Fasching, Peter A. , Gao, Yu‐Tang , Giles, Graham G. , Glasspool, Rosalind , Goode, Ellen L. , Goodman, Marc T. , Grownwald, Jacek, Harrington, Patricia, Harter, Philipp , Hein, Alexander , Heitz, Florian , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T., Hillemanns, Peter , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus , Hosono, Satoyo , Iversen, Edwin S., Jakubowska, Anna , Jensen, Allan , Ji, Bu‐Tian , Kjær, Susanne K. , Kelemen, Linda E. , Kellar, Melissa, Kelley, Joseph L., Kiemeney, Lambertus A. , Krakstad, Camilla , Kupryjańczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Lambrechts, Sandrina, Le, Nhu D. , Lee, Alice W. , Lele, Shashi, Leminen, Arto, Lester, Jenny, Levine, Douglas A. , Liang, Dong , Lissowska, Jolanta , Lu, Karen, Lubiński, Jan , Lundvall, Lene, Massuger, Leon F.A.G. , Matsuo, Keitaro , McGuire, Valerie , McLaughlin, John R., McNeish, Iain A. , Menon, Usha , Moysich, Kirsten B., Narod, Steven A., Nedergaard, Lotte , Ness, Roberta B., Odunsi, Kunle , Olson, Sara H. , Orlow, Irene , Oršulić, Sandra , Weber, Rachel Palmieri , Pearce, Celeste Leigh, Pelttari, Liisa M. , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Phelan, Catherine M., Pike, Malcolm C., Ramus, Susan J. , Rossing, Mary Anne, Rothstein, Joseph H. , Runnebaum, Ingo B. , Rzepecka, Iwona K. , Salvesen, Helga B., Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Schwaab, Ira, Shvetsov, Yurii B. , Sieh, Weiva , Song, Honglin , Southey, Melissa C. , Sucheston‐Campbell, Lara, Tangen, Ingvild L. , Teo, Soo‐Hwang , Terry, Kathryn L. , Thompson, Pamela J., Timorek, Agnieszka, Tworoger, Shelley S. , Altena, Anne M. van , Nieuwenhuysen, Els Van , Vergote, Ignace , Vierkant, Robert A. , Wang‐Gohrke, Shan , Walsh, Christine , Wentzensen, Nicolas, Whittemore, Alice S. , Wicklund, Kristine G. , Woo, Yin Ling , Wu, Xifeng , Wu, Anna H. , Zheng, Wei , Sellers, Thomas A. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Freedman, Matthew L., Gayther, Simon A. , Lu, Karen H. , Lambrechts, Diether , Tyrer, Jonathan P. , Li, Qiyuan , Anton‐Culver, Hoda , Study, on behalf of the Australian Cancer, Group, and on behalf of the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, Bandera, Elisa V. , Berchuck, Andrew , Bjørge, Line , Brooks‐Wilson, Angela , Bützow, Ralf C. , Cook, Linda S. , Cramer, Daniel W. , Cybulski, Cezary , Dennis, Joe , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Bois, Andreas du , Dürst, Matthias , Fridley, Brooke L. , Gentry‐Maharaj, Aleksandra , Hildebrandt, Michelle A.T. , Paul, James , Karlan, Beth Y. , Lu, Karen, McLaughlin, John R., Modugno, Francesmary , Nevanlinna, Heli , Pejovic, Tanja B. , Poole, Elizabeth M. , Risch, Harvey A. , Rosen, Barry P. , Rudolph, Anja , Shu, Xiao‐Ou , Siddiqui, Nadeem , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Wilkens, Lynne R. , Yang, Hannah , Ziogas, Argyrios , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Pelttari, L M , Dörk, Thilo , Lambrechts, Diether , Giles, Graham G , Kiemeney, Lambertus A , Kjaer, Susanne K , McNeish, Iain A , Ramus, Susan J , Teo, Soo H , Tworoger, Shelley S , Hein, Alexander , Hillemanns, Peter , Jensen, Allan , Vierkant, Robert A , Eccles, Diana , Menon, Usha , Lawrenson, Kate , Monteiro, Alvaro N , Moysich, Kirsten , Orlow, Irene , Lissowska, Jolanta , Campbell, Ian G , Southey, Melissa C , Glasspool, Rosalind , Matsuo, Keitaro , Heitz, Florian , Jakubowska, Anna , Kupryjanczyk, Jolanta , Lambrechts, Diether , Sieh, Weiva , Ekici, Arif B , Bogdanova, Natalia V , Chenevix-Trench, Georgia , Zheng, Wei , Høgdall, Estrid , Høgdall, Claus K , Kar, Siddhartha , Lubinski, Jan , Goodman, Marc T

