Barbarawi, Mahmoud

Introduction: Remote monitoring using implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) or cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D) can be used as an adjunctive diagnostic tool to traditional hospital and clinic visits to monitor the volume status of patients with heart failure (HF). Methods: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (inception through February 4th, 2021) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating ICDs/CRT-D remote monitoring versus standard of care in patients with HF. Of 642 articles retrieved after removing duplicate items, we included 11 RCTs encompassing 5,965 patients. Absolute risk difference (ARD) with 95% credible interval (CrI) was estimated. Pooled (posterior) risk difference was computed using Bayesian hierarchical methods, random effects model and weakly informative prior. Results: The ARD for mortality was centered at -0.01 (95%CrI: -0.03; 0.01, Tau: 0.02), with 82% probability of ARD of ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring with respect to control being less than 0. The ARD for cardiovascular mortality was centered at -0.03 (95%CrI: -0.11; 0.05, Tau: 0.10), with 84% probability of ARD of ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring with respect to control being less than 0. The ARD for HF admissions was centered at -0.00 (95%CrI: -0.07; 0.06, Tau: 0.08), with 57% probability of ARD of ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring with respect to control being less than 0 [Figure]. Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that ICD/CRT-D remote monitoring in patients with HF is associated with a higher probability of reduced all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality compared with standard care. However, ICD-CRT/D remote monitoring was associated with minimal probability of difference in HF hospitalizations.