Hryniewicz, Katarzyna

Left ventricular recovery (LV) in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) supported by a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is uncommon but clinically significant. There is limited understanding on the timing of LV recovery in relation to LVAD implantation. A total of 383 HF patients who underwent LVAD implantation were evaluated for LV functional improvement defined as an absolute increase in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of greater than or equal to 20% post-LVAD placement. Out of 383 LVAD patients, 39 (10.1%) demonstrated significant LV improvement. Among these, 25 (64%) patients had received LVAD less than or equal to 1 year of HF diagnosis, whereas 14 (36%) patients were implanted greater than 1 year from HF diagnosis. No significant differences in baseline imaging or hemodynamics were found between these two groups. The timing of LVAD implantation and time from LVAD to LVEF improvement was not associated with 5 year outcomes. Survival, free from HF relapse or transplant was 59% in the less than or equal to 1 year and 46% in greater than 1 year HF duration groups ( p = 0.83). Thus, LV functional improvement can occur across a broad spectrum of HF duration, suggesting that the potential for recovery is not limited to those with newly diagnosed disease.

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a significant cause of mortality in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Although right ventricular assist devices (RVADs) can treat RVF in the perioperative LVAD period, liberal employment before RVF is not well established. We therefore compared the survival outcomes between proactive RVAD placement at the time of LVAD implantation with a bailout strategy in patients with RVF. Retrospectively, 75 adult patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation at our institution and had an RVAD placed proactively before LVAD implantation or as a bailout strategy postoperatively due to hemodynamically unstable RVF were evaluated. Patients treated with a proactive RVAD strategy had lower Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) and a higher proportion of these required temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) preoperatively. Preoperative hemodynamic profiling showed a low pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) score of 1.8 ± 1.4 and 1.6 ± 0.94 (p = 0.42) in the bailout RVAD and proactive RVAD groups, respectively. Survival at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LVAD implantation was statistically significantly higher in patients who received a proactive RVAD. Thus, proactive RVAD implantation is associated with short- and medium-term survival benefits compared to a bailout strategy in RVF patients undergoing LVAD placement.