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | July 24, 2015 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 10 | Pages: 1574-1584

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-14-1270 Get It

Abstract Background: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have so far reported 12 loci associated with serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. We hypothesized that some of these loci function through nearby transcription factor (TF) genes and that putative target genes of these TFs as identified by coexpression may also be enriched for additional EOC risk associations. Methods: We selected TF genes within 1 Mb of the top signal at the 12 genome-wide significant risk loci. Mutual information, a form of correlation, was used to build networks of genes strongly coexpressed with each selected TF gene in the unified microarray dataset of 489 serous EOC tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Genes represented in this dataset were subsequently ranked using a gene-level test based on results for germline SNPs from a serous EOC GWAS meta-analysis (2,196 cases/4,396 controls). Results: Gene set enrichment analysis identified six networks centered on TF genes (HOXB2, HOXB5, HOXB6, HOXB7 at 17q21.32 and HOXD1, HOXD3 at 2q31) that were significantly enriched for genes from the risk-associated end of the ranked list (P &lt; 0.05 and FDR &lt; 0.05). These results were replicated (P &lt; 0.05) using an independent association study (7,035 cases/21,693 controls). Genes underlying enrichment in the six networks were pooled into a combined network. Conclusion: We identified a HOX-centric network associated with serous EOC risk containing several genes with known or emerging roles in serous EOC development. Impact: Network analysis integrating large, context-specific datasets has the potential to offer mechanistic insights into cancer susceptibility and prioritize genes for experimental characterization. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 24(10); 1574–84. ©2015 AACR.
Abstract 946: Exome genotyping array identifies rare and low-frequency variants that may be associated with ovarian cancer risk
Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Chen, Zhihua , Gayther, Simon A. , Goode, Ellen L. , Iversen, Edwin S. , Pearce, Leigh, Phelan, Catherine M., Pirie, Ailith, Rossing, Mary Ann, Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Chen, Y. Ann , Berchuck, Andrew , Chenevix‐Trench, Georgia , Doherty, Jennifer A. , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Ramus, Susan J. , Rossing, Mary Anne

Cancer Research | May 4, 2015 | Volume: 74 | Issue: 19_Supplement | Pages: 946-946

