Olaizola, Gustavo

Prehabilitation with Impella 5.5 offers hemodynamic support while allowing early mobilization, yet its overall effect on post-transplant recovery remains unclear. The aim was to assess recovery during Impella 5.5–supported prehabilitation and determine its association with early post-heart transplant outcomes, including a potential dose–response relationship with ambulatory activity. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of adults bridged to transplant with Impella 5.5 between April 1, 2022 and September 30, 2024. Daily walking distance, recorded by nursing staff, served as the intervention. Primary outcome was postoperative hospital length of stay (LOS); the secondary outcome was time to extubation. Fine–Gray competing-risk models, adjusted for age, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, and days of Impella support, assessed associations. Longitudinal recovery trajectories were analyzed with linear mixed-effects models incorporating restricted cubic splines. Among 82 eligible patients, 65 met the inclusion criteria. Patients who walked farther during Impella 5.5 support in the intensive care unit (ICU) had shorter hospital stays and were taken off the ventilator sooner after transplantation. The overall recovery peaked during the first 2–3 weeks of support, with smaller recovery thereafter, indicating that most functional recovery occurred early during prehabilitation.

Heart transplantation is a well-established treatment for end-stage heart failure, but many patients present in poor physical condition, complicating outcomes. The Impella 5.5 device, used in cardiogenic shock, may support pretransplant rehabilitation by stabilizing organ function and promoting functional improvement. This retrospective cohort study assessed the relationship between functional status, measured by standardized Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care Basic Mobility (AM-PAC) scores, and days alive outside the hospital within 30 days post-transplant (DAOH-30). Patients who received Impella 5.5 support before transplantation between January 2019 and October 2023 were included, excluding those without AM-PAC scores within 24 hours pretransplant. Among 65 patients, the median DAOH-30 was 15 days (interquartile range [IQR], 8–19). Higher pretransplant standardized AM-PAC scores correlate with increased DAOH-30 (adjusted coefficient 0.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.01–0.6; p = 0.04), as did AM-PAC score improvement during rehabilitation (adjusted coefficient 0.35; 95% CI = 0.01–0.6; p = 0.04). Extended rehabilitation was associated with greater functional gains. These findings suggest that better pretransplant functional status and rehabilitation-related improvements were associated with increased DAOH-30. The Impella 5.5 device facilitates rehabilitation and may enhance post-transplant outcomes. Further research should refine strategies to optimize rehabilitation and recovery in this high-risk population.

Background: The new Global definition of ARDS recently introduced a subgroup known as non-intubated ARDS. This study aimed to assess the risk of progression from noninvasive oxygen support to intubation and ARDS severity based on the S pO 2 /F IO 2 among non-intubated subjects with ARDS. Methods: This retrospective study included subjects with COVID-19 admitted to 7 hospitals (5 in the United States and 2 in Argentina) from January 2020–January 2023. Subjects meeting the new non-intubated ARDS definition (high-flow nasal cannula [HFNC] with an S pO 2 /F IO 2 ≤315 [with S pO 2 ≤97%] or a P aO 2 /F IO 2 ≤300 mm Hg while receiving ≥30 L/min O 2 via HFNC) were included. The study evaluated the proportion of subjects who progressed to intubation, severity levels using the S pO 2 /F IO 2 cutoff proposed in the new ARDS definition, and mortality. Results: Nine hundred sixty-five non-intubated subjects with ARDS were included, of whom 27% ( n = 262) progressed to meet the Berlin criteria within a median of 3 d (interquartile range 2–6). The overall mortality was 23% (95% CI 20–26) ( n = 225), and among subjects who progressed to the Berlin criteria, it was 37% (95% CI 31–43) ( n = 98). Additionally, the worst S pO 2 /F IO 2 within 1 d of ARDS diagnosis was correlated with mortality, with mortality rates of 26% (95% CI 23–30) ( n = 177) for subjects with S pO 2 /F IO 2 ≤148, 17% (95% CI 12–23) ( n = 38) for those with S pO 2 /F IO 2 between 149–234, and 16% (95% CI 8–28) ( n = 10) for subjects maintaining an S pO 2 /F IO 2 higher than 235 ( P < .001). Conclusions: The non-intubated ARDS criteria encompassed a broader spectrum of subjects with lower in-hospital mortality compared to the Berlin criteria. The S pO 2 /F IO 2 and ARDS severity cutoff proposed in the new Global ARDS definition were valuable predictors of in-hospital mortality in these subjects.