Back to Authors

Narang, Amol

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0876-4967

Mayo Clinic

Johns Hopkins University

Citations 5

Ampullary Adenocarcinoma, Version 1.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Chiorean, E. Gabriela , Chiaro, Marco Del , Tempero, Margaret A. , Malafa, Mokenge P. , Benson, Al B. , Cardin, Dana B. , Christensen, Jared A. , Czito, Brian G. , Dillhoff, Mary , Donahue, Timothy R. , Hardacre, Jeffrey M., Klute, Kelsey , Ko, Andrew H. , LoConte, Noelle K. , Lowy, Andrew M. , Masood, Ashiq , Moravek, Cassadie, Nakakura, Eric K. , Narang, Amol , Nardo, Lorenzo , Obando, Jorge, Reddy, Sushanth , Reyngold, Marsha , Scaife, Courtney L. , Shen, Jeanne , Truty, Mark J. , Vollmer, Charles M., Wolff, Robert A. , Wolpin, Brian M. , McCullough, Beth, Lubin, Senem, Darlow, Susan, Cardin, Dana B , LoConte, Noelle , Chung, Vincent , Dotan, Efrat , Fountzilas, Christos , Glazer, Evan S. , Hawkins, William G , Kunstman, John W. , Polanco, Patricio Marcelo

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | July 11, 2023 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 753-782

10.6004/jnccn.2023.0034 Get It

Ampullary cancers refer to tumors originating from the ampulla of Vater (the ampulla, the intraduodenal portion of the bile duct, and the intraduodenal portion of the pancreatic duct), while periampullary cancers may arise from locations encompassing the head of the pancreas, distal bile duct, duodenum, or ampulla of Vater. Ampullary cancers are rare gastrointestinal malignancies, and prognosis varies greatly based on factors such as patient age, TNM classification, differentiation grade, and treatment modality received. Systemic therapy is used in all stages of ampullary cancer, including neoadjuvant therapy, adjuvant therapy, and first-line or subsequent-line therapy for locally advanced, metastatic, and recurrent disease. Radiation therapy may be used in localized ampullary cancer, sometimes in combination with chemotherapy, but there is no high-level evidence to support its utility. Select tumors may be treated surgically. This article describes NCCN recommendations regarding management of ampullary adenocarcinoma.
Multiagent Chemotherapy Followed by Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Radiotherapy for Resected Pancreas Cancer
Mokhtech, Meriem , Miccio, Joseph A., Johung, Kimberly L. , Stein, Stacey , Narang, Amol , Herman, Joseph M. , Haddock, Michael G. , Anker, Christopher J. , Hallemeier, Christopher L. , Cecchini, Michael , Kunstman, John W. , Jabbour, Salma K , Hallemeier, Christopher Leigh , Jethwa, Krishan R.

American Journal of Clinical Oncology | November 1, 2022 | Volume: 45 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 450-457

10.1097/coc.0000000000000947 Get It

Background and Purpose: Chemotherapy followed by margin-negative resection (R0) is the treatment of choice for patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Neoadjuvant multiagent chemotherapy (MAC) or MAC then radiotherapy (RT) may optimize surgical candidacy. The purpose of this study was to compare pathologic outcomes of MAC followed by conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (CRT) versus stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for patients with resected PDAC. Methods: Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic PDAC between 2012 and 2017 and who received preoperative MAC or MAC+RT were identified in the National Cancer Database. Variables associated with R0 and overall survival were identified with logistic regression and Cox analysis (P<0.05). Results: A total of 5273 patients were identified (MAC: 3900, MAC+CRT: 955, MAC+SBRT: 418). The median RT dose/fraction (fx) in the MAC+CRT and MAC+SBRT cohorts was 50.4 Gy/28 fx and 33 Gy/5 fx. Patients receiving MAC+CRT versus MAC+SBRT had similar rates of ypT3-T4 disease (54% vs. 58%, P=0.187), R0 (87% vs. 84%, P=0.168), and pathologic complete response (pathologic complete response; 6% vs. 4%, P=0.052), however, MAC+CRT was associated with less regional lymphatic disease (ypN+: 28% vs. 41%, P<0.001). The median overall survival of patients receiving MAC+CRT versus MAC+SBRT was 24.6 versus 29.5 months (P=0.045). Conclusions: For patients with resected PDAC, MAC+CRT, and MAC+SBRT had similar rates of R0 and pathologic complete response, although MAC+CRT was associated with lower ypN+. Prospective evaluation of neoadjuvant RT regimens with attention to radiation therapy design is warranted.
Physician Practice Variability in the Use of Extended-Fraction Radiation Therapy for Bone Metastases: Are We Choosing Wisely?
Wang, Peiqi , Sedhom, Ramy , Chino, Fumiko , Waddle, Mark R. , Johnson, David H. , Sanford, Nina N. , Narang, Amol , Alcorn, Sara R. , Makary, Martin A. , Gupta, Arjun , Miller, Robert C.