10.1158/1538-7445.am2014-946 Get It

Abstract Background: Common genetic variants identified by genome-wide association studies and follow-up genotyping initiatives only explain a small proportion of the heritability of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We hypothesized that some of the missing heritability may be explained by rare (minor allele frequency (MAF) &lt;0.5%) and low-frequency (MAF 0.5-5%) protein-coding variants that are not well captured by genotyping arrays that focus on common variants. Methods: To examine the association between uncommon variants and EOC susceptibility, we genotyped 7,060 EOC cases and 6,712 controls from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium using the Affymetrix Axiom Exome Genotyping Array. This platform contains 300,785 putative functional coding variants selected from exome sequences of 12,000+ individuals representing multiple ethnicities and complex traits. After performing quality control (QC), we used unconditional logistic regression treating the number of minor alleles carried as an ordinal variable (log-additive model) to evaluate SNP-EOC risk associations. Genotype cluster plots were visually inspected for top-ranking variants to determine assay success, and allele frequencies of samples from the 1000 Genomes Project and other cohorts were evaluated for QC purposes. Results: A total of 13,318 samples (97%) passed QC, and 12,779 eligible samples (6,293 invasive serous and endometrioid cases and 6,486 controls) were included in the analyses. 280,737 (93%) of the 300,785 attempted markers were successfully genotyped and had call rates &gt;90%. After removing 31,436 monomorphic markers, the 249,301 remaining markers were included in association analyses. We confirmed variants at previously reported EOC susceptibility loci (9p22, 3q25, 17cen-q21.3, and 8q24), with p-values between 10-5 and 10-11. Several correlated low-frequency non-synonymous variants (MAF=5%) residing in a novel EOC susceptibility gene at 3q25.31 were risk-associated. The most significant variant at 3q25.31 had an OR=1.36 and p = 5.58x10-8. Also noteworthy is a rare variant at 15q15.1-q21.1 (MAF=0.5%) that introduces a stop codon in a gene belonging to the tyrosine kinase family (OR=0.39, CI=0.26-0.58, p = 4.52x10-6). We also identified a more common synonymous coding variant in a phosphatase at 6q21.3 that was associated with increased risk (OR=1.22, CI=1.13-1.33, p = 1.84x10-6, MAF=9.6%). Population stratification and gene-based analyses are underway to further examine the impact of the newly-identified variants on EOC risk. A meta-analysis to include data from an additional 2104 EOC cases and 2516 controls genotyped with Illumina's HumanExome Beadchip rare variant array is also underway. Functional analysis of the most promising variants will follow. Conclusions: Preliminary data from this large-scale study reveals novel rare and low-frequency variants that may influence susceptibility to epithelial ovarian cancer. Citation Format: Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Y. Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Andrew Berchuck, Georgia Chenevix-Trench, Jennifer Doherty, Simon Gayther, Ellen L. Goode, Edwin Iversen, Alvaro N.A. Monteiro, Leigh Pearce, Paul D.P. Pharoah, Catherine M. Phelan, Ailith Pirie, Susan Ramus, Mary Ann Rossing, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Thomas A. Sellers, on behalf of the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium. Exome genotyping array identifies rare and low-frequency variants that may be associated with ovarian cancer risk. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 946. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-946
Abstract 4839: SNP-SNP interactions in mitochondria-related pathways are associated with invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) risk .
Chen, Zhihua , Qu, Xiaotao , Goode, Ellen L. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Iversen, Edwin S., Narod, Steven A. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Phelan, Catherine M., Lin, Hui‐Yi , Tsai, Ya-Yu , Chen, Y. Ann

Cancer Research | August 14, 2014 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 4839-4839

10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-4839 Get It

Abstract Background: Variation in mitochondrial genes in cancer cells alters the mitochondrial bioenergetic and biosynthetic state, which mediates cross-talk between mitochondria and the nucleus to modulate many cellular processes. The objective of this study was to comprehensively evaluate mitochondria-nuclear cross-talk in terms of SNP-SNP interactions associated with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk, which may play an important role in unveiling the underlying mechanism of this complex lethal disease. Methods: Our analyses were based on 1,938 invasive EOC cases and 2,009 controls with greater than 80% European ancestry from five case-control studies genotyped using the Illumina 610quad chip. We evaluated 2,488 SNPs in over 1,500 genes in eight mitochondria-related pathways (apoptosis, oxidation-reduction, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, immunomoduation, transmembrane transport, small GTPases, BRCA1-interactors and circadian rhythm). SNPs with strong linkage disequilibrium of r2 &gt; 0.8 were excluded. We examined 2-way SNP-SNP interactions associated with invasive EOC risk using the two-stage Random Forests plus Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (TRM) approach. Bootstrapping was further performed to select important variables and reduce false positive findings. Based on the scree plot using 1,000 bootstrap samples, the factors with more than 4% of bootstrap frequency were defined as significant factors. We then included each identified factors separately in model adjusting for study site and first principal component representing European ancestry. Results: Five significant SNP-SNP interactions were observed: (rs2270799 in IQSEC3 (12p13.33) + rs933305 in CUX2 (12q24.3), (p= 6.3x10−5); rs6063251 in PREX1 (20q13.3) + rs9705 in SLC39A8 (4q22-q24), (p= 3.5x10−5); rs933305 in CUX2 (12q24.3) + rs1712957 in ARHGAP15 (2q22.2-q22.3), (p=4.2x10−7), rs2861828 in SLIT1 (10q23.3-q24) + rs6063251 in PREX1 (20q13.3), (p=2.5x10−7); rs10954593 in SEMA3C (7q21-q31) + rs933305 in CUX2 (12q24.3), (p=2.8x10−3). Four of the five interactions involved SNPs from genes in the small GTPases pathway (IQSEC3; PREX1 (twice) and ARHGAP15). In addition, three of the five interaction pairs involved the CUX2 gene. This gene encodes a protein which contains three CUT domains and a homeodomain, which are DNA-binding motifs. The main mitochondrial SNP-SNP interaction involved the nuclear mitochondria gene SLC39A8. Conclusions: Our results suggest that genetic variation in mitochondrial-related pathways may be associated with invasive EOC risk. These findings highlight important genes/pathways that may interact as a network to influence invasive EOC risk and may generate novel therapeutic targets. External validation will be done using other independent studies for future analyses. Citation Format: Hui-Yi Lin, Ya-Yu Tsai, Y. Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Xiaotao Qu, Ellen L. Goode, Joellen Schildkraut, Edwin Iversen, Steven A. Narod, Thomas A. Sellers, Catherine M. Phelan. SNP-SNP interactions in mitochondria-related pathways are associated with invasive Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (EOC) risk . [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4839. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4839
Abstract 4579: Variants in long non-coding RNAs are associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk in a pooled analysis of three genome-wide association studies.
Chen, Zhihua , Permuth‐Wey, Jennifer, Qu, Xiaotao , Lawrenson, Kate , Fenstermacher, David, Phelan, Catherine M., Gayther, Simon A. , Narod, Steven A., Sutphen, Rebecca , Birrer, Michael J. , Wentzensen, Nicolas , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Goode, Ellen L. , Sellers, Thomas A. , Chen, Y. Ann , Tsai, Ya-Yu , Lin, Hui‐Yi , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Pharoah, Paul D.P. , Lawrenson, Kate

