Background/Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a widespread transition to online learning. Yet, it is unclear how this shift in learning format impacted school attendance in adolescents with chronic pain, a group that struggles with school absenteeism. This study compared school attendance and format (e.g., in-person, online) in patients with chronic pain attending an Intensive Interdisciplinary Pain Treatment Program (IIPT) before the pandemic to an age- and gender-matched sample of youth attending the program after the pandemic. Methods: Participants were 226 school aged adolescents (13–18 years; M age = 15.89, SD = 1.46) enrolled in an IIPT before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients admitted before March 2020 (pre-pandemic group; n = 113) were compared to an age- and gender-matched group of patients who were admitted to the IIPT from November 2021 to November 2023 (post-pandemic group = 113). Upon admission to the program, participants completed validated measures of internalizing symptoms and functional disability. They also completed structured questions related to pain and school history. Results: Significantly more patients in the post-pandemic group were attending school through online and home-schooling options (p < 0.01). Youth who attended the IIPT after the pandemic missed fewer school days (p < 0.05) than those who attended before the pandemic. The groups did not differ in functional disability or internalizing symptoms. However, participants in the post-pandemic group who attended online school missed more school days (p < 0.01) and experienced greater functional disability (p < 0.05) than those who attended in person. Conclusions: The findings highlight how the COVID-19 pandemic may lead to sustained changes in the way adolescents with chronic pain attend school, with implications for increased functional disability and school dropout among this vulnerable population.
1089 Using Community Engagement to Increase Utilization of Primary Care for Sleep Concerns in Communities of Color
Abstract Introduction Growing evidence suggests that there are sleep health disparities in the United States that disadvantage communities of color, and other socioeconomically marginalized groups in medical and mental health settings. Research in public policy indicates several points of intervention for increasing engagement with treatment services in communities of color at the primary care level, including individual beliefs about mental health/health issues, and perceptions of various points of treatment engagement, as well as community factors (e.g., neighbors and church; Davey & Watson, 2007). Accordingly, the current study implemented a community-level virtual intervention that targeted beliefs about sleep and perceptions of behavioral sleep treatment with the aim to increase willingness to engage with treatment at the primary care level. Methods We conducted 12 semi-structured qualitative focus groups with 35 individuals from communities of color about their awareness, perception of, and access to behavioral sleep treatment in healthcare settings. Transcripts were coded using the Rapid and Rigorous Qualitative Data Analysis method for themes relevant to the guiding question, 'What are people/persons of color experiences and perspectives of sleep, and specific areas of improvement to increase people/persons of color groups' utilization of behavioral sleep services?'. Results After a brief period of education (range = 15-20 minutes) about cognitive-behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBTi), participants perceived behavioral sleep treatment as a favorable option both over and in conjunction with pharmacological options. Medical mistrust was mentioned as the most significant barrier in each focus group, with participants highlighting that increased attention to collaborative care and comprehensive education about treatment options at the primary care level would be helpful for reducing mistrust. Pre- and post-group survey analysis indicated a significant increase in participants’ willingness to use primary care as an entry point to access/utilization of behavioral sleep treatment (pre-group willingness = 54.84%, post-group willingness = 91.42%, p<.001). Conclusion Findings suggest that intervention at the community level can be powerful for increasing the willingness of communities of color to engage in treatment at the primary care level. It is paramount that future research continues to examine ways to increase engagement with behavioral sleep treatment to help reduce sleep health disparities. Support (if any)