Hamza, Amina

Abstract Introduction Hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS) is an effective therapy for moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in patients intolerant of positive airway pressure. Comorbid insomnia (COMISA) is common and may shape their engagement. Despite reports of improved insomnia symptoms, real-world data suggest reduced adherence and increased support needs. This study evaluated the impact of COMISA on HGNS therapy patterns and outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 46 adults with OSA who underwent HGNS implantation at Mayo Clinic Rochester between July 2020 and August 2025. Patients were categorized as OSA alone or COMISA based on pre-implantation data, including documented insomnia diagnosis, insomnia severity index score ≥15, sleep initiation or maintenance complaints, hypnotic or melatonin use, participation in cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, or an insomnia care plan within one year prior to activation. We collected HGNS adherence metrics (30-day average nightly use, nightly pauses, percent nights used) at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months; non-visit HGNS-related clinical encounters at 6 and 12 months; and pre- and post-activation AHI from polysomnography or home sleep apnea testing. Longitudinal outcomes were analyzed using mixed-effects models with fixed effects for time and COMISA status and a random intercept for patient. Results The cohort was 54% male and 98% White, with median age 66 years and BMI 31 kg/m2 (24–34). Median pre-implant AHI was 27 (19–40), and 30 patients (65%) had COMISA. Median nightly HGNS use declined from 7.8 to 6.6 hours from 1 to 12 months; mixed-effects modeling confirmed significant decreases over time (p≤0.03). Median nightly therapy pauses increased from 0.1 to 0.5, and median non-visit clinical encounters increased cumulatively from 2.5 at 6 months to 3.0 by 12 months (both p≤0.01). Median AHI reduction was 18.5 (2–27) (p=0.047). There were no statistically significant differences between OSA-alone and COMISA groups in HGNS adherence trajectories, therapy pauses, support needs, or AHI improvement (all p>0.05). Conclusion Although HGNS use declined modestly over time, COMISA was not statistically associated with differences in adherence, clinical support needs, or treatment response. Directional trends suggest greater adaptation challenges among patients with COMISA, warranting evaluation in larger prospective studies. Support (if any)

Abstract Introduction Oral Appliance Therapy (OAT) is a management option for patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA). A reported drawback to OAT is symptoms relating to Temporomandibular Joint Disorder (TMD), including post-procedure jaw pain. Some studies reported TMD in over 50% of patients prior to OAT. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of TMD and oral Parafunction Habits (PFH) in patients with OSA referred for OAT, and determine any relationship between patient characteristics, demographics, medical history, and degree of OAT advancement with post-procedure jaw pain. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted, reviewing the electronic health records of 125 patients with OSA referred to the division of dental sleep medicine in Mayo Clinic Rochester, for OAT. Records reviewed included patient demographics, TMD-PFH symptoms and signs before and after initiation of OAT, self-reported history of, and signs of PFH, AHI pre-initiation of OAT, presence of fibromyalgia, SSRI use, and percent advancement of appliance at time of re-evaluation. Results The median age of patients reviewed was 58 (Interquartile Range (IQR) 20), median BMI 30.5 (IQR 7), median AHI 11.3 (IQR 9.5). 57% were male, 43% female. 20.8% patients had TMD history, 37.6% had TMD signs, 47.2% had PFH history (jaw clenching, lip biting, and/or thumb sucking). 96% had signs of PFH. 15.2% reported post-procedure jaw pain. There was a statistically significant relationship between both TMD history and TMD signs, with post-procedure jaw pain (p value 0.002 and 0.013 respectively), although after multi-variate analysis, only TMD history remained associated with post-procedure jaw pain (Odd’s Ratio 3.385, 95% Confidence Interval 1.081 – 10.601, p value = 0.036). Age, BMI, gender, PFH signs and history, SSRI use, fibromyalgia history, % advancement of OA had no statistical association with post-procedure jaw pain. Conclusion Having a history of TMD symptoms prior to OAT is a risk factor for post-OAT jaw pain. A thorough oral and maxillofacial history in patients being considered for OAT is important to identify patients with TMD history, to establish a clear path to initiate OAT and to closely monitor, reduce or potentially eliminate the reported side effect. Support (if any)