Back to Authors

Qin, Shukui

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3414-2790

Mayo Clinic

General Hospital of Eastern Theater Command, Nanjing, China

Citations 2

Efficacy and safety of fruquintinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer according to prior treatment sequence in the refractory setting: Results from FRESCO and FRESCO-2.
Sobrero, Alberto , García‐Alfonso, Pilar , Höchster, Howard S. , Qin, Shukui , Schelman, William R., Fan, Songhua, Yu, Ziji, Chen, Lucy F., Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Dasari, Arvind , Eng, Cathy , Lonardi, Sara , Yoshino, Takayuki , Yao, James C. , Bianchi, Andrea Sartore , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Price, Timothy Jay , Tougeron, David , Li, Jin , Tabernero, Josep

Journal of Clinical Oncology | July 5, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: 3579-3579

10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.3579 Get It

3579 Background: Fruquintinib (F) is a highly selective, oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of all 3 VEGF receptors. Based on FRESCO (NCT02314819) and FRESCO-2 (NCT04322539) data, F was approved by the US FDA for previously treatedmetastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Efficacy and safety of F + best supportive care (BSC) vs placebo (P) + BSC were analyzed according to prior treatment (tx) sequence using FRESCO and FRESCO-2 data. Methods: In FRESCO and FRESCO-2, patients (pts) were randomized 2:1 to receive F 5 mg or matching P, PO daily x 21 days every 28 days. In FRESCO, eligible pts had received ≥2 prior chemotherapy regimens and were permitted to have received prior anti-VEGF and/or anti-EGFR therapies, whereas in FRESCO-2, in addition to standard chemotherapies, anti-VEGF, and anti-EGFR therapies if indicated, prior exposure to trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS) and/or regorafenib (rego) was required. FRESCO-2 pts must have also received a BRAF inhibitor and/or immunotherapy, if indicated and available in their country. Results: In FRESCO (F n=278 vs P n=138), no pts had received rego and 16/416 pts (4%) had received TAS. InFRESCO-2, prior therapies were balanced between F vs P arms; pts had received prior TAS or rego in these sequences: prior TAS only (n=240 vs n=121); prior rego only (n=40 vs n=18); prior rego then TAS (n=84 vs n=45); prior TAS then rego (n=95 vs n=44). Improvements in OS and PFS were seen with F vs P regardless of prior tx sequence (Table), with similar magnitudes of benefit for OS (HRs 0.53–0.77) and PFS (HRs 0.25–0.37). F safety profile was consistent regardless of prior tx sequence (Table). Conclusions: F is effective in mCRC with a manageable safety profile regardless of prior TAS or rego tx and sequence. Improvement with F was similar for OS and PFS despite the number and sequence of prior regimens. F provides a new tx option for pts with previously treated mCRC regardless of prior TAS or rego exposure. Clinical trial information: NCT04322539 . [Table: see text]
CLO24-088: Efficacy of Fruquintinib in Less Heavily Pretreated Patients (Pts) With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (mCRC): Profile-Matched Data From FRESCO and FRESCO-2
Jones, Jeremy , Shen, Lin , Bai, Yuxian , Deng, Yanhong , Yang, Zhao, Schelman, William R., Qin, Shukui , Jones, Jeremy C , Dasari, Arvind , Eng, Cathy , Lonardi, Sara , García‐Carbonero, Rocio , Masuishi, Toshiki , Cremolini, Chiara , Ghiringhelli, François , Hubbard, Joleen M. , Bekaii‐Saab, Tanios , Xu, Rui‐Hua , Xu, Jianming , Yuan, Ying , Wei, Wei , Lin, Jianchang , Chen, Lucy L , Li, Jin

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 5, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 2.5 | Pages: No page available

10.6004/jnccn.2023.7171 Get It