Zimlichman, Eyal

AbstractLarge language models (LLMs) are transforming the field of natural language processing (NLP). These models offer opportunities for radiologists to make a meaningful impact in their field. NLP is a part of artificial intelligence (AI) that uses computer algorithms to study and understand text data. Recent advances in NLP include the Attention mechanism and the Transformer architecture. Transformer-based LLMs, such as GPT-4 and Gemini, are trained on massive amounts of data and generate human-like text. They are ideal for analysing large text data in academic research and clinical practice in radiology. Despite their promise, LLMs have limitations, including their dependency on the diversity and quality of their training data and the potential for false outputs. Albeit these limitations, the use of LLMs in radiology holds promise and is gaining momentum. By embracing the potential of LLMs, radiologists can gain valuable insights and improve the efficiency of their work. This can ultimately lead to improved patient care.

Abstract Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading health challenge worldwide. Exercise stress testing is a foundational non-invasive diagnostic tool. Nonetheless, its variable accuracy prompts the exploration of more reliable methods. Recent advancements in machine learning (ML), including deep learning and natural language processing, have shown potential in refining the interpretation of stress testing data. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we conducted a systematic review of ML applications in stress electrocardiogram (ECG) and stress echocardiography for CAD prognosis. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were used as databases. We analysed the ML models, outcomes, and performance metrics. Overall, seven relevant studies were identified. Machine-learning applications in stress ECGs resulted in sensitivity and specificity improvements. Some models achieved rates of above 96% in both metrics and reduced false positives by up to 21%. In stress echocardiography, ML models demonstrated an increase in diagnostic precision. Some models achieved specificity and sensitivity rates of up to 92.7 and 84.4%, respectively. Natural language processing applications enabled the categorization of stress echocardiography reports, with accuracy rates nearing 98%. Limitations include a small, retrospective study pool and the exclusion of nuclear stress testing, due to its well-documented status. This review indicates the potential of artificial intelligence applications in refining CAD stress testing assessment. Further development for real-world use is warranted.