Nikolajevic, Nikola

Fungal pericarditis is a rare disease but its incidence has risen in parallel with the global increase in invasive fungal infections. This systematic review analyzes data from previously reported cases of fungal pericarditis to provide an improved understanding of the etiology, clinical presentation, management, and outcomes of this rare disease. We reviewed Medline and Scopus databases from 1 January 1990 to 29 January 2024 for case reports that documented the isolation of a fungal pathogen from pericardial fluid or tissue. Of the 2330 articles screened, 101 cases met the inclusion criteria. Patients with fungal pericarditis and the involvement of at least one other organ—usually the lungs, brain, or kidney—had worse outcomes than patients with isolated pericardial disease. Immunosuppression was reported in 50% of cases and was associated with worse outcomes in adults. Patients who presented with chest pain, received adequate empiric antifungal therapy, and underwent pericardiocentesis and pericardiectomy had improved survival. The most common isolated pathogens were Candida spp., followed by Aspergillus spp. and Mucor spp., with the latter two linked to worse outcomes. Only 35% of patients received empiric antifungal medications before the causative pathogen was identified, and mortality was associated with a delay in appropriate therapy. Immunosuppression, disseminated disease, and presence of shock/multiorgan failure were additional risk factors associated with death. Fungal pericarditis carries a mortality rate of up to 50%, with nearly half of patients being immunocompromised. Clinicians frequently do not consider fungal pericarditis in the differential diagnoses, which leads to delays in treatment and poorer outcomes. Further prospective multicenter studies are urgently needed to better understand the epidemiology, improve diagnostic testing and management, and decrease unacceptably high mortality in patients with fungal pericarditis.

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) secondary to tick-borne infections is a rare but potentially life-threatening syndrome. We performed a scoping review according to PRISMA guidelines to systematically analyze the existing literature on the topic. A total of 98 patients were included, with a mean age of 43.7 years, of which 64% were men. Most cases, 31%, were reported from the USA. Immunosuppression was present in 21.4%, with the most common cause being previous solid organ transplantation. Constitutional symptoms were the most common, observed in 83.7% of the patients, while fever was reported in 70.4% of cases. Sepsis was present in 27.6%. The most common laboratory abnormalities in this cohort were thrombocytopenia in 81.6% of patients, while anemia, leukopenia, and leukocytosis were observed in 75.5%, 55.1%, and 10.2%, respectively. Liver enzyme elevation was noted in 63.3% of cases. The H-score was analyzed in 64 patients, with the mean value being 209, and bone marrow analysis was performed in 61.2% of patients. Ehrlichia spp. was the main isolated agent associated with HLH in 45.9%, followed by Rickettsia spp. in 14.3% and Anaplasma phagocytophilum in 12.2%. Notably, no patient with Powassan virus infection or Lyme borreliosis developed HLH. The most common complications were acute kidney injury (AKI) in 35.7% of patients, shock with multiple organ dysfunction in 22.5%, encephalopathy/seizure in 20.4%, respiratory failure in 16.3%, and cardiac complications in 7.1% of patients. Treatment included antibiotic therapy alone in 43.9%, while 5.1% of patients were treated with immunosuppressants alone. Treatment with both antibiotics and immunosuppressants was used in 51% of patients. Appropriate empiric antibiotics were used in 62.2%. In 43.9% of cases of HLH due to tick-borne disease, patients received only antimicrobial therapy, and 88.4% of those recovered completely without the need for immunosuppressive therapy. The mortality rate in our review was 16.3%, and patients who received inappropriate or delayed empiric therapy had a worse outcome. Hence, we suggest empiric antibiotic treatment in patients who are suspected of having HLH due to tick-borne disease or in whom diagnostic uncertainty persists due to diagnostic delay in order to minimize mortality.