Dasalla, Melissa

Background: Owing to reduced bleeding risks, radial is favored over femoral for access site selection in patients referred for coronary angiography, with specific benefits in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. However, studies were often limited to patients without coronary artery bypass grafts (CABG), given the technical challenges of the radial approach in these patients. Methods: We evaluated patients with prior CABG undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) from 2015-2020 at our institution. We reviewed access site and bleeding outcomes as defined in the NCDR CathPCI registry. Additional outcomes included procedural duration, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, and clinical events. Results: Of the 1,546 patients studied, 280 (18%) patients had radial access while 1,266 (82%) patients had femoral access. Over the study time period, frequency of radial access for post CABG catheterization procedures increased from 0% in 2015 to 45% in 2020. There were no statistically significant differences in comorbidities, bleeding events, complications, or mortality between radial vs femoral (Table). Fluoroscopy time was higher for radial vs femoral (14.9 mins vs 13.3 mins, p=0.04). Conclusion: Over time, radial access choice in post CABG patients increased, without significant differences with respect to bleeding events or complications as compared to femoral, though at increased fluoroscopy times.