Cancer Research | August 14, 2014 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 4579-4579

10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-4579 Get It

Abstract Since most GWAS hits fall in non-coding regions of the genome and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging as drivers of carcinogenesis, we hypothesized that SNPs in lncRNAs influence epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk. A comprehensive lncRNA database (lncRNA db) that contained 104 human lncRNAs when downloaded in November 2011 was used to identify 1,737 variants in 63 unique lncRNAs that were represented in three genome-wide association studies from North America, the United Kingdom, and Poland (3,995 EOC cases and 3,277 controls of European background). SNPs with MAF &lt;5% were excluded, and missing genotypes were inferred with Mach using the HapMap CEU population. Unconditional logistic regression treating alternate alleles as an ordinal variable was used to evaluate individual SNP-EOC risk associations. Subgroup analysis was conducted for serous adenocarcinomas (N= 2,066), the main histologic subtype of EOC. Models were adjusted for study and European ancestry using the first two principal components (PCs). We reduced correlated signals (r2 ≥ 0.8) within each lncRNA and kept the most statistically significant variants based on Wald tests, resulting in 651 SNPs for further analyses. Fisher's product method was used to aggregate evidence of multiple variants within each lncRNA using 10,000 permutations. To adjust for multiple comparisons, a false discovery rate (FDR) of 10% was used. A replication phase was carried out for top-ranked SNPs from an additional 9,854 EOC cases (5,802 serous) and 17,633 controls genotyped through an international effort known as the Collaborative Oncological Gene-Environment study (COGS). Four lncRNAs, WT1-AS (p = 0.005, n = 2 SNPs), Hoxa11as (p = 0.013, n = 2), AK082072 (p = 0.016, n = 4) and H19 (p = 0.020, n = 2), were significantly associated with EOC risk among all histologies (FDR ≤ 10%). The SNP in WT1-AS most significantly associated with EOC risk was rs3809061 (T&gt;C) (minor allele frequency= 36%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.91, CI: 0.84-0.97, p = 0.008). Among serous cases, rs3809061 was also protective (OR = 0.92, p = 0.04). These findings were replicated by a correlated SNP rs2301250 (r2 = 0.84) evaluated in COGS among serous cases (OR = 0.94, CI: 0.90-0.99, p = 0.009) and less significant among all histologies (OR = 0.96, CI: 0.93-1.00, p = 0.054). We further interrogated its functional role by performing an expression quantitative trait locus analysis on WTI-AS mRNA expression using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data (N = 462 serous cases). WT1-AS expression was significantly higher among carriers of the variant allele (compared to TT homozygotes) using the Mann-Whitney U test (p = 0.001). WT1-AS is the antisense and possible regulator of WT1, a tumor suppressor gene reported to be prognostic in advanced EOC. These findings implicate germline lncRNA variants associated with EOC risk that merit further investigation. Citation Format: Yian Ann Chen, Zhihua Chen, Jennifer Permuth-Wey, Ya-Yu Tsai, Hui-Yi Lin, Xiaotao Qu, Kate Lawrenson, David Fenstermacher, Catherine M. Phelan, Alvaro Monteiro, Simon A. Gayther, Steven A. Narod, Rebecca Sutphen, Michael J. Birrer, Nicolas Wentzensen, Joellen M. Schildkraut, Ellen L. Goode, Paul Pharoah, Thomas Sellers. Variants in long non-coding RNAs are associated with epithelial ovarian cancer risk in a pooled analysis of three genome-wide association studies. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4579. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4579
Abstract 1649: Genome-wide association study of copy number variations in serous epithelial ovarian cancer susceptibility
Phelan, Catherine M., Iversen, Edwin S. , Chen, Zhihua , Permuth‐Wey, Jenny, Cunningham, Julie M. , August, Avery , Sutphen, Rebecca , Narod, Steven A. , Schildkraut, Joellen M. , Goode, Ellen L. , Fenstermacher, David, Sellers, Thomas A. , Tsai, Ya-Yu , Monteiro, Álvaro N.A. , Fridley, Brooke L. , Chen, Y. Ann , Jim, Heather , Vierkant, Robert A. , Barnholtz‐Sloan, Jill S. , Risch, Harvey A.