JCO Oncology Practice | April 13, 2020 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 8 | Pages: e758-e769

10.1200/jop.19.00633 Get It

PURPOSE: Routine use of extended-fraction (> 10 fractions) radiation therapy (RT) for palliation of bone metastases is recognized as a low-value intervention by the American Society for Radiation Oncology. We examined contemporary practice patterns of, and physician characteristics associated with extended-fraction RT use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Medicare fee-for-service data. We included patients who underwent 2- or 3-dimensional external-beam RT for bone metastases between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. Physicians treating > 10 patients over the study period were analyzed for their individual practice. Hierarchic logistic regression modeling was used to identify patient- and physician-level factors associated with extended-fraction RT use. RESULTS: A total of 12,221 patients (median age, 75.6 years; 40.9% women, 87.6% white) were included. The rate of extended-fraction RT was 23.4%. A total of 1,432 physicians treated any patient. Among the 382 physicians treating > 10 patients, 127 (33.2%) used extended-fraction RT > 30% (consensus threshold). Physician factors associated with decreased odds of extended-fraction RT were years since medical school graduation (≤ 10 years and 11-20 years v ≥ 31 years: adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.32 [95% CI, 0.20 to 0.51] and 0.64 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.93]) and practicing in the Northeast or Midwest versus the South (aOR, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.58] and 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.74]). Physicians treating > 20 patients ( v 11-14 patients) over the study period had increased odds of delivering extended-fraction RT (aOR, 1.53 [95% CI, 1.10 to 2.12]). CONCLUSION: In this study, almost one fourth of patients received extended-fraction RT, and one third of physicians had an extended-fraction RT use rate of > 30%. Personalized feedback of performance data, clinical pathways and peer review, and updated reimbursement models are potential mechanisms to address this low-value care.
Resectable pancreatic small cell carcinoma: The experience of two institutions and review of the literature.
Narang, Amol , Laheru, Daniel A. , Eckhauser, F. E., Olson, Maria , Miller, Robin, Andersen, Dana K. , Winter, John M. , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Herman, Joseph M. , Cameron, Judy L.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 23, 2017 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 4_suppl | Pages: 333-333

10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.333 Get It

333 Background: Primary pancreatic small cell carcinoma (SCC) is rare, with just over 30 cases reported in the literature. Only 7 of these patients underwent surgical resection with a median survival of 6 months. Prognosis of SCC is therefore considered to be poor, and the role of adjuvant therapy is uncertain. Here we report two institutions' experience with resectable pancreatic SCC. Methods: Six patients with pancreatic SCC at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (4 patients) and the Mayo Clinic (2 patients) were identified from prospectively collected pancreatic cancer databases and re-reviewed by pathology. All six patients underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Clinicopathologic data was analyzed, and the literature on pancreatic SCC was reviewed. Results: Median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range 27-60). Half of the patients were male, and half were known smokers. All six masses were limited to the pancreatic head. Median tumor size was 3 cm, and all cases had positive lymph nodes except for one patient who only had five nodes sampled. There was no perioperative mortality, although three patients had postoperative complications. All six patients received adjuvant chemotherapy therapy, five of whom were given cisplatin and etoposide. Of these five patients, three were known to have received radiation, while the remaining two had a plan for radiation at an outside facility. Median survival was 20 months with a range of 9-173 months. The patient who lived for 9 months received chemotherapy only, while the patient who lived for 173 months was given chemoradiation with cisplatin and etoposide and represents the longest reported survival time from pancreatic SCC to date. Conclusions: Pancreatic SCC is an extremely rare form of cancer with a poor prognosis. Patients in this surgical series showed improved survival rates when compared to prior experiences with both resected and unresectable cases. Cisplatin and etoposide appears to be the preferred chemotherapy regimen, although its efficacy remains uncertain, as does the role of combined modality treatment with radiation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.
Resectable pancreatic small cell carcinoma
Narang, Amol , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Herman, Joseph M. , Cameron, John L., Laheru, Dan, Eckhauser, Fred E., Olson, Mathew T., Hruban, Ralph H. , Miller, Robert C. , Andersen, Dana K. , Winter, Jordan Michael , Mansfield, Aaron S

Rare Tumors | January 28, 2011 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 13-17

10.4081/rt.2011.e5 Get It

Primary pancreatic small cell carcinoma (SCC) is rare, with just over 30 cases reported in the literature. Only 7 of these patients underwent surgical resection with a median survival of 6 months. Prognosis of SCC is therefore considered to be poor, and the role of adjuvant therapy is uncertain. Here we report two institutions’ experience with resectable pancreatic SCC. Six patients with pancreatic SCC treated at the Johns Hopkins Hospital (4 patients) and the Mayo Clinic (2 patients) were identified from prospectively collected pancreatic cancer databases and re-reviewed by pathology. All six patients underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy. Clinicopathologic data were analyzed, and the literature on pancreatic SCC was reviewed. Median age at diagnosis was 50 years (range 27–60). All six tumors arose in the head of the pancreas. Median tumor size was 3 cm, and all cases had positive lymph nodes except for one patient who only had five nodes sampled. There were no perioperative deaths and three patients had at least one postoperative complication. All six patients received adjuvant therapy, five of whom were given combined modality treatment with radiation, cisplatin, and etoposide. Median survival was 20 months with a range of 9–173 months. The patient who lived for 9 months received chemotherapy only, while the patient who lived for 173 months was given chemoradiation with cisplatin and etoposide and represents the longest reported survival time from pancreatic SCC to date. Pancreatic SCC is an extremely rare form of cancer with a poor prognosis. Patients in this surgical series showed favorable survival rates when compared to prior reports of both resected and unresectable SCC. Cisplatin and etoposide appears to be the preferred chemotherapy regimen, although its efficacy remains uncertain, as does the role of combined modality treatment with radiation.