Cancer Research | August 13, 2012 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 8_Supplement | Pages: 1649-1649

10.1158/1538-7445.am2012-1649 Get It

Abstract DNA copy number variations (CNVs) are a significant and ubiquitous source of human genetic variation. However, the influence of CNVs on cancer susceptibility remains poorly understood. Out of 83 genome-wide association studies (GWAS) on cancer to date, only a few studies found significant associations on germline CNVs and cancer. Here we analyzed data from our ongoing two-stage GWAS of four North American case-control studies to test the hypothesis that CNVs in germline DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes may serve as risk factors for epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). To reduce disease heterogeneity, we focused on the subset of cases with serous histology. The analysis was therefore based on 942 serous ovarian cancer patients and 1,682 healthy controls who were genotyped using the Illumina 610K quad array. Subjects with extreme noise and genomic waviness in log R ratio (LR) were excluded prior to segmentation; principal component analysis was performed to adjust for batch effects. CNV segmentation was performed on LR data from 22 autosomes using circular binary segmentation embedded in the Copy Number Analysis Module from Golden Helix SNP Variation Suite version 7. Copy number segment covariates were discretized based on the thresholds that signify a transition between copy number states (deletion/no deletion; duplication/no duplication) after the segmentation. Unconditional logistic regression on a log-additive model was used to evaluate the association between copy number states and serous EOC risk after adjusting for study sites. By comparing single marker copy number states at 388,958 SNPs on 22 autosomes, we observed a total of 134 SNPs significantly associated with risk of serous EOC with a p value below 10−6. Associations with deletion polymorphisms were observed on chromosomes 7, 8, 14, and 18 when controlling for false discovery rate at 1%; no duplication polymorphisms were significant. We observed a large deletion at chromosome 14 that occurred in 8.9% of cases but in only 3.9% of controls, with a p value of 5.59×10−8 (Odds Ratio (OR): 2.56, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.82-3.60). Another common deletion on chromosome 7 occurred in 8.8% of cases and only 4.3% of controls (p=3.83×10−6; OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.60-3.10). Two additional regions on chromosomes 8 and 18 with deletion events less than 5% were also identified. Women who harbored the deletion on chromosome 8 were at lower risk of developing serous ovarian cancer (p=4.83×10−8; OR: 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01-0.30). Women who carried the deletion on chromosome 18 had an increased risk for serous EOC (p=9.04×10−7; OR: 7.26, 95% CI: 2.94-17.97). Further validation of these four regions using independent data sets is currently underway. In summary, this is the largest reported genome-wide study of CNVs and serous EOC risk. These preliminary results suggested that germline CNVs may play an important role in ovarian cancer susceptibility. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1649. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